It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Agit8dChop
originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: Xcathdra
Those Soros' backed protestors surely flipped FLAKE in an elevator...
yep.. that did it.
As soon as I saw that, i knew it was a problem.
The girls in the lift looked scared
Flake was looking around for security
He couldn't leave
He was being filmed
the Girls were asking legitimate questions about sexual assault and rape - but framing it very dishonestly.
Soros, Clinton, Kamel, Comey, Mccabe, Strzok... they all watched that little piece of footage and laughed!
originally posted by: SPNoble
Awesome news but I'm not gonna celebrate till he's officially sworn in, the Democrats have another 5 days or so to pull some BS
Ford's Senate testimony: 'I will never forget' the details of night of alleged assault
originally posted by: carewemust
The PUSH BACK to Mitchell's report/findings is starting already. Pushing the "trauma erases memory" angle, without mentioning Christine Ford by name.
www.ajc.com...
During a part of the question Mitchell asked Ford about her letter to Feinstein. In her response Ford stated Feinstein told her she would release the letter just prior to the vote occurring.
MITCHELL: Thank you, counsel. I want to make sure I understood what you said. Was it your understanding, it was going to be kept confidential up until right before the hearing?
FORD: It was my understanding that it was going to be kept confidential period.
(UNKNOWN): Excuse me. You’ve all asked her not to guess, and now you’re asking her what’s possible. So I think if you want to ask her what she knows, you should ask her what she knows.
MITCHELL: Is that an objection (ph), counsel?
(UNKNOWN): It is an objection (ph)…
MITCHELL: I’ll have the chair rule on that.
FORD: I don’t know what the — I don’t understand.
FORD: So I don’t totally understand the question, but I didn’t speak with anyone during that timeframe other than my counsel.
MITCHELL: OK. You’ve said repeatedly that you did not think that that letter that you wrote on July 30th was going to be released to the public, is that correct?
FORD: Correct.
MITCHELL: OK. And is it true that you did not authorize it to be released at any time?
FORD: Correct.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: TinySickTears
No, that is the polygraph statement.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ketsuko
It would be an all time epic backfire if the dems holding this info and using it to ambush kavanaugh caused them to not take the house or senate.
Do they not understand how many regular people are angry about this?
A "he said, she said" case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.
- Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of when the alleged assault happened.
- Dr. Ford has struggled to identify Judge Kavanaugh as the assailant by name.
- When speaking with her husband, Dr. Ford changed her description of the incident to become less specific.
- Dr. Ford has no memory of key details of the night in question--details that could help corroborate her account.
- Dr. Ford's account of the alleged assault has not been corroborated by anyone she identified as having attended--even her lifelong friend.
- Dr. Ford has not offered a consistent account of the alleged assault.
- Dr. Ford has struggled to recall important recent events relating to her allegations, and her testimony regarding recent events raises further questions about her memory.
- Dr. Ford's description of the psychological impact of the event raises questions.
- The activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford's attorneys likely affected Dr. Ford's account.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Cornczech
She says she was terrified of boys for years. Yet people from her college days have said she hooked up with guys a lot.
originally posted by: Cornczech
Flake is a TOTAL wimp...would YOU vote for a "man" who allowed someone to yell at them: "LOOKK AT ME WHEN I AM TALKING TO YOU!!!!" My MOTHER used to say that to me when I was 5 years old!!!
a reply to: LSU2018
originally posted by: Cornczech
well, she said she was afraid of flying, yet flew for "pleasure".....I guess she's afraid of "boys" except for her pleasure......a reply to: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: Grambler
Excellent summary by Mitchell
Many of us participating on the live thread picked a lot of this up
However, it won’t matter to the Dems or the media
They know Kavanaugh is guilty and we are monsters for even reading Mitchell’s report here
originally posted by: SPNoble
Awesome news but I'm not gonna celebrate till he's officially sworn in, the Democrats have another 5 days or so to pull some BS