It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tempter
After the Kavanaugh / Blasey-Ford hearings Jeff Flake was confronted by several women and seemingly caved to their demands to vote Yes on Kavanaugh only after an FBI investigation is completed towards Ford's claims.
Trump was accused then of not supporting the FBI investigation, but then quickly voiced his support for it, confusing some.
NBC then ran a story stating that Trump was limiting the investigations to a select group of Kavanaugh's accusers.
From the NBC story:
While the FBI will examine the allegations of Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez, the bureau had not been permitted to investigate the claims of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Kavanaugh of engaging in sexual misconduct at parties while he was a student at Georgetown Preparatory School in the 1980s, those people familiar with the investigation told NBC News.
The NY Times also ran a similar story backing up NBC's claims.
From the NY Times story:
r. Trump, who had hoped Judge Kavanaugh would be sworn in by the time the Supreme Court opens its next term on Monday, said he was ordering the F.B.I. to conduct what he called a “supplemental” investigation that he said “must be limited in scope and completed in less than a week,” as the Republican Senate leadership had asked for.
Trump then releases this tweet.
NBC News incorrectly reported (as usual) that I was limiting the FBI investigation of Judge Kavanaugh, and witnesses, only to certain people. Actually, I want them to interview whoever they deem appropriate, at their discretion. Please correct your reporting! - @realdonaldtrump
*emphasis is mine
Could Trump be actually expanding this Kavanaugh investigation beyond just Kavanaugh and the accusers?
Bill Mitchell weighs in:
tweet
Trump knew this FBI Investigation was coming. He pulled the trigger immediately with zero handwringing and assets were in place immediately. Something BIG is going down. The Dems have been set up.
and then Bill tweets this:
tweet
We know that Flake spoke to Rosenstein before he called for the investigation. What if Rosenstein really is a white hat in #SlowWalker and was tasked with flipping Flake to get the FBI involved? What if the Rosenstein coup thing is a feint to get Dems to drop their guard?
What could Bill Mitchell be talking about, ATS?
PLEASE WEIGH IN!
The FBI will do a supplemental background investigation, then I'm going to call for an investigation of what happened in this committee. Who betrayed Dr. Ford's trust? Who in Feinstein's office recommended Katz as a lawyer? Why did Ms. Ford not know that the committee was willing to go to California?"
The Utah senator said one “key reason” that has caused him concern over potential delays was learning during last Thursday’s committee hearing that Ford would have preferred to have been interviewed privately in California, rather than at a televised committee hearing. He wrote that Ford’s attorneys did not inform her of numerous offers by the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman to conduct a public or private interview wherever she preferred.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: loam
Dunno I've avoided the Q threads, anonymous information bothers me even if its confirmation bias material.
As for your third option, that is a possibility but at the same time I am not sure if his ego could stand admitting being hands on could hurt the situation.
originally posted by: Chance321
a reply to: Boadicea
If we're lucky this'll blow up right in the democrats face. They were the ones beating the drum loudest for an FBI investigation. Well, careful what you wish for.
tweet
@realdonaldtrump
Wow! Just starting to hear the Democrats, who are only thinking Obstruct and Delay, are starting to put out the word that the “time” and “scope” of FBI looking into Judge Kavanaugh and witnesses is not enough. Hello! For them, it will never be enough - stay tuned and watch!
originally posted by: carewemust
DIANE FEINSTEIN IS TOAST!
Check out her letter. This is how GUILTY people act.
See her 9/30/2018 letter here: theconservativetreehouse.com...-154739
originally posted by: carewemust
DIANE FEINSTEIN IS TOAST!
Check out her letter. This is how GUILTY people act....
Given the seriousness of the allegations before the Senate, I am writing to request that you provide the Senate Judiciary Committee with a copy of the written directive sent by the White House to the FBI.
In addition, if the FBI requests any expansion beyond the initial directive, please provide the names of any additional witnesses or evidence.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Boadicea
It seems more like she wants to know if she or anyone else involved in her plot...
What else is any of Feinstein's business?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Boadicea
Feinstein's letter sounds like (she thinks) she's in charge of the Senate Judiciary Committee. She is not. Grassley is.