It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Senator Grassley Sends Criminal Referral to FBI - Investigate This Brett Kavanaugh Accuser.

page: 9
67
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 04:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

This contains information about the polygraph:
Ford Polygraph Test




posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Even worse, the questions asked pertained only to a pre-written response. Lol.

Mg



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Sookiechacha

They never asked her those kind of questions in the polygraph.
They asked her TWO questions.


There was a complaint that the polygrapher only asked 2 "relevant" questions. 1) if her statements were true and 2) if anything in her statement was false. We don't know what else the polygrapher asked her. The Dems wanted to allow the polygrapher to testify, but Grassley wouldn't have it. Perhaps, if they had, their complaints would be valid. But right now, they're not.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 04:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

See my link above.
This was supplied by Ford's attorney, and shows what the polygraph examiner asked her.

Grassley asked for all audio, video and charts from the polygraph. That link shows what he received.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 04:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I think you are assuming quite a lot in what Ford wanted and why.

They did mention the other two and the timeline of interviews was entered into record.
We don't know when the Dems knew of them but it was on the Committee records.

The actual transcript of none of the interviews are public right now so I wouldn't expect two men's interviews to be. We don't know if they made an official statement either.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 05:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Sookiechacha

This contains information about the polygraph:
Ford Polygraph Test


Thanks


Blasey was then interviewed in an effort to formulate the relevant questions. During this interview, Blasey described the events that occurred on the night of the assault.



So, during her time in that hotel, she recounted the event to the polygrapher, after she went over it with her lawyers and after she wrote it down for the polygrapher in advance.


Like I said, for me, the more I recount old event in my past, the clearer my memory becomes.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 05:04 PM
link   
Video: Interview with Ford's Polygrapher
edit on 30-9-2018 by Identified because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Identified




I think you are assuming quite a lot in what Ford wanted and why.



Yep. I can only speculate on why Ford and her attorney's ignored Grassley's offer to send a staffer to California and take her statement.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Actually.....The more you recount events the more the memories are distorted.

Your Memory is like the Telephone Game


edit on 30-9-2018 by Identified because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 05:29 PM
link   
Triple post
edit on 30-9-2018 by Identified because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 05:29 PM
link   
Triple post!
edit on 30-9-2018 by Identified because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 05:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

The polygraph exam was started AFTER that interview.
It is on the report.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 05:35 PM
link   
Was Ford even invited to the party? How rude showing up to guzzle their beer.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 05:36 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

The interview I posted also lays out the events and explains why it was only two questions.
He tells you more about what she had said from his own notes of questions to her.
He also makes it clear he isn't there to determine the veracity of their claim.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Identified

What she said while not hooked up?



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 06:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

It's very possible Ford had nothing to do with that. Someone did, we need to know who and why.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 06:41 PM
link   
WOW..Check this out!

Diane Feinstein is suddenly afraid of being investigated.

Read the letter she sent to the White House and FBI today.

In this article: theconservativetreehouse.com...-154739



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 06:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen


Don't take my word. Look at what the "professionals" think.


Five Times Brett Kavanaugh Appears to Have Lied to Congress While Under Oath www.motherjones.com...

Kavanaugh Lied to the Judiciary Committee—Repeatedly slate.com...

Brett Kavanaugh’s Perjury Avalanche — 50 Years in the Making www.alternet.org...

Kavanaugh’s Yale Classmate Says He Lied About His Drinking crooksandliars.com...





Those are all impartial sources with no dog in the fight.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 06:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Yes, the clearer they become. Want to know why? It's because your mind is creating details. The memory is clearer, but less accurate.

Every time you access a memory you run the risk of creating false details.



posted on Sep, 30 2018 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Who is that guy always with DF? Sat behind her during the hearings.







 
67
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join