Ford - Kavanaugh Hearings 9-27-18

Democrats aren't even asking questions now, they're just talking to her. Let's see if they treat Kavanaugh the same way.

originally posted by: neo96
A professor doesn't KNOW what exculpatory means?

LOL.

I didn't know what it means, but given the context it was obvious.

You going to laugh at me too, tough guy?????

originally posted by: CADpro
a reply to: TinySickTears

You should get that prostate checked if you pee'd that many times. Can't claim it as sexual assault by your doc. lol?

I have chronic prostate problems

Wait a minute...

She "escapes" the house of horrors...and someone is magically outside waiting to take her home?

She says nothing about calling from the house to get a ride home.

Did she have a cell phone in 1982?

a reply to: Deetermined

They know if the FBI gets involved the nomination will have to be delayed.

That was their tactic all along, they never meant to incriminate him, since they're false accusations that can't be corroborated by anyone or anything.

They'll just stock pile false accusations after this hearing until either he's confirmed or the FBI announce an investigation.

a reply to: CynConcepts

She does not say that she unlocked the door

If she left them room she would have had to unlock the door.

Not sure why you don't realize this?

a reply to: MisterSpock

She seems very obliging and credible to me. I think the GOP is going to regret this.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: StoutBroux

she said that Judge and Kavanaugh were drunk. No one else. So no she didn't go to a party where alcohol was being served and in fact she stated it was not a party but a pre party gathering of folks who were going to a party later in the evening.

So...where did she get the one beer she claims to have had?

a reply to: LSU2018

Any bets on whether they ask him when he lost his virginity and to whom?

a reply to: LSU2018

I'm looking forward to see the questions they're gonna ask him.

It's embarrassing for them.

a reply to: MisterSpock

I'm not a phd and knew.

So hahahaa.

a reply to: loam

Breathe loam, breathe. Nothing has been lost for Kavanaugh. The onus of proof was on Ford, she's failed. The two men who testified yesterday that they were the two who assaulted her... her best friend being unable to cooroborate any of her stories... the changing narratives... she lost before she ever stepped foot in front of the committee, this day has been purely for show. Kavanaugh will be confirmed via a 50-50 split vote with Mike Pence breaking the tie middle of next week. Breathe, my friend, all is still well here.

Again doesnt rememebr showing them note. This sounds ridiculous

a reply to: Sillyolme

Hitler would seem like a very genuine and kind person to you if he talked ill of Trump.

a reply to: neo96

It seems to be in response to who is talking, too... every time a Republican speaks, she gets nervous, but when the prosecutor or a Democrat speaks, she seems fine. I smell a political bent.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: MisterSpock

She seems very obliging and credible to me. I think the GOP is going to regret this.

Based on what I've read from you in the past, you have ZERO ability to judge character when it comes to politics.

But thanks for letting me know either way.

a reply to: neo96

She said she doesn't know what exculpatory evidence meant. wow she's not pretentious. Thats gotta count against her.
Geez.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
she smiles and laughs and bounces around a lot for someone terrified

No kidding.

Turns it on and off like a switch.

Maybe that is not what she is trying to "turn on"
Maybe looking to bag her a Congressperson in the process...?
With the smiles and laughs and bouncing around...

Sorry , I could not help myself.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Did she have a cell phone in 1982?

Only one percenters could afford them.


www.pcworld.com...

But they were big and bulky.

originally posted by: SonOfThor
a reply to: UKTruth

Whitehouse is flat out lying. He said she made consistent claims, as well as statements that were consistent with facts...

We have heard, in this hearing alone (not to mention previous documents in evidence) that her claims have had inconsistencies...

Their speeches were written prior to this hearing. They're definitely not based on the hearing today.