Ford - Kavanaugh Hearings 9-27-18

So they want to put Kavanaugh and his family through yet ANOTHER week of hell?

How is that right?

a reply to: Sillyolme

Could be he is, but I'd bet the optics are the reason...not beating up/bullying/whateva on Ford when his side got a win (basically).

a reply to: IAMTAT

It's all about the delay...not the FBI.
More accusations will be gathered during that time...JUST LIKE the last week gave time to Creepy Porn Lawyer to come up with Gang Rape girl.

I say let the Democrats try it and screw themselves for good. At least the Republicans will say they tried to give them a fair shake while the Democrats continue to shoot themselves in the foot and lose more votes.

a reply to: texasgirl

We? You have a say in this?

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's all about the delay...not the FBI.
More accusations will be gathered during that time...JUST LIKE the last week gave time to Creepy Porn Lawyer to come up with Gang Rape girl.

I say let the Democrats try it and screw themselves for good. At least the Republicans will say they tried to give them a fair shake while the Democrats continue to shoot themselves in the foot and lose more votes.

Except that the Democrats already just got done screwing themselves for good.

a reply to: DanDanDat

hee hee yeah sure

originally posted by: Sillyolme
I just saw that trump thinks Dr Ford was a credible witness. Did I get that right? Did you guys see that?
Sounds like hes putting distance between him and Kavanaugh now.

Trump's just trying to be respectful of Ford, but he still has confirmed his support for Kavanaugh.

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's all about the delay...not the FBI.
More accusations will be gathered during that time...JUST LIKE the last week gave time to Creepy Porn Lawyer to come up with Gang Rape girl.

I say let the Democrats try it and screw themselves for good. At least the Republicans will say they tried to give them a fair shake while the Democrats continue to shoot themselves in the foot and lose more votes.

The Republicans so far seem like they're trying to be fair to all concerned. The Democrats are acting like a bunch of jackboot thugs out to destroy anyone they don't like. I say let them try, because it's never been more obvious how completely disgusting these "human beings" are.

Notice how few people on this board have been willing to defend the Dems over these last few days?

a reply to: IAMTAT

boo hoo if hes so innocent his family should have no problem standing by him. Whats the trouble with him and his family?
Is his wife leaving him?

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

How does it go to the character of the man, if the accusations are, and likely will remain, unproven?

In an investigative stage, unproven is not the same as innocent, right? Direct question for you...is it better for America to get a conservative judge on the SC ahead of the election, even though his ethics are being challenged, or is it more important to put the right guy on the bench?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Except that the Democrats already just got done screwing themselves for good.

I'm sure they've managed to convince some of their constituents that the Republicans haven't been fair. I dare them to say it again after we've cut them a break. They pull another stunt after giving them a little more rope and more people are going to see right through them.

a reply to: Gazrok

Seven republican senators are 80+ years old. Two dems are 80+ ... for what its worth

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Wayfarer

No prosecutor would bring this case.
There is no evidence.
With that in mind, one would have to be crazy to punish the accused.

This is not a trial, it is a job interview...

Did you ever have a job interview where your potential employer labeled you a 'Serial Gang Rapist'?

I have never hired an employee that was accused of being a serial gang rapist.
But if they were, I am sure as hell going to ask about it and investigate before offering anyone a position.

Not what I asked you.

Well, the truth is I have never had to interview for a job. I started my own company out of college a couple decades back, started two more after that. I do interview a lot of people for positions, but never had to be interviewed, unless working on a farm in HS and college summers counts, but they really don't do background checks.

Someone I want to hire is accused credibly of sexual assault, I am going to want to have someone investigate.

Murkowski just announced she is joining Flake.

a reply to: RedParrotHead

Im just pointing that out because when I said it yesterday that a lot of people thought she was a credible witness I got a bunch of crap.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: texasgirl

We? You have a say in this?

With my vote in November, yes.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

boo hoo if hes so innocent his family should have no problem standing by him. Whats the trouble with him and his family?
Is his wife leaving him?

No problem there. However, I have to wonder why recent documents (like the polygraph report) only show Christine Blasey Ford's name as Christine Blasey. I'm wondering if her husband hasn't already dumped her in this process.

So can I get $500k in a gofundme if I say Feinstein touched my 1 year old peepee in 1981? I mean I cant remember any details at all because I was 1, but I am sure it happened. Anyone who doesn't believe me obviously hates babies.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's all about the delay...not the FBI.
More accusations will be gathered during that time...JUST LIKE the last week gave time to Creepy Porn Lawyer to come up with Gang Rape girl.

I say let the Democrats try it and screw themselves for good. At least the Republicans will say they tried to give them a fair shake while the Democrats continue to shoot themselves in the foot and lose more votes.

The Republicans so far seem like they're trying to be fair to all concerned.

Then why are they trying to ram through a flawed candidate in the fear that they will lose the Senate majority? If they lose that, then they lose the public mandate to advance their candidate for nomination. And that is fair how?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

boo hoo if hes so innocent his family should have no problem standing by him. Whats the trouble with him and his family?
Is his wife leaving him?

Wow...Did you really just say that?