It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Ha...11 yes 8 no...booker and Harris refused to vote.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Grambler
Spartacus wont say yes or no!
That guy is such a tool.
Only slightly less so that Farticus Whitehouse.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Grambler
Spartacus wont say yes or no!
That guy is such a tool.
Only slightly less so that Farticus Whitehouse.
He knows how serious assault against women are, because he has sexually assaulted a woman.
Why wont all of the dems call for an fbi investigation into booker?
originally posted by: IAMTAT
OMG. Hirono and others just walked out in protest.
Fresh diapers and formula will be served outside the hearing room.
originally posted by: Deetermined
Feinstein is lying again stating that Republicans refuse to talk to Ramirez and Swetnick, when in reality, the two women have refused to speak to the Judiciary Committee altogether.
Committee staff receives statement from Julie Swetnick, represented by Mr. Avenatti.
· Committee staff responds asking that Ms. Swetnick be made available for an interview with committee staff. Mr. Avenatti returns an email, but does not respond to this request.
· Committee staff follows up with Mr. Avenatti twice more asking that Ms. Swetnick be made available for an interview.
· Committee investigative staff questions Judge Kavanaugh a third time this week on the allegations contained in the statement provided by Mr. Avenatti, along with any anonymous allegations made by a purported resident of San Diego.
· Committee investigative staff spoke with a friend of Ms. Swetnick about her allegations and any related information. The friend indicated that Ms. Swetnick had never previously mentioned either Judge Kavanaugh or this alleged incident.