It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The only official USAF statements relate to Night One, not released until 1999.
On Night Three, Colonel Halt stated he saw 20-30 personnel milling about in the forest before he began his investigation
Are you thinking of jumping into this rabbit-hole, beetee?
originally posted by: Sutekh
Again Bruni is the only source, as she interviewed PC King directly. So to quote her:
"On the second night of the sightings (26/27), PC Dave King and PC Martin Brophy were in the Law Enforcement Office at Bentwaters when the report came in. Dave King recalls the incident:
"'It was a frosty night. I was doing my routine check with the Law Enforcement desk on RAF Bentwaters. We did that every night. We checked in with them and exchanged information. While I was there another report came in on the radio, a pocket radio, saying that there were lights in the forest at the exact same spot as the previous night. This would now be the early hours of the 27th. I was just about to go and have a look, thinking I might see something this time, when I got an emergency call to attend to a post office break-in about ten miles away at Otley.'
"I asked King if there was a report filed in the police log for this sighting.
"'No, we didn’t bother with it; we just thought they were bored watching their planes, and besides we
had an emergency on.'"
So if this is reliable, the call into the base was on the night of 26th/27th, the shift after PC Creswell had visited the presumed landing site. And PC King did not make a report, which is why we have no log entry. There should, of course, be a log entry about the suspected break in, in Otley. So that could be asked for under FOI, I suppose. If it is there in the log, then it happened as PC King suggested. If there is no such entry, then there might be a suggestion of police logs for 26th December evening to 30th December morning being suppressed.
originally posted by: Sutekh
This seems to be a faithful reproduction of the copy in Bruni. The light through the trees is clearly brighter than the foreground, which has been lit by flash. There is more light evident to the right, suggesting that the camera is pointed to the North-East if the landing site is where it is alleged to have been. The edge of the forest looks like it is not that far distant. As for the low level of light penetration, that is not unusual for a managed pine forest. I go walking in a number near where I live. Because the trees are in regular lines and tending to be equidistant from each other, unless you are looking directly down a row the trunks seem to form an almost constant barrier to the light as they diminish to the vanishing point. The picture is consistent with this.
originally posted by: Sutekh
So when did Penniston go back into the forest? (I don't believe Burroughs did later that day; as I said that was likely just poetic licence to keep Penniston's part anonymous in 1991). Well it looks like it was before sunset which was just before 4 pm. It was obviously sometime after 10:30 am that he met PC Creswell, though he could have gotten there earlier. Ipswich was an hour return journey. I suppose the determining factor would be PC Creswell's response time to the call out. Can I ask why this timing is so critical?
originally posted by: Sutekh
Apologies for being new to all this, but has anyone done a FOI request of the Americans for the other witness statements which were or were likely to have been collected as a result of the other nights. There is also the statement that Penniston alleges he wrote himself.
And one further naive question: has anyone considered that there might have been two nights of incidents involving Halt? The 27th/28th in which Larry Warren was a witness (along with Sgt J.D. Ingalls, SP Dog Handler Wayne ?Surname, Steve Longero and from a distance Gary Collins (civilian)), and then the 28th/29th on which Halt ran around a little aimlessly and made his tape? I have a problem with the dates given by early testimony (aside from the Halt memo, which is a problem in itself).
I love how the sheep element of this silly UFO fan club want me to prove that something didn't happen. For those of you who think that calling people liars is offensive, well it's my opinion and I'm entitled to my opinion. These idiots calling for justice for the 81st SPS Rendlesham story-tellers are a disgrace to the unit, the wing and the USAF. Let me make it exceptionally clear that no one in officialdom gives them any credence.
Justice... jesus christ, justice for what? Why can't anyone explain just what is the injustice done to these guys? When these guys prove their story I'll be happy to apologize and retract my opinion that they are just blowing smoke up people's asses. You wanna be a serious student of UFOlogy, then do your job and ask serious, hard, probing questions. Don't accept fuzzy, twisted, contorted rambling theories. The credibility of your little hobby is at stake.
originally posted by: ConfusedBrit
Rather than immediately embracing a 'cover up', we need to consider that Night 1 was a genuine investigation of a suspected aircraft crash, supported by radar...
originally posted by: KilgoreTrout
Is it supported by radar?
I know this has been discussed before but I perhaps went away with the wrong end of the stick. I didn't think that there was any evidence that anything had been sighted on radar for the period in question.
On checking the radar he realized there was indeed something on their approach line, and at first he thought it was a helicopter. However, it remained stationary long enough for it to show up for three to four sweeps across their screens before it dissipated.
“They were very jumpy and panicky on the phone…but I personally checked the radar picture and there was absolutely nothing to be seen. They kept coming back and implying there should be something but we kept a watch on it through the whole period and nothing was seen.”
Would these routine visits by the local police have been logged at the Law Enforcement Office? Presumably everyone in and out of the base had to be accounted for in some kind of visitors book or the such like??
I think it is quite sometime before sunset. My guess would be no later than 2-ish.
The timing isn't critical, just interesting, I'm just interested in this part of the story at the moment and following through on Conrad's claim that the police visit was at 7 pm. I think that the general concensus is that he was mistaken. I'm still exploring his comment that AFOSI wouldn't have been interrogating personnel over lights in the woods because they were far too busy investigating "security leaks" and "drug trafficking". Penniston rolling up with his crafting supplies stuffed into a back pack and strolling off into the woods doesn't indicate that any of that alertness was directed towards the woods.
originally posted by: KilgoreTrout
a reply to: ConfusedBrit
I have at last got around to re-watching Twin Peaks.
It's soooo good, I can't believe I left it this long.