It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Avenatti releases name and account of accuser

page: 17
22
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: SlapMonkey

originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
The deposition of Julie Swetnick

A2D

Well, those are serious allegations--some of which are hearsay, but nonetheless, quite serious.

Of course, they fly in the face of what many others have said about his demeanor and character during the same years, so yet again, we now have a he-said-she-said instance where there are claimed witnesses that have yet to corroborate anything.

What a sh*t show, but at the same time, if it's true, we need to know, because now we have an accusation that does NOT have a one-year statute of limitations. Rape is much more serious than saying 'maybe he put his penis in my face.'

As with everything else, we now wait and see.

Thanks for sharing the link.


It's not a deposition...its just a statement from her. Nothing legal or sworn about it. There is no notary or witness stamp or signature.

They are trying to make it look like a legal doc....




posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: loam


absolutely!! investigate, ffs!



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: soberbacchus

It's not the FBI's jurisdiction.

It never has been no matter how often the Democrats lie to you and say otherwise.


It is entirely in the jurisdiction of the FBI Background check process.
Do you not think they investigate sexual misconduct?

I was interviewed by the FBI once about a roommate in college (25 years prior at the time).
He was applying at an alphabet agency.
The agent rattled off all multiple college friends that were smoking pot or using '___' at the time. People that I had completely forgotten about. He knew the girls my friend had dated in college etc.

The FBI conducts BACKGROUND CHECKS, not just criminal investigations.

They conduct background checks on Judicial Nominees at the direction of POTUS.

Absent that direction, they do not conduct the checks or re-open checks, like they did with the Anita Hill allegations.


You realize that this post of yours highlights just how stupid it is to believe that the FBI never caught wind of any of these allegations during any of the 6 background checks right?

You do realize that right?

Thanks for blowing everything you've said the last 3 days out of the water with this one beautifully tone deaf post!

You do realize what you just did right?

Too funny!!!



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
i.redd.it... no idea who this guy is but heres a tweet, wouldnt she as an adult while kavanaugh was a minor be guilty of a good deal more charges what with going to parties with minors while alcohol was alleged to be present? wouldn't that be contributing to delinquency of multiple minors if she she allegedly furnished the alcohol and if she Did have sex with kavanaugh as she alleges wouldn't that make her a statutory rapist? as she was between 19-20 at the time?


Avenatti forgot about that.

💥😃💥


Avennatti wants to run for President. Please Lord Jesus make it happen!?



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:52 PM
link   
a reply to: knoxie

I have no problem with this, but someone had BETTER GO TO JAIL after all is said and done.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: loam


absolutely!! investigate, ffs!


They cant....none of the accusers have made a statement under oath or legally binding.

Wonder why? They could easily got to a notary and make the same statement and sign it in front of one, making it a sworn statement. They could do it with any notary anywhere. They havent....and there is a reason they havent.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus
That venue has been chosen by the GOP who wholly control the process.

If the GOP wholly controlled the process, this discussion would not be taking place.

Again, partisanship is self-imposed blindness.

You don't have to be a Republican to see this entire spectacle for precisely what it is: a cynical ploy to manipulate the sentiments and fears of women and sexual assault victims for political advantage.

I sincerely wish disgust for and rejection of such flagrant and revolting tactics wasn't considered partisan, but such is the pathetic reality of a bipolar political system which represents nothing more than the self-interest of the elitists who control it instead of those whom they control through it.

One thing this sort of groupthink does do, however, is repel those who don't subscribe to it.

I pray there are enough of us left to stand against it.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Malcador

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: PokeyJoe

Silly crap?

I'm sorry but I didn't go around drugging women without them knowing so they could be raped later.

This isn't a silly crap situation. It's a criminal one.


It is, but a criminal situation of that magnitude - a rape gang in operation that is supposedly holding parties for the exress purpose of slipping girls roofies so they can gang rape them, over and over, at multiple parties like this allegation describes?

You would think that kind of thing would be quickly uncovered, ratted out, what have you and taken down ... oh, you know, back in the '80s when it "approximately" happened.


It literally takes an insane person to believe that the FBI wouldn't have stumbled across this stuff during the course of 6 background checks.

Honestly, you would have to be insane to believe that.


You also have to believe that if this sort of thing was true, there wouldn't be such a huge number of women supporting him like there are. Not only that, but the witnesses wouldn't have all backed away from the women's accounts like they were hot potatoes.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Let them come. I could use the publicity.

A2D



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: xtradimensions


Only issue with that is she is described as black. The pics the media is showing of her she certainly doesn't look like she is black to me. Like I said, it is very strange that the only Julie Swetnick is on Mylife. She is a ghost otherwise.....


Sorry I am still back on page 11! I have been trying to find a photo of the accuser since there was some consternation on her description vs photo. Unfortunately, the only image and reference thatI could find of her was in the 1978 class yearbook.

The class image is grainy, but perhaps someone can tweak her out of it and determine if this accuser is even the real Julie Swetnik?

1978 class pics with Julie Swetnik

Okay, going to go read and catch up on the thread again.


Apparently she has an older brother Alvin. 1 year older.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: soberbacchus

It's not the FBI's jurisdiction.

It never has been no matter how often the Democrats lie to you and say otherwise.


It is entirely in the jurisdiction of the FBI Background check process.
Do you not think they investigate sexual misconduct?

I was interviewed by the FBI once about a roommate in college (25 years prior at the time).
He was applying at an alphabet agency.
The agent rattled off all multiple college friends that were smoking pot or using '___' at the time. People that I had completely forgotten about. He knew the girls my friend had dated in college etc.

The FBI conducts BACKGROUND CHECKS, not just criminal investigations.

They conduct background checks on Judicial Nominees at the direction of POTUS.

Absent that direction, they do not conduct the checks or re-open checks, like they did with the Anita Hill allegations.


Wow.

It sounds like these fbi checks are very thorough.

Strange then when they did six of them on kavanaugh they didnt pick up the litany of girls gang raped he was connected to.

So are you saying these thorough background checkers that impressed you missed the fact he was attending gang rape parties for three years with tons of people?



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: soberbacchus

It's not the FBI's jurisdiction.

It never has been no matter how often the Democrats lie to you and say otherwise.


It is entirely in the jurisdiction of the FBI Background check process.
Do you not think they investigate sexual misconduct?

I was interviewed by the FBI once about a roommate in college (25 years prior at the time).
He was applying at an alphabet agency.
The agent rattled off all multiple college friends that were smoking pot or using '___' at the time. People that I had completely forgotten about. He knew the girls my friend had dated in college etc.

The FBI conducts BACKGROUND CHECKS, not just criminal investigations.

They conduct background checks on Judicial Nominees at the direction of POTUS.

Absent that direction, they do not conduct the checks or re-open checks, like they did with the Anita Hill allegations.


Ha....so on a virtual nobody they found all the people he had ever done drugs with in a single background check.



Well, technically they had an undercover DEA agent on campus at the time posing as a student. He partied at our apartment on a regular basis. Still cracks me up. He was a nice guy. It explains how a bunch of people we knew got arrested that year.



But on Kav they have done 6 already and never found a single person that helped him gangrape multiple women at apparently dozens of parties....right....


Right. It depends on what they look for and how deep they dig. SCOTUS is a different ballpark. Trump (like Bush did with his own nominee Thomas) needs to tell the FBI to look into it, if for no other reason than to remove doubt.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:59 PM
link   
  • Why did Swetnick continue to attend these rape parties if she knew they were rape parties?

  • Why did Swetnick not provide names of corroborating witnesses from this supposedly huge list of girls who were raped?

  • Why did Swetnick wait until this last minute before coming forward?

  • Why are there no police reports of complaints about these rape parties?

  • How did the FBI miss uncovering allegations of this, despite six separate background investigations, the first occurring a mere 11 years after the supposed events?
One thing is for certain... the next time I go walking through a cow pasture, I will be careful not to step in any avernattis.

This is no longer about the Supreme Court. Felony charges have been attested to under oath. Swetnick should now be forced to swear out a warrant with the authorities or face felony charges herself. If the FBI can locate credible corroborating evidence, then Brett Kavanaugh should be removed from the Supreme Court and charged with multiple counts of rape. If no corroborating evidence can be found, Swetnick should be charged with either malicious prosecution, or at least a violation of 18 U.S. Code § 4. Either way, a line has now been crossed and someone needs to be in a Federal penitentiary.

I would also say that, should Swetnick be found guilty of a felony, another investigation into Michael Avernatti should be launched to determine if he is guilty of sedition for trying to improperly affect the legal processes of the US government.

No more games. This just got serious.

TheRedneck



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Majic

One thing this sort of groupthink does do, however, is repel those who don't subscribe to it.

I pray there are enough of us left to stand against it.


Stand against it how? To me this seems like the ultimate trump card. What recourse meaningfully exists? The mid-terms?



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: soberbacchus

It's not the FBI's jurisdiction.

It never has been no matter how often the Democrats lie to you and say otherwise.


It is entirely in the jurisdiction of the FBI Background check process.
Do you not think they investigate sexual misconduct?

I was interviewed by the FBI once about a roommate in college (25 years prior at the time).
He was applying at an alphabet agency.
The agent rattled off all multiple college friends that were smoking pot or using '___' at the time. People that I had completely forgotten about. He knew the girls my friend had dated in college etc.

The FBI conducts BACKGROUND CHECKS, not just criminal investigations.

They conduct background checks on Judicial Nominees at the direction of POTUS.

Absent that direction, they do not conduct the checks or re-open checks, like they did with the Anita Hill allegations.


Wow.

It sounds like these fbi checks are very thorough.

Strange then when they did six of them on kavanaugh they didnt pick up the litany of girls gang raped he was connected to.



They are hearing it now.

Strange Trump refuses to task them with following up.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

There’s no need, now that this info is released to the public people are going to say anything. That’s why you do these background checks before high level clearances.
edit on 26-9-2018 by avgguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 02:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheRedneck
  • Why did Swetnick continue to attend these rape parties if she knew they were rape parties?

  • Why did Swetnick not provide names of corroborating witnesses from this supposedly huge list of girls who were raped?

  • Why did Swetnick wait until this last minute before coming forward?

  • Why are there no police reports of complaints about these rape parties?

  • How did the FBI miss uncovering allegations of this, despite six separate background investigations,



Questions fit for the FBI to ask her.

Unfortunately that is not the plan.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

Or investigators , Grassley offered for them to testify under penalty of felony.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 02:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: loam
Stand against it how? To me this seems like the ultimate trump card. What recourse meaningfully exists? The mid-terms?

Honor, integrity and courage.

They are kryptonite to those who lack them.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

if shes lying she just completely ended her job and any future prospects of working in government as she maintains many security clearances heavy.com... heres heavys fast facts on the accuser ,and with her apparnently sword statment at this point some one is going to jail kavanaugh if the claims can be proven or his accuser if she can not prove it




top topics



 
22
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join