It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Looks Like the Christine Ford Letter is a Big Fraud

page: 8
78
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 08:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Fallingdown

The left knows they have the FBI in their pocket though, so they don't worry about that.

Jaden




posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 08:51 PM
link   
This is who will question Christine Ford on Thursday:


Republicans have reportedly settled on the head sex-crime investigator for Maricopa County, Arizona, as the person who will handle the questioning of Judge Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser.
www.washingtontimes.com...



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 08:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
This is who will question Christine Ford on Thursday:


Republicans have reportedly settled on the head sex-crime investigator for Maricopa County, Arizona, as the person who will handle the questioning of Judge Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser.
www.washingtontimes.com...


Sounds like the perfect choice from the perfect place !!

Ford's lawyer is gonna accuse the investigator of profiling !!

Wait for it πŸ˜ƒ



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
This is who will question Christine Ford on Thursday:


Republicans have reportedly settled on the head sex-crime investigator for Maricopa County, Arizona, as the person who will handle the questioning of Judge Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser.
www.washingtontimes.com...


Sounds like the perfect choice from the perfect place !!

Ford's lawyer is gonna accuse the investigator of profiling !!

Wait for it πŸ˜ƒ


Feinstein and Libs are LIVID. Ford's "interrogator" is a registered Republican!

BOOM! hollywoodlife.com...

If they had enough intuition and brains to win elections, they wouldn't have to WHINE and COMPLAIN for a living.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
This is who will question Christine Ford on Thursday:


Republicans have reportedly settled on the head sex-crime investigator for Maricopa County, Arizona, as the person who will handle the questioning of Judge Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser.
www.washingtontimes.com...


Sounds like the perfect choice from the perfect place !!

Ford's lawyer is gonna accuse the investigator of profiling !!

Wait for it


Feinstein and Libs are LIVID. Ford's "interrogator" is a registered Republican!

BOOM! hollywoodlife.com...

If they had enough intuition and brains to win elections, they wouldn't have to WHINE and COMPLAIN for a living.



Sinking ships should always serve the best Port Whine available !!

πŸ˜Žβš–πŸ˜Ž



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: SKEPTEK

originally posted by: xuenchen
An expert has analyzed the "Ford Letter" written to Senator Diane Feinstein and has exposed some obvious problems that indicate the thing is a fraud.

Not surprised because Democrats often use fraud and con games to make their points especially when they are as desperate as they are now.

Things like writing style and punctuation are reviewed.

Big Democrat fraud, and I bet "Dr Ford" never testifies at all.

πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈπŸ‘‹


Docume nt Expert: Multiple Discrepancies Discovered in Senator Feinstein’s Christine Ford Letter – Looks Like a Fraud

Yesterday Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal released a series of tweets that dissect and refute the letter provided by Senator Feinstein from the accuser of Judge Kavanaugh. Dr. Ford’s letter is full of flaws which lead one to realize something just doesn’t add up!

Dr. β€˜Dossy’ Blumenthal states that she believes Ford’s letter is written by a third party –


It's a template they had for a time like this.

Just fill in the names, time, and place.

Disgusting people.


In this particular case, they had no time, and no place. I guess one out of three is sufficient, as long as your only goal is to stall.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

Feinstein and Libs are LIVID. Ford's "interrogator" is a registered Republican!

BOOM! hollywoodlife.com...



Oh the irony here; does she have 13 republican lawyers lined up with her?




posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:25 PM
link   
IAMTAT just found this .........

Proof Hillary Clinton behind Kavanaugh smear campaign

πŸ’₯πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ’₯



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: carewemust

Feinstein and Libs are LIVID. Ford's "interrogator" is a registered Republican!

BOOM! hollywoodlife.com...



Oh the irony here; does she have 13 republican lawyers lined up with her?


Sorry, but that went over my head, BTS.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
IAMTAT just found this .........

Proof Hillary Clinton behind Kavanaugh smear campaign

πŸ’₯πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ’₯
this is worth it's own thread.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:31 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


If President Trump was feeling a litle leniency towards sickly Hillary, I hope this incident rekindles his "You'd Be in Jail" campaign promise.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
IAMTAT just found this .........

Proof Hillary Clinton behind Kavanaugh smear campaign

πŸ’₯πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ’₯

This person does some excellent deep research.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: MRinder

originally posted by: xuenchen
IAMTAT just found this .........

Proof Hillary Clinton behind Kavanaugh smear campaign

πŸ’₯πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ’₯
this is worth it's own thread.

Please do.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: MRinder

originally posted by: xuenchen
IAMTAT just found this .........

Proof Hillary Clinton behind Kavanaugh smear campaign

πŸ’₯πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ’₯
this is worth it's own thread.


I stuck that info in as many threads as I could find this afternoon/evening, but was hoping someone else would start one.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:37 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Robert Mueller and his team of 13 angry democrats....




posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: carewemust

Robert Mueller and his team of 13 angry democrats....



OH.. Thank-you.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 09:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
IAMTAT just found this .........

Proof Hillary Clinton behind Kavanaugh smear campaign

πŸ’₯πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ’₯


Back in July...






posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:33 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Some of the phrases have the grammar of Chinese/English.
Certainly not a letter written by someone of her education and experience.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 11:34 PM
link   
Thinking back to when I was a Democrat, I was so hateful and miserable. My thought process was β€œat any and all costs”. Of course I remember it vividly, and I was proud. Now I don’t know what the hell I was thinking except extremely naive with a ton of arrogance. Those are the best words that describe who I was. I was a very good one, accosting other people for the same things I did but worse. I think I was around 28 when I realized what a fool I was and really embarrassed. I wanted to apologize to all the people I prejudged who looked at me with pity. I see what they saw now and why they didn’t get angry. It was just an awakening. It would be a curious thread for people to explain honestly why they feel the way they do. I don’t think I can make threads. Not a Mud Pit or anything, just an honest conversation(if that’s even possible). I think it would help people understand each other and realize maybe we can understand why a person feels the way they do, where they are in life, etc. Where you are(not physically) is a very telling and honest way, and I get it. Boy do I ever. I suppose because I’ve been there. Liberalism is a very comfortable ideology if you can play nice.



posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 01:16 AM
link   
Part of the so-called expert's hypothesis is flawed. Using an apostrophe when stating a year is considered archaic, but not technically wrong. It has now become common usage to omit the apostrophe, but it was common until around 1985. Many style manuals didn't update plural dates until the early nineties.

Also many spell check programs will attempt to add the apostrophe. Microsoft word also makes suggestions to "dumb down" sentence complexity.



new topics

top topics



 
78
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join