It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Looks Like the Christine Ford Letter is a Big Fraud

page: 4
78
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian

originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: theantediluvian

I forgot a post on ATS is an official letter to Congress, my bad. Care to address the inconsistencies?


I'll play along. Let's look at one of the tweets, selected at random.


31) “a very drunken Judge said mixed words to Kavanaugh” — this is the writing of either an illiterate or someone for whom English is a second language.

—“Very drunken”? She means “very drunk.”
—“Mixed words?” She means “said contradictory things.”


Who uses an em dash as a bullet point? Hoax!

Sarcasm aside, let's consider the would be points made here.


—“Very drunken”? She means “very drunk.”


Wrong. "Drunken" is an adjective. "Drunk" can be a verb, adjective or noun.

Merriam-Webster - drunken


drunken adjective
drunk·en | ˈdrəŋ-kən

Definition of drunken

1 : drunk sense 1 a drunken driver

2 obsolete : saturated with liquid

3a : given to habitual excessive use of alcohol

b : of, relating to, or characterized by intoxication they come from … broken homes, drunken homes —P. B. Gilliam

c : resulting from or as if from intoxication a drunken brawl

4 : unsteady or lurching as if from alcoholic intoxication


Cambridge English Dictionary - drunken


drunken adjective [ before noun ]
uk ​ /ˈdrʌŋ.kən/ us ​ /ˈdrʌŋ.kən/ disapproving

A drunken person is (often) under the influence of alcohol:
She was convicted of murdering her drunken and allegedly violent husband.
The square filled up with drunken baseball fans.

used to describe a situation in which a lot of alcohol has been drunk:
a drunken brawl
He came home and fell into a drunken stupor (= sleep).


And now the other would be point:


—“Mixed words?” She means “said contradictory things.”


Here's the sentence again:

From across the room, a very drunken Judge said mixed words to Kavanaugh ranging from "go for it" to "stop".

She's interpreting "mixed words" to mean "contradictory" but it could just as easily be interpreted as "a mixture of words" which fits better in the context.

There you go. What does any of this have to do with anything anyway? Whether she typed the letter herself, dictated it verbatim or allowed somebody to compose it for her based on her input is of no real importance when considering the validity of her allegation.


It's extremely important when its an allegation she cannot prove anyway.




posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:56 PM
link   
The letter was carefully worded to avoid a felonious sex act in Maryland. As such is is subject to a 6 year statute of limitations. If you look up their sex assault laws, based on her letter, which is the ONLY admissible proof so far, it falls under 4th degree which is a misdemeanor.

She cant file charges and never intended to. They dont want Kav in jail...they know he is a good guy. They just dont want him on the SC. So they chose to smear him.

Same reason for them saying the FBI should investigate....they already knew they wouldn't and couldn't. The FBI had already said it wouldn't before they asked for it.

This was a plain and simple smear campaign. Check her letter versus the sexual assault laws in Maryland....the perfectly tuned it....even stating that Judge was across the room so there would not be a second party involved making it a 3rd degree and a felony.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: NightFlight
Ya'll don't worry none. I hear she's not going to make it on Thursday.

She got lost in AlbuQuerQue!


It DOESN'T matter, mission accomplished by the Dems!
If it was resolved even tomorrow and the vote taken,
Judge Kav would still have a seat the next session of
SCOTUS. But Thursday is after the cutoff period: the
stall worked, whether Ford shows up or not.

k/ I believe it's time for me to begin drinkinking heavily
and clean the Mossberg with one in the hole. /kidding
Accusations however nebulon seem to carry some kind
of political traction like the good ol' USSR...woohoo.

PS if we need to talk about Hilz going missing, could
there be at least some consensus about salt mining?
Maybe even half days with the license plate press...



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
Wowser. You all will cling to anything. The moon is yellow which means she is lying.

Truth is she sought counseling after the incident and there is a record of such. So she either came up with whole plan 35 years ago or she is not lying.

There were questionable occurrences in my youth, I remember the incidents but couldn't put an exact date / year on them.


The facts are she seeked marriage counseling in 2012 and apparently shared a story of 4 boys attacking her to explain away to her husband why they were having relationship issues. She obviously was trying to save her marriage!

So no, she did not have to come up with this plan 35 years ago. Only more recently did it seem useful. Easy peasy to now say the therapist was in error. That may explain more why the 3 boys and 1 girl are completely clueless to such a party she is referring to, eh?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:59 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian


She's interpreting "mixed words" to mean "contradictory" but it could just as easily be interpreted as "a mixture of words" which fits better in the context.


You, yourself, just had to fix that. So you don't like "contradictory"? Fine, but I note that you did not leave it as it was written either. You fixed it by amending "mixed" to "mixture".

And you also ignored the other points.

And taken altogether, the statement you're messing with is awkward in its phrasing as written. That's what is referred to by polish. Something like what you see might technically be correct, but it's not maybe the best way to phrase something which is why we draft and rewrite.

One would expect formal communications of importance to be drafted and reviewed and rewritten.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
Looks like Ms Ford's goose is cooked.

Now the creepy porn lawyer has been caught too taking phony accusations
and putting them forth as the real deal.

thehill.com...

Then creepy porn lawyer sets his twitter to private to try and hide.

Charles Grassley just told Feinstein NO to another request to delay.

To the operatives who are trying to overthrow the U.S. legal system,
Put Up Or Shut Up!

Games Up!!


lol, this is getting entertaining. If true, looks like Satan's advocate got hoaxed.

And offered $75,000 for more?




posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

Why are Democrats upset over this female prosecutor questioning Christine Ford on Thursday?

www.cnn.com...

Because they won't be able to spin it as the big mean man bullying the poor helpless woman.

They're already offering all manner of lame excuses why she might miss the hearing.


I hear the Republicans are going to use a disabled, black transgender as their prosecutor just to really cover all the bases.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
Wowser. You all will cling to anything. The moon is yellow which means she is lying.

Truth is she sought counseling after the incident and there is a record of such. So she either came up with whole plan 35 years ago or she is not lying.

There were questionable occurrences in my youth, I remember the incidents but couldn't put an exact date / year on them.


The facts are she seeked marriage counseling in 2012 and apparently shared a story of 4 boys attacking her to explain away to her husband why they were having relationship issues. She obviously was trying to save her marriage!

So no, she did not have to come up with this plan 35 years ago. Only more recently did it seem useful. Easy peasy to now say the therapist was in error. That may explain more why the 3 boys and 1 girl are completely clueless to such a party she is referring to, eh?


Seems like if an event like that was going to strain a marriage, shouldn't it also strain the relationship prior to the marriage?
edit on 25-9-2018 by Wardaddy454 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:01 PM
link   
First: I think she is either blatantly lying, or is being played by a foreign interest that wants control of the US that they had under the last Administrations (guess who that my be)

Second: I don't really care about her grammar. My college English Professor and I were talking the other day (yes I'm out of college, but still hang out with some of my Professors), and the quotable comment was made;

"If more people read Hamilton, instead of watching Hamilton, than I wouldn't have to drink as much while correcting these papers"


So just because she holds a Doctorate, doesn't mean that she can spell well without proof reading her stuff. It just means that she has put the time in to learning things that doesn't require her to know words off the top of her head. There's nothing wrong with that as long as she can be understood.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Guyfriday

And so long as everyone believes all that, I will still have my job.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Why is it I believe a couple of anonymous 4-Chan users more than I do Avernatti?

TheRedneck



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

I do not believe she is looking to press charges. She just wants the people to know what kind of man he is. That something like this is within his character.
I keep asking, what is so spectacular about this guy that they can't just move on to the next candidate for the position?
Say Buh Bye and have a nice life.
NEXT...
Is he the last one available... I think there are a lot of federal judges to choose from.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
Wowser. You all will cling to anything. The moon is yellow which means she is lying.

Truth is she sought counseling after the incident and there is a record of such. So she either came up with whole plan 35 years ago or she is not lying.

There were questionable occurrences in my youth, I remember the incidents but couldn't put an exact date / year on them.


The facts are she seeked marriage counseling in 2012 and apparently shared a story of 4 boys attacking her to explain away to her husband why they were having relationship issues. She obviously was trying to save her marriage!

So no, she did not have to come up with this plan 35 years ago. Only more recently did it seem useful. Easy peasy to now say the therapist was in error. That may explain more why the 3 boys and 1 girl are completely clueless to such a party she is referring to, eh?


Seems like if an event like that was going to strain a marriage, shouldn't it also strain the relationship prior to the marriage?



Meh, dating is a game! Not sure if you are married or ever have been, but in my experience premarriage the gloves come off in the sack. After marriage, they NEVER did the things you said they did before.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:08 PM
link   
a reply to: ausername

Someone took a screenshot of the details...
heavy.com...

It makes sense, otherwise why would Avenatti have closed off his twitter all of the sudden?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Vasa Croe

I do not believe she is looking to press charges. She just wants the people to know what kind of man he is. That something like this is within his character.
I keep asking, what is so spectacular about this guy that they can't just move on to the next candidate for the position?
Say Buh Bye and have a nice life.
NEXT...
Is he the last one available... I think there are a lot of federal judges to choose from.


She cant press charges.

And how is something like this within his character? She is lying and continues to.

I'll bet you my dog she doesnt show up Thursday.

Why move on when we have a great candidate already?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Why should he? What evidence is there he did something wrong?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Vasa Croe

I do not believe she is looking to press charges. She just wants the people to know what kind of man he is. That something like this is within his character.
I keep asking, what is so spectacular about this guy that they can't just move on to the next candidate for the position?
Say Buh Bye and have a nice life.
NEXT...
Is he the last one available... I think there are a lot of federal judges to choose from.


If she doesnt want charges pressed, why insist on the fbni investigating?

She could just tell her story to the people in a public setting.

Yet she is stalling and making ridiculous demands.

Now the second accuser is also saying she wont testify or give a statement to the senate.

Sounds to me like they arent interested in the public hearing them out.

They are more interested in just smearing brett than giving public testimony.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Well you know what they say about people like Ms Ford;

Drag a hundred dollar bill through a trailer park and you never
know what you might find....




edit on 25-9-2018 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Vasa Croe

I do not believe she is looking to press charges. She just wants the people to know what kind of man he is. That something like this is within his character.
I keep asking, what is so spectacular about this guy that they can't just move on to the next candidate for the position?
Say Buh Bye and have a nice life.
NEXT...
Is he the last one available... I think there are a lot of federal judges to choose from.


So you're ok with a man's life and career being destroyed with an unsubstantiated, uncorroborated allegation from decades ago?

Really?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 05:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Translation:

She just wants to ruin his life because she doesn't like his judicial philsophy, so suddenly, she maybe remembers something he might have done but she has no proof and BELIEVE HER OR ELSE YOU HATE WOMEN!




top topics



 
78
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join