It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Creepy Porn Lawyer, now knows Kavanaugh is lying due to his virginity.

page: 8
24
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude




yes, he pays whores to have sex with him. Do you have an issue with that?


Do you have an issue with a an attorney representing the very whores that got paid to have sex with the creepy porn president?



Only when his angle is that somehow she was victimized for taking part in a business transaction.

I thought you leftists were all about strong women being able to do what they wanted with their bodies?

So if the president and Stormy Daniels hooked up in a consensual manner years before he decided to run for office, how is she know a victim because he became president? Somehow Avenatti thinks she is and that's the creepy part.

As for Trump being a philanderer, don't you think the better part of America didn't already know that if they were paying attention to celeb culture at all?

Just like we know about the skeletons in the Clinton closet too.

There was no moral high ground to be claimed there, but the left just doesn't want to see that.




posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: vor78

originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: network dude

Damn...at this point, at least try to make the claims believable, Dems!

#NeverLetAGoodCrisisGoToWaste



I hate to defend the Dems, I really, really do, but at least some of the smarter ones seem to be trying to distance themselves from this garbage.

www.politico.com...


No they arent level headed my man. They claim in that article that the "level headed" Dems believe that the Ramirez claims are credible despite every witness she named basically saying she's full of it.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:19 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko




I thought you leftists were all about strong women being able to do what they wanted with their bodies?


This isn't about Stormy Daniels. It's about demonizing her lawyer, calling him a "creepy porn lawyer", while we have a creepy porn president in the White House. It's about demonizing his new client because of his client, Stormy Daniels.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ketsuko




I thought you leftists were all about strong women being able to do what they wanted with their bodies?


This isn't about Stormy Daniels. It's about demonizing her lawyer, calling him a "creepy porn lawyer", while we have a creepy porn president in the White House. It's about demonizing his new client because of his client, Stormy Daniels.





And that's a good point.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude


Creepy Porn Lawyer wouldn't even have a platform if not for Creepy Porn President.


Do you have any proof that Trump actually slept with Daniels?

And no an NDA isn't proof and neither are her allegations. As of now I've yet to see any actual proof of her claims but if you have some by all means present your findings.

Oh that's right I forgot. You're one of those types that think women are infallible and incapable of lying so they must be believed no matter what and that's the only proof you'll ever need.

Sad.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ketsuko




I thought you leftists were all about strong women being able to do what they wanted with their bodies?


This isn't about Stormy Daniels. It's about demonizing her lawyer, calling him a "creepy porn lawyer", while we have a creepy porn president in the White House. It's about demonizing his new client because of his client, Stormy Daniels.

Avenatti is also politically well connected, and he has connections to Saudi royalty through his racing days.





You don't think it's sort of creepy that Rodriguez only suddenly definitely feels like she can say it was Kavanaugh after six intensive sessions with her lawyer?
edit on 25-9-2018 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: CriticalStinker


I think it's wrong to just introduce to society the notion that you can accuse someone of something 30+ years later and let it ruin their lives with no evidence.

This isn't a new thing with Kavanaugh. There are many women who wait many many years to grow the courage to come forward and report their sexual assaults.

Now, that said, if there is evidence I will take a different stance. Innocent until proven guilty though, right?

Sure but the GOP doesn't want the FBI to investigate and actually validate his innocence.


The women should file charges with the relevant authority's which would be the local police where the "alleged" assaults happened.

You know full well that the FBI doesn't investigate cases like this so stop perpetuating that lie.

By the way, I wonder WHY the women haven't taken this small step? Things that make you go hmmmm.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ketsuko




I thought you leftists were all about strong women being able to do what they wanted with their bodies?


This isn't about Stormy Daniels. It's about demonizing her lawyer, calling him a "creepy porn lawyer", while we have a creepy porn president in the White House. It's about demonizing his new client because of his client, Stormy Daniels.






Takes two to tango! Trump had the money and she had the goods!

Why you guys hatin on a player? Hell thought the Progs were all about sexual deviancy and cuckolding?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:26 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko


Nope. From what I understand, emails were flying around about the "Floppy Bandit" AKA Brett Kavanaugh, and old stories were being confirmed as early as July. Rodriquez and her attorney did their due diligence to confirm her memories.
edit on 25-9-2018 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude




But this is about Avanatti, not Trump.


It's about you co-opting the term "creepy porn lawyer", but not Trump as "creepy porn president".

You're insinuating Avanatti is a creep because he's representing the porn star who our creepy porn star loving president schtuped au naturale.


He's a creepy porn lawyer because he represents a porn actress(lol). Trump hasn't as far as I know been proven to have slept with her has he?

Unless you have some proof that no one else does of course. Do you, or just libelous slanders with no evidence?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Malcador


I really don't think that, at this point there's any doubt. Otherwise, why Cohen, the $130K and the NDA agreement? Why threaten to sue her for violating the NDA? Why try to legally restrain her from speaking, telling her story?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: vinifalou

Isn't it also funny how LEOs are horrible jack-booted thugs until they want them to do something?


Lol. That reminds of an Antifa video I saw where the idiots were chanting anti police slogans and as soon as one of them got decked they start screeching for the cops cause "we got effing assaulted".

I've actually saved that video because the stupidity of these leftist morons cracks me up daily.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:37 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963




Takes two to tango! Trump had the money and she had the goods!


So why vilify her lawyer? Why is Daniels a filthy slut, but Trump is just a tango partner?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:38 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

The problem there with what your doing is you have zero
evidence to be calling someone a rapist, is this the new
Democrat party?

Accuse everyone you feel politically threatened by of rape?

Just wait till those chickens come home to roost....




edit on 25-9-2018 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: seeker1963




Takes two to tango! Trump had the money and she had the goods!


So why vilify her lawyer? Why is Daniels a filthy slut, but Trump is just a tango partner?




Slut. Playa, words of description, thought that's what you progs were into? You know, categorizing everyone based on race, religion, sexuality etc etc..... Make up your freakin minds!



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: seeker1963




Takes two to tango! Trump had the money and she had the goods!


So why vilify her lawyer? Why is Daniels a filthy slut, but Trump is just a tango partner?



We still have no proof anything happened with her and Trump so theres that.

And does filthy prostitute sound better? She gets paid to screw people.....



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: ketsuko

I think there is a BIG difference between giving testimony and a sworn statement, and I think you should see that difference too if you were being honest with yourself.


Look.

One of the avenues for Ford to offer testimony was through Senate staffers sent to her which she refused. I don't need her to offer public testimony. She just needs to give her testimony and Kavanaugh needs to have a chance to defend against it.

Whether she does it publically or not doesn't matter to me. It just needs to happen.

She's the one who refused both the staffer route and to go it behind closed doors, which was also offered.


It matters to me very much. I want this chick in a packed room with 50 cameras forced to spin her fable in front on 350 million people.

Put the screws to her.

She won't show up though so it's irrelevant. The Dems will claim that all of the bullying by the Republicans made her scared for her life.

Or, they'll claim she's in witness protection due to all the crazy Republicans threatening her life, which they'll never provide any evidence that it actually happened.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:43 PM
link   
Someone "chose" Avenatti to represent them, despite seeing how well he did representing a porn star?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Burden of proof? We haven't even been able to have a proper investigation as Congress refuses to let the FBI investigate and actually collect evidence.


No the FBI refused because it is a local jurisdiction matter not theirs. She could go file charges if she could remember where it happened to file them...however that isn't what they want or her lawyer would already be on it.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 04:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Someone "chose" Avenatti to represent them, despite seeing how well he did representing a porn star?


Kinda why I believe he got rolled.....he was itching for the next media frenzy case.....probably didnt take much to get him completely hooked and he had to move really fast to stay ahead of the Thursday testimony so he bit hard.



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join