It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Creepy Porn Lawyer, now knows Kavanaugh is lying due to his virginity.

page: 11
24
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 06:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler




The dems alraedy had their say and sat obn allegations for 6 weeks, so I guess they didnt want to hear it as well.


The Dems didn't know about Deborah Ramirez' allegations 6 weeks ago. They didn't even know about her 1 week ago. There is no reason for the Republicans to ram rod this through without an FBI investigation into these allegations or allow witness testimony at the confirmation hearings.




posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 06:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ketsuko


Nope. From what I understand, emails were flying around about the "Floppy Bandit" AKA Brett Kavanaugh, and old stories were being confirmed as early as July. Rodriquez and her attorney did their due diligence to confirm her memories.


Source, or just another lie from the left?


I went looking for the Twitter feed showing the email chain and the video I watched discussing it just about an hour ago, and now, they're both gone, scubbed!



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 06:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ketsuko


Nope. From what I understand, emails were flying around about the "Floppy Bandit" AKA Brett Kavanaugh, and old stories were being confirmed as early as July. Rodriquez and her attorney did their due diligence to confirm her memories.


Source, or just another lie from the left?


I went looking for the Twitter feed showing the email chain and the video I watched discussing it just about an hour ago, and now, they're both gone, scubbed!


I bet those damn anonymous sources did it. Rat bastards.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 06:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: Stormdancer777


I went camping with Diane Feinstein once. I think she slipped me a roofy in my beer. I woke up the next morning and my anus hurt. She was long gone, but laying on the ground was a strap on!

To this day I struggle with gender identity because she made me feel like a woman.


True story!



I think you made out with the better deal...What if instead of her riding you, she forced you to ride her... I think I just threw up a little in my mouth...



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 06:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: carewemust




If they're willing to say that under oath


I hope they get the chance. If Republican have their say, they won't.



What did the R's do to hamper any of this? They let every bit of this disgusting fiasco go, so the left could go full retard. They did. But other than doing all they could to accommodate this lush, they have done nothing. But they won't wait until the left can play fiarzies and win.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 06:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

Yikes...if forced to, make sure to pull that rubber all the way up over the sack.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 06:52 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude




What did the R's do to hamper any of this?


they're refusing to allow the FBI ro re-open Kavanaugh's investigation. They're refusing to let witnesses testify. They're refusing to hear from anyone else but Christine Blasey Ford, while several others are still coming forward with allegations and testimony about Kavanaugh's behavior as a student at Georgetown and Yale.


edit on 25-9-2018 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 06:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude




What did the R's do to hamper any of this?


Why're refusing to allow the FBI ro re-open Kavanaugh's investigation. They're refusing to let witnesses testify. They're refusing to hear from anyone else but Christine Blasey Ford, while several others are still coming forward with allegations and testimony about Kavanaugh's behavior as a student at Georgetown and Yale.



You really need to study up on law in general. This isnt court.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 06:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe


It's a hearing to evaluate Brett Kavanaugh's fitness to be elevated to a Supreme Court Justice. Re-opening the FBI investigation to look into these new allegations is a no brainer.

If the Senate Judiciary Committee is sincere and really wants to vet SCOTUS nominees, it should hear all the allegations that pertain to Kavanaugh's honesty and truthfulness during this confirmation process. It's really not about his past behavior but his candor and honesty about his past now.

If he's misrepresenting himself now to the American people about things that happened in the past, the American people have the right to know. And if he's misrepresenting himself, then he shouldn't be confirmed.


edit on 25-9-2018 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

How does Ford, Rodriguez and a 4Chan Hoax qualify as "several others"?

Just curious.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

"They" ought to take those complaints and charges to the right place...the police in the jurisdiction it occured in and file a report and have their investigation and if there is anything there then have their day in court. This trial by public opinion is about as far from American ideal as could be and to see you and other support it shows how far we have slid down a slippery slope as a nation.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Sookiechacha

"They" ought to take those complaints and charges to the right place...the police in the jurisdiction it occured in and file a report and have their investigation and if there is anything there then have their day in court. This trial by public opinion is about as far from American ideal as could be and to see you and other support it shows how far we have slid down a slippery slope as a nation.




Then why not let due process take its course, an accusation has been made the man has a right to defend himself in court far away from the court of public opinion,.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Sookiechacha

"They" ought to take those complaints and charges to the right place...the police in the jurisdiction it occured in and file a report and have their investigation and if there is anything there then have their day in court. This trial by public opinion is about as far from American ideal as could be and to see you and other support it shows how far we have slid down a slippery slope as a nation.




Then why not let due process take its course, an accusation has been made the man has a right to defend himself in court far away from the court of public opinion,.


No, the formal accusation in the legal system has not been made.

The only real accusation has been made in the court of public opinion where it can best impact the political process, and that's all it's intended to do.

Maryland law enforcement would investigate if a report were filed. If she were serious, they would it, so why hasn't it been? Despite all her howling, all her moaning, all the sanctimonious hand wringing about how the American people deserve to know, blah, blah, blah, if this were really about justice after all this time ... there exists an avenue to use due process properly, but, huh, Ford doesn't seem to be interested in that at all.

Why?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:09 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

The only reason I can entertain is that its a giant distraction, something important is happening somewhere and nobody is paying attention to it.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude




What did the R's do to hamper any of this?


Why're refusing to allow the FBI ro re-open Kavanaugh's investigation. They're refusing to let witnesses testify. They're refusing to hear from anyone else but Christine Blasey Ford, while several others are still coming forward with allegations and testimony about Kavanaugh's behavior as a student at Georgetown and Yale.



You really need to study up on law in general. This isnt court.


No, it isn't court, it's congress, and it's the White House. They can do as they please, far more than any Court.

In Anita Hill's case, an FBI investigation was done, and Mitch McConnell insisted on it.


September 23, 1991: Biden says in a statement reported in the Times that this is the date on which Hill agreed to allow the FBI to investigate the allegations.

Then-White House deputy press secretary Judy Smith said in a statement published by Newsday on October 6, 1991, that Hill's allegations of harassment were "brought to the attention of the Judiciary Committee" on September 23 -- a time frame that differs from Hill's account -- and the committee "immediately" informed the White House. The White House then "promptly directed the FBI to conduct a full, thorough and expeditious investigation," according to the statement.

September 26, 1991: Three days later, the FBI completed its investigation, and a report was submitted to the White House and the Judiciary Committee, according to Smith's statement. "The White House reviewed the report and determined that the allegation was unfounded," the statement said.

September 27, 1991: The committee deadlocked 7-7 on whether to recommend the Senate confirm Thomas' nomination. The panel then voted 13-1 to send his nomination to the Senate floor without a recommendation.

October 6, 1991: National Public Radio's Nina Totenberg obtained a copy of the FBI report and reported on the allegations, the first time the public became aware of the story.

October 11, 1991: Hill testifies that Thomas had sexually harassed her while she worked with him at the Education Department and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Hill said Thomas frequently asked her out on dates and described his sexual interests to her. Thomas denies the allegations.



October 15, 1991: The Senate confirms Thomas in a 52-48 vote, the narrowest margin in the 20th century.


www.cnn.com...

And yes, they treated her like dirt, and although it is still shameful for them, they don't seem to learn from their mistakes.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:12 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko


Of course there are Ramirez' corroborators. And, there's Mark Judges memoirs about him and his friend, Bart O'Kavanaugh.

But, there's more. There's Kavanaugh's friend that says when he was a Freshman at Yale, he bragged about sexual conquests. Was he lying then or now? Mark Judges girlfriend, at the time, says she was made aware of the alleged "train of men" having sex with one drunk girl, and there is someone who wants to testify that Kavanaugh stopped them from stopping it.

There's the problem with Kavanaugh's underage drinking, that he says was legal, because the legal drinking age was 18. It wasn't. Kavanaugh was illegally drinking in High School and at Yale until he turned 21.

Oh yeah, there's the problem with Kavanaugh's repeated claim that he never disrespected women, but his High School Year Book says otherwise.

Again, it's really not about his past. It's about his candor and honesty now, as a nominee for the Supreme Court.


edit on 25-9-2018 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

Then those making such acusations need to take them where they belong not the senate not the media...to a police dept in jurisdiction! Thats why I feel that this is all bullish*t...they haven't yet done such a thing and its not ignorance because they're all represented by legal professionals...I use that word lightly in this case.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

If they have all this behind them why haven't any reports been filed...the way you tell it, it sounds like a slam dunk any lawyer would be jumping for.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

As Susan Collins said "if he did this, it's disqualifying, and if he lies about it, it's disqualifying."



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: RickyD

I can agree with that, this whole # show should not be for public consumption.




top topics



 
24
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join