It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

No man should ever vote for Democrats again!

page: 8
91
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




A quote, by a "classy, moral, ethical Republican woman" that suggests that high school boys normally rape little girls.

who was raped?
is that your own invention about this event?




posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:02 AM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

Nice try. Political parties were railed against by our founders, who specifically predicted this precise same bull# happening. As they said would happen (and has happened), the partisan nonsensical issues of the day are taking over and crowding out real issues that people actually give a damn about.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Whatever slur/link I won't bother to visit you throw out there, just know Republican ladies are 10 times the woman/human being any Democrat could ever dream of.

It is called being intrinsically better than someone/something else, and us flag waving/Constitution loving American Republicans certainly are.

Read Article 4 Section 4 US Constitution. Better yet, find me one spot in our founding documents that calls for a "Democracy" - none do.

Nope, you Dems have lost any possible sympathy/underdog support you had with me (and I'm not alone, believe that) with this latest SCOTUS nomination fiasco. A minority party attempting to obstruct public business? I don't think so. When we blocked Garland, we were still THE MAJORITY like we are now. Democrats were the MINORITY, and we didn't believe a MINORITY party President should be appointing the justice so the Senate MAJORITY refused to give him a hearing as is their right. The Democrat MINORITY party does not run the Senate and has no right even really opening its mouth. "Sit down and shut up"

edit on 9/25/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: LSU2018

There is a reason why dumb men continue to believe fake non-real Americans who are obsessed with sex/sex crimes. Women know how other women are, and generally won't give them to the time of day without physical hard evidence. Men, OTOH, especially "white knights" are generally pathetic #### cowards.

Anyone with a brain will demand evidence before believing a story someone wants to tell. Especially when this C. Fatty Ford won't even show up to testify. Why is our majority party even playing games with these lying leftist cows?


I don't know why they're playing these games but it's time to replace them with people who won't.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Your overarcing comment is blatantly absurd on its face: women (or men) are not virtuous because of their political party.

However, we have recently had at least one Republican woman who has stated in public approves of sexual predation on the part of teenage boys.

Is that virtuous? Your mileage may vary.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:11 AM
link   
No man should ever vote for Democrats again!

Why do you think sex robots are becoming the next big thing?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

No, that is where you're wrong.

I don't see this behavior coming from Republicans. And I absolutely will judge someone based on their politics at this point, because no decent Constitution loving patriot could support the farce that calls itself the Democrat party after seeing all they've seen. Especially after this # show they've put on in the Senate, obstructing public business and slinging unproven mere accusations around like they were proven facts (they are not).

Further, only one group has shown itself to be intelligent. I'll let you guess who:

1) The party who believes a mere accusation without evidence
2) The group who demands evidence to back up an accusation before taking it seriously

Hint: Only one of those groups of people are doing things the right way. The other group is wrong, completely. Very wrong, and wrong-headed also. About everything, really. Good for nothing Democrats do not make any good points, valuable contributions or any effort to uphold our Constitutional rights which is the only thing that actually matters. The one purpose of government is to uphold our unalienable rights...and Democrats would rather play their weird little sex-obsession allegation nonsense than do their job.

No thanks. No Democrat is worthy of this country/our founders/our Constitution. They are nothing more than pawns for far-left interests who seek to subvert our Republic and impose some authoritarian disgusting "democracy" mob-rule tyranny. FYI, Article 4 Section 4 says they will do no such thing. Which of course we would never permit.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

No one but the disgusting far-left radicals give two #s about the 24/7 sex-obsession nonsense. Most of us are not obsessed with sex/topics involving sex and do not feel the need to discuss it all the time.

I think they call that being petty/insecure vs. secure in your own person.


Sex crimes aren't the biggest problem facing this country. Sex crimes are easily prevented by an armed/aware/intelligent population. I'm far more concerned about upholding our unalienable rights and ensuring some highly unpopular fringe political group (socialist dems) aren't given the chance to subvert our precious Constitution/Republic as Article 4 Section 4 commands
edit on 9/25/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:20 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Great post as always !



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:22 AM
link   
a reply to: CADpro

I appreciate that CAD
I normally do not "go off" on the left like this, but after seeing the lies in the news day after day I have to speak up

This is ridiculous, and anybody that can't see this is just a political hack playing games needs to have their head examined! Avenatti getting involved, they might as well have brought in no-credibility Gloria Allred to do her typical "250 witnesses come out the wood work and then disappear without giving a sworn statement under oath" gambit.

The left is unhinged and out of control
edit on 9/25/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Gryphon66

No one but the disgusting far-left radicals give two #s about the 24/7 sex-obsession nonsense. Most of us are not obsessed with sex/topics involving sex and do not feel the need to discuss it all the time.

I think they call that being petty/insecure vs. secure in your own person.


Your emotionally-charged (and meaningless) rhetoric aside ... you don't speak for anyone but yourself. There are MANY Americans concerned about sexual abuse, etc., and they are certainly concerned when it is possible that a SCOTUS nominee is a serial abuser.

You can keep oversimplifying it to a partisan matter, but that's simply not true. You're merely practicing identity politics; all Democrats/Republicans are the same, they all think this, do that ... it's patently absurd.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Stop right there. Need to correct something you said.


and they are certainly concerned when it is possible that a SCOTUS nominee is a serial abuser.


It is POSSIBLE any person is a serial abuser/Russian spy/escaped criminal/space alien in disguise. But there is NO EVIDENCE indicating that is true. None whatsoever.

In fact, the accuser's witnesses wouldn't even back up her story.

So no, it should NOT be taken seriously when all evidence points to the story being NOT TRUE.

All you have to do is show me ONE SINGLE CREDIBLE allegation and I will sit down



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:28 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


all Democrats/Republicans are the same, they all think this, do that ... it's patently absurd.


OK Gryphon66 and just my luck I get the one Democrat (or leftist, however you identity) that isn't a partisan hack. Clearly my statement does not and can not apply to every single Democrat. I concede that

Surely you see the problem with allowing unproven allegations (without evidence to back it up) to hold up our public functions. Any person can hold up ANY congressional action just by accusing them of something without offering a lick of evidence? You can't see how that'd be dangerous?
edit on 9/25/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:32 AM
link   
Kind of creepy that some peoples blinders are so dark they haven't seen that a simple accusation with zero proof being provided or even an attempt for the accused to confront their accuser can absolutely train wreck a mans life.

Remember the duke lacross team, they were cleared yet there are still people that believe they were guilty and something like that can follow someone for years.

Luckily for Kavenaugh he has the money to fight the accusations (like the Duke players), but a lot of guys out there dont.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Gryphon66


all Democrats/Republicans are the same, they all think this, do that ... it's patently absurd.


OK Gryphon66 and just my luck I get the one Democrat (or leftist, however you identity) that isn't a partisan hack. Clearly my statement does not and can not apply to every single Democrat. I concede that


Your statement does, however, apply to every single Democrat that is calling for an FBI investigation. A lot of these congressmen are lawyers. They know about little things like jurisdiction. The FBI has no jurisdiction to investigate this. The immediate refrain here is that "well they investigated Anita Hill's accusation". They did, because she was a federal employee. That gave them jurisdiction. They have no jurisdiction in this case. The lawyers for the accusers know this, as do their allies in the Senate, yet they continue to suggest to the public there should be an FBI investigation.

That is nothing short of deliberately misleading the public for partisan purposes. The only ones we know for certain are lying here are the lawyers and congressmen calling for an FBI investigation, knowing that's not possible. They're just counting on the public not realizing this.

Charges could be filed in Maryland where these alleged crimes occurred, but they haven't been. If they really wanted an investigation, they'd file charges. All they want is the appearance of being denied an investigation, so they're not filing charges. The only explanation I can think of for that is because that false appearance of being denied an investigation is more politically beneficial than an actual investigation.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:34 AM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

I'm not a Democrat or a leftist. I know that your argument depends on simplistic categorizations, but please, if you want to discuss this with me, try to stick to the facts.

Hold up our public functions? LOL. You mean like Merrick Garland being "held up" for over 400 days for purely partisan reasons?

Come on, Burnsie.

We are either interested in discovering the facts or we aren't. Multiple women have accused Kavenaugh of sexual abuse. Are you really claiming that isn't a concern for a "life appointment"?

Surely you can see how that is dangerous ...
edit on 25-9-2018 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66




A quote, by a "classy, moral, ethical Republican woman" that suggests that high school boys normally rape little girls.

who was raped?
is that your own invention about this event?


I am still waiting for an answer to this as well.

Quite a bold claim to say a woman claimed it is normal for highschool boys to rape girls.

So surely with such a definitive statement, gryphon can show us who was raped that this republican woman was saying is normal.
edit on 25-9-2018 by Grambler because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   
I don't expect an answer to that.
When making up stories it gets hard to manage what the actual "facts" are.



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

What would you call forced intercourse with a 15-year old G?



posted on Sep, 25 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Grambler

What would you call forced intercourse with a 15-year old G?



I would call that rape.

Who is being accused of committing forced intercourse?




top topics



 
91
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join