It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Although it was already mentioned when when I said no one can make a judgment without all the evidence .
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: JasonBillung
Read the thread instead of hopping in on the tail end of it.
There is nothing illegal about suggesting removing a president because you dont think they are mentally fit, even if you work for him Now maybe the wearying a wire would be illegal, but no where near the crime of sedition.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: theantediluvian
I agree with you that what rosenstein did was within his rights regarding the 25th amendment.
Wouldnt it also apply that trump firing comey or rosenstein is also within his rights, and not a crime such as obstruction?
Trump was definitely operating within his authority as President to fire Comey. What's less clear is whether or not doing so with a corrupt intent is impeachable. I'm no expert obviously but given that impeachment is a political process and what constitutes "high crimes and misdemeanors" is not spelled out, I think it's ultimately up to Congress to make that determination.
Firing Rosenstein would also be within his authority as President of course and given the circumstances, I think it would be near impossible to successfully argue corrupt intent being behind the decision. That said, if Rosenstein's replacement immediately ends the Mueller investigation, there's going to be a political backlash.
I never said Rosenstein would be charged with sedation. I only showed proof that he could .
originally posted by: JasonBillung
a reply to: CrawlingChaos
My 16 year old son is not clinically insane, but he is also not fit to be president.
That is what the problem with the 25th conspiracy. It does not really detail what fit to serve means.
Ultimately it is up to Congress.
originally posted by: EchoesInTime
a reply to: Grambler
Reports are Noel Francisco will take over until the President names a replacement.
Any guesses on who Trump will appoint?
Noel Francisco: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: CriticalStinker
Their source was McCabe.
And
I never said Rosenstein would be charged with sedation. I only provided proof that he could .
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
originally posted by: JasonBillung
a reply to: CrawlingChaos
My 16 year old son is not clinically insane, but he is also not fit to be president.
That is what the problem with the 25th conspiracy. It does not really detail what fit to serve means.
Ultimately it is up to Congress.
The reason your son is unfit is because he's 16, and well below the minimum age requirement. 25'th amendment doesn't even play into the situation.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
Trump was definitely operating within his authority as President to fire Comey. What's less clear is whether or not doing so with a corrupt intent is impeachable. I'm no expert obviously but given that impeachment is a political process and what constitutes "high crimes and misdemeanors" is not spelled out, I think it's ultimately up to Congress to make that determination.
Sen. Harry Reid has called for FBI Director James Comey to resign ...
“I do not have confidence in him any longer,” Schumer — who is poised to be the Senate's top Democrat in 2017 — told Bloomberg on Wednesday
“The FBI director has no credibility,” said Rep. Maxine Waters of California.
“My confidence in the FBI director’s ability to lead this agency has been shaken,” said Rep. Hank Johnson of Georgia.
Congressman Steve Cohen (D-TN), November 2016, writing in the Hill:
For the sake of the FBI, Comey should resign
As a nearly ten-year veteran of the House Judiciary Committee — the committee responsible for oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Justice — and Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice, earlier this week I called on FBI Director James Comey to resign his position after his recent communication with members of Congress regarding the bureau’s review of emails potentially related to Hillary Clinton‘s personal email server
originally posted by: JasonBillung
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: CriticalStinker
Their source was McCabe.
And
I never said Rosenstein would be charged with sedation. I only provided proof that he could .
I don't think you know the legal definition. I provided it below. Notice the "by force" stuff?
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
source
I would assume that it was assumed with the writing of the 25th amendment that were it to be enforced, people in a presidents cabinet would be talking about getting people to push for it. How else would it ever be used.
There is nothing illegal about suggesting removing a president because you dont think they are mentally fit, even if you work for him Now maybe the wearying a wire would be illegal, but no where near the crime of sedition.
However, the important issue here is that rosenstein did not recuse himself from signing fisa warrants or appointing a special counselor, which is especially troubling given I think you a right when you say
And neither does any sane reasonable person.
Which means IF the story is true, and rosenstein did try to get people to invoke the 25th and wear a wire, he is especially needed to recuse himself from investigations into trump or his team.
He didnt do that, and now the entire appointment of Mueller should rightfully be questioned.
originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: CriticalStinker
I alleged nothing. I gave everyone circumstances that could cause him to be charged .
two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
originally posted by: JasonBillung
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
originally posted by: JasonBillung
a reply to: CrawlingChaos
My 16 year old son is not clinically insane, but he is also not fit to be president.
That is what the problem with the 25th conspiracy. It does not really detail what fit to serve means.
Ultimately it is up to Congress.
The reason your son is unfit is because he's 16, and well below the minimum age requirement. 25'th amendment doesn't even play into the situation.
I was going to throw that in there, but I felt that no one would be so petty to bring it up. Even if he was 35, in his current mind-set he would still be unfit.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Grambler
I agree with this to a point. However, if he recuses himself now or quits/is fired, it's important to define what "rightfully be questioned" means. I don't think there's a mechanism for retroactively nullifying the appointment so it falls down to whoever takes over for Rosenstein to question the appointment and whether the investigation should be ended.
In either case, it would be up to Mueller's new boss to decide whether to end it, let it continue or I suppose, even appoint a new SC to replace Mueller.
Whatever his decision, there would be political backlash.