Another woman brings sexual allegation against Kavanaugh

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

You can thank your God Obama for the Executive orders put in place that give Trump the powers he has. It'll come back to bite the Dems, just like the lynching of Kavanaugh can be repeated when the Dems get a president in power. Welcome to karma Democrats!

This "lynching" is payback for the way the GOP screwed Merrick Garland. Welcome to karma фашисты!

And another so called leftist cheering for weoponizing and trivializing sex assault allegations as payback


Wow you people disgust me

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

You can thank your God Obama for the Executive orders put in place that give Trump the powers he has. It'll come back to bite the Dems, just like the lynching of Kavanaugh can be repeated when the Dems get a president in power. Welcome to karma Democrats!

This "lynching" is payback for the way the GOP screwed Merrick Garland. Welcome to karma фашисты!

At least you admit what you are, but honestly, that's absolutely vile.

originally posted by: vor78

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

You can thank your God Obama for the Executive orders put in place that give Trump the powers he has. It'll come back to bite the Dems, just like the lynching of Kavanaugh can be repeated when the Dems get a president in power. Welcome to karma Democrats!

This "lynching" is payback for the way the GOP screwed Merrick Garland. Welcome to karma фашисты!

At least you admit what you are, but honestly, that's absolutely vile.

What did I admit? I simply observed that the Democrats are playing the same dirty game as the Republicans. The irony is that Kavanaugh was part of the Clinton sex "investigation." What goes around comes around.

a reply to: DJW001

You seem quite pleased with the Dems behavior here.

If the Dems want to use parliamentary tactics to delay or deny Kavanaugh a vote as the GOP did with Merrick Garland, that's one thing. Fair game, IMO. Its entirely another to engage in a personal smear campaign and attempt to ruin a man's career and destroy his family. There is no equivalence here.

a reply to: vor78

You seem quite pleased with the Dems behavior here.

I am pleased that Kavanaugh is being exposed for the corrupt fraud he is.

If the Dems want to use parliamentary tactics to delay or deny Kavanaugh a vote as the GOP did with Merrick Garland, that's one thing. Fair game, IMO. Its entirely another to engage in a personal smear campaign and attempt to ruin a man's career and destroy his family. There is no equivalence here.

Like Kavanaugh tried to do to Bill Clinton? Spare me the self righteous outrage. Bart O'Kavanaugh was a drunken incel who wrote obscene things about innocent girls in his high school yearbook. His roommate at Yale has exposed him as an angry drunk, and classmates at Yale are testifying about his bad behavior. Kavanaugh ruined his own life, and by accepting a Supreme Court appointment from our mentally challenged and politically toxic president ruined his family. The Democrats play dirty, he knew that going in. I am not approving playing dirty, simply pointing out that only an idiot would believe that they would play fair with so much on the line.

a reply to: DJW001

Once you start talking about payback and karma, it sure sounds like you approve of it. But if you say not, ok.

And I'll agree with you on that last point. I certainly didn't expect the Dems to play 'fair'. They never have and ironically, I think its going to cost them this battle in the end.

originally posted by: ipsedixit
This would appear to authenticate the Ramirez complaint against Kavanaugh. Yale alumni were emailing one another about the story long before the Kavanaugh confirmation process started.

www.businessinsider.com...

New Yorker reporter Jane Mayer said Monday she and fellow story author Ronan Farrow discovered Ramirez's story in a series of emails among Yale alumni in July, months before Kavanaugh's confirmation process.

"The story broke overnight, but it dates back 35 years," Mayer told NBC News' Savannah Guthrie. "The classmates at Yale were talking to each other about it, they were emailing about it. We've seen the emails, back in July before Christine Blasey Ford came forward, and eventually word of it spread. It spread to the Senate. It spread to the media. And we reached out to her."

I have a feeling that Kavanaugh was such a serial abuser of women that the trickle of complaints about him is going to turn into a flood. The Republicans will always support a perv, so they will try to get him confirmed ASAP, before he is caught in the deluge.


Kavanaugh could be facing another accuser before long. Coming forward in these situations is a big decision since it will involve a considerable amount of disruption to one's life.

www.vox.com...

Investigators in Montgomery County have apparently spoken with either a woman or her attorney about allegations of sexual assault against Kavanaugh that date back to his senior year of high school.

Investigators have apparently spoken to multiple witnesses about the allegations.

A formal complaint has not been filed.

“Without a complaint, they cannot conduct a further investigation,” said Karem. “That’s the fulcrum.”

In Maryland, there is no statute of limitations for rape and attempted rape.

The county police and the Montgomery County prosecuting attorney’s office have said they would conduct an investigation into the case, if a complaint is filed.

emailing, you say.

can we see those emails?

Sorry, I didn't realize this was an alt-right only echo chamber. Ciao and 88 baby.

Here is some detail from the accusations of Avenatti's client, Julie Swetnick. The Post says it has not verified the allegations. I'm not sure what they mean by that, or how they would do such a thing.

www.washingtonpost.com... 24aea-c190-11e8-97a5-ab1e46bb3bc7_story.html?utm_term=.36bf3d33f014

Swetnick said she witnessed efforts by Kavanaugh and others to get girls inebriated so they could be “gang raped” in side rooms at house parties by a “train” of numerous boys.

“I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their ‘turn’ with a girl inside the room. These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.”

She says she was raped at one of the parties but doesn't know if Kavanaugh was one of the rapists.

“During the incident, I was incapacitated without my consent and unable to fight off the boys raping me,” Swetnick says. “I believe I was drugged using Quaaludes or something similar placed in what I was drinking.”

a reply to: vor78

You seem to be okay with a potential Supreme Court judge doing things that put Cosby in jail. This isn't weaponized #metoo stuff, this is pure bad behavior. I guess pulling a train on people you incapacitated is okay if you have a 'R' by your name.

I came across this in the comment section of Oklahoma's fox23 news report. boards.4chan.org... it seems 4 chan has struck again.

a reply to: DJW001
Your little banner is ironic, since all I've seen you do for the last several posts is insult people, spout regurgitated rhetoric, or flat out use fallacies like you think we're dumb.

If there is no sperm, then you MUST confirm!

a reply to: mzinga

No, I'm not OK with that. If he's guilty, he should be prosecuted.

At the same time, I believe in the concept of innocent until proven guilty, and so far, I'm not convinced by the evidence presented by his accusers.

originally posted by: Warheadzonforeheadz
a reply to: DJW001
Your little banner is ironic, since all I've seen you do for the last several posts is insult people, spout regurgitated rhetoric, or flat out use fallacies like you think we're dumb.

You realize that everyone can read my posts and your posts judge for themselves who is more reasonable.

a reply to: DJW001

Oh trust me, you're not well liked by anyone, nor have you been deemed reasonable.

This CANNOT be allowed to succeed.
This is Thomas / Hill all over again. It is the Salem witch trials writ large.
These IDIOT republicans consistently allow democrats to out maneuver them because they constantly underestimate the depths of depravity that democrats are willing to go to achieve their Socialist utopia.

The TRUTH does not mean anything to democratic politicians. Remaining in and growing their political power is the single and only goal. People do not understand the razor edge that we are walking right now. This is far bigger than a nomination for the SC. This is legitimizing a tactic that will be rolled out time and time again to derail candidates that democrats feel pose a significant risk to their agenda. They tried to do this against Trump, but no one cared because we all knew Trump was a womanizer going into the deal. Then they rolled it out against some candidates that were not very well liked to begin with and political insiders were willing to cut lose and allow to be taken down. Now this is the main stage. This candidate is public enemy number one, more because he is a Trump nominee but also because he is a risk to Roe v Wade. If this succeeds then its all over and democrats have effectively gutted these gutless scum bag republicans.
Now what people are not appreciating is what that translates to.
If conservative, traditional Americans do not have a voice or politicians that can effectively represent them, then they have very few non-violent options left. This is prelude to civil war.

originally posted by: jedi_hamster

originally posted by: ipsedixit
This would appear to authenticate the Ramirez complaint against Kavanaugh. Yale alumni were emailing one another about the story long before the Kavanaugh confirmation process started.

www.businessinsider.com...

New Yorker reporter Jane Mayer said Monday she and fellow story author Ronan Farrow discovered Ramirez's story in a series of emails among Yale alumni in July, months before Kavanaugh's confirmation process.

"The story broke overnight, but it dates back 35 years," Mayer told NBC News' Savannah Guthrie. "The classmates at Yale were talking to each other about it, they were emailing about it. We've seen the emails, back in July before Christine Blasey Ford came forward, and eventually word of it spread. It spread to the Senate. It spread to the media. And we reached out to her."

I have a feeling that Kavanaugh was such a serial abuser of women that the trickle of complaints about him is going to turn into a flood. The Republicans will always support a perv, so they will try to get him confirmed ASAP, before he is caught in the deluge.


Kavanaugh could be facing another accuser before long. Coming forward in these situations is a big decision since it will involve a considerable amount of disruption to one's life.

www.vox.com...

Investigators in Montgomery County have apparently spoken with either a woman or her attorney about allegations of sexual assault against Kavanaugh that date back to his senior year of high school.

Investigators have apparently spoken to multiple witnesses about the allegations.

A formal complaint has not been filed.

“Without a complaint, they cannot conduct a further investigation,” said Karem. “That’s the fulcrum.”

In Maryland, there is no statute of limitations for rape and attempted rape.

The county police and the Montgomery County prosecuting attorney’s office have said they would conduct an investigation into the case, if a complaint is filed.

emailing, you say.

can we see those emails?

"The story broke overnight, but it dates back 35 years," Mayer told NBC News' Savannah Guthrie. "The classmates at Yale were talking to each other about it, they were emailing about it. We've seen the emails, back in July before Christine Blasey Ford came forward, and eventually word of it spread. It spread to the Senate. It spread to the media. And we reached out to her."

According to the lawyer it reached the Senate and media before they reached out to her. We can prove that is false because no one knew anything about it and no one in the Senate said anything about it.