It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Let's talk about the letter from Blasey Ford

page: 2
21
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 10:34 AM
link   
Trump should fire Rosenstein/Mueller to take the attention of this "public opinion court" away from Kav. We can sneak him through during the chaos, ensuring Trump is protected by SCOTUS/remaining federal government/national military/citizen militia/etc

Either way, we end up winning. And a little birdie says if Kav isn't confirmed, there is a far more conservative SCOTUS justice (who will overturn Roe immediately) waiting in the wings. I almost would like to see who it is...

Fortunately those dirty Dems only have power to open their big mouths and nothing more. They have no real power in government. They are not a governing party. Just their mouths, and their big-mouth sycophants dressed in black masks/terrorist rags. As long as none of these low information bleeding heart GOP sellouts side with the dirty 'crats, we are in business. Even so, many Red state Dems simply cannot afford to vote "no" for any reason.

NSA bulk intercepts of Ford/Feinstein/etc's phone calls/emails/private conversations should also be mysteriously leaked (if there is anything beneficial/incriminating there) by pro-Trump insiders. 2 can play at this "DEEPSTATE" game
edit on 9/23/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 10:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: StoutBroux

originally posted by: ganjoa
What about the alleged letter she wrote similarly implicating Neil Gorsuch when his confirmation came about?
If that letter could be found, it seems to me Ms. Ford's credibility - and her continued sanity - is at question.
I think she's just an attention seeking democrat/social justice warrior that's desperate to sacrifice for the cause.
OR a seditionist with a plan to disrupt all supreme court nominees not fitting her political profile....

ganjoa


I think this is a false claim. I wish we could stick to facts and let the cesspool of falsehood fake news exude their poisonous lies while those who care about the truth only spread the truth.

After searching and searching, I find no such claim to be valid. Here is what I found:

This claim seems to have originated with a Twitter user, Josh Cornett, who appears to have a history of amplifying right-wing misinformation. (The user’s account has tweeted messages of support for QAnon, a sprawling pro-Trump conspiracy theory.)

On Tuesday, Cornett, referring to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., tweeted: “According to sources Diane [sic] Feinstein’s reluctance to mention the Kavanaugh accuser’s letter during confirmation session is because the accuser sent a similiar [sic] letter directed at Judge Gorsuch last year.” In a follow-up tweet, he said he had “no idea” if the information was true, but that “my source has been very accurate in the past.”

There is no known letter sent by Blasey about Gorsuch, or any other Supreme Court justice. Still, the tweet got more than 7,000 retweets.

www.seattletimes.com...


If anyone has ANY proof of such a letter or valid accusations at the time of such a letter, bring it on. But we should deny ignorance, on both sides of the aisle.


At this point, it does appear Ford is a bit mixed up in her accusation 'facts' for whatever reasons, and her credibility is fading fast. I for one am tired of this distraction and can't wait for it to be over. I'm so tired of the lies.


Gorsuch went to the same school as Kavanaugh...and is only a couple of years older.
It's quite possible Ford tried the same scam with Gorsuch.


So where's the proof? If she had written a letter alleging crimes against Gorsuch, I guarantee you we would have seen the same circus and what is happening now would be a rerun.

I'm not saying she did or didn't accuse Gorsuch but I am saying where's the proof? If all here are clamoring against Ford's claims backing up the fact she has no proof, then don't be hypocrites. Stating "it's quite possible" is just more bull, more lack of facts. Don't be hypocrites. Demand from yourselves hat your are demanding from Ford and her assembly of groupies.


Just sayin.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 10:41 AM
link   
a reply to: StoutBroux

The problem is, the letter is redacted. Politicians are dishonest.

2 undisputable facts.


So it leads to speculation. And to rule out of hand any speculation is just as dishonest as the politicians themselves.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 10:41 AM
link   
a reply to: StoutBroux

Sadly playing by the rules is what got us here to begin with.

We need to operate under the letter of the law not by some unwritten rule book, which says this: Ford is an accuser. Therefore Ford is burdened with providing evidence affirmatively proving her accusation. Accuser Ford must entirely prove her case, while accused Kavanaugh is not required to defend himself (although he may). Unless Ford has video/photographic evidence or a confession from Kavanaugh, there is no evidence and this is all a distraction/massive waste of time.

Her word is meaningless. Anyone can say anything. Kavanaugh denied the accusation, so it is he said/she said... nothing more. Ford is actually less credible than Kavanaugh, by far, but that is wholly irrelevant. She has no evidence to back her accusations up and that is why they shouldn't be believed. And until she does, it should be assumed her allegations are just that...mere accusations.

On the other hand, I heard a rumor that real American women would be coming forward by the dozens for every single Dem candidate/nominee from now on. Why not? If it can disrupt or even derail official public business, how is this ANY different than "paper terrorism." It isn't.

edit on 9/23/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 10:49 AM
link   
CC.

edit on 23-9-2018 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 10:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's possible. Maybe they had it planned for Gorsuch, but the evidence was so flimsy they dropped it. Now they are even more desperate, and decided to go through with it this time.
THIS is what the FBI need to investigate.


ADD this thought:
IF, indeed, Ford first tried the exact same scam on Gorsuch...Gorsuch would've been 19-20...SHE would've been 15.

Gorsuch would've been made out to be a Pedo.


How do you figure that? Gorsuch graduated high school the same year as Ford did in 1985!

Edit add: Gorsuch born in 1966 and Ford was born in 1967. No pedo application there but would have made more sense of her partying with someone in her own grade level and age group.
edit on 9 23 2018 by CynConcepts because: (no reason given)

edit on 9 23 2018 by CynConcepts because: (no reason given)


Perhaps, this is why none of her witnesses can remember Kavanaugh and her ever being at a party together. Wonder if it was actually with Gorsuch. Hmmm?
edit on 9 23 2018 by CynConcepts because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 10:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: StoutBroux

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: StoutBroux

originally posted by: ganjoa
What about the alleged letter she wrote similarly implicating Neil Gorsuch when his confirmation came about?
If that letter could be found, it seems to me Ms. Ford's credibility - and her continued sanity - is at question.
I think she's just an attention seeking democrat/social justice warrior that's desperate to sacrifice for the cause.
OR a seditionist with a plan to disrupt all supreme court nominees not fitting her political profile....

ganjoa


I think this is a false claim. I wish we could stick to facts and let the cesspool of falsehood fake news exude their poisonous lies while those who care about the truth only spread the truth.

After searching and searching, I find no such claim to be valid. Here is what I found:

This claim seems to have originated with a Twitter user, Josh Cornett, who appears to have a history of amplifying right-wing misinformation. (The user’s account has tweeted messages of support for QAnon, a sprawling pro-Trump conspiracy theory.)

On Tuesday, Cornett, referring to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., tweeted: “According to sources Diane [sic] Feinstein’s reluctance to mention the Kavanaugh accuser’s letter during confirmation session is because the accuser sent a similiar [sic] letter directed at Judge Gorsuch last year.” In a follow-up tweet, he said he had “no idea” if the information was true, but that “my source has been very accurate in the past.”

There is no known letter sent by Blasey about Gorsuch, or any other Supreme Court justice. Still, the tweet got more than 7,000 retweets.

www.seattletimes.com...


If anyone has ANY proof of such a letter or valid accusations at the time of such a letter, bring it on. But we should deny ignorance, on both sides of the aisle.


At this point, it does appear Ford is a bit mixed up in her accusation 'facts' for whatever reasons, and her credibility is fading fast. I for one am tired of this distraction and can't wait for it to be over. I'm so tired of the lies.


Gorsuch went to the same school as Kavanaugh...and is only a couple of years older.
It's quite possible Ford tried the same scam with Gorsuch.


So where's the proof? If she had written a letter alleging crimes against Gorsuch, I guarantee you we would have seen the same circus and what is happening now would be a rerun.

I'm not saying she did or didn't accuse Gorsuch but I am saying where's the proof? If all here are clamoring against Ford's claims backing up the fact she has no proof, then don't be hypocrites. Stating "it's quite possible" is just more bull, more lack of facts. Don't be hypocrites. Demand from yourselves hat your are demanding from Ford and her assembly of groupies.


Just sayin.


PROOF?...Who requires PROOF for convicting someone in the court of public opinion?
I thought we're now following Ford and the Left's lead, here.

Goose/Gander...IT'S ALL GOOD!



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 11:00 AM
link   


Ford claims debunked



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 11:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's possible. Maybe they had it planned for Gorsuch, but the evidence was so flimsy they dropped it. Now they are even more desperate, and decided to go through with it this time.
THIS is what the FBI need to investigate.


ADD this thought:
IF, indeed, Ford first tried the exact same scam on Gorsuch...Gorsuch would've been 19-20...SHE would've been 15.

Gorsuch would've been made out to be a Pedo.


How do you figure that? Gorsuch graduated high school the same year as Ford did in 1985!

Edit add: Gorsuch born in 1966 and Ford was born in 1967. No pedo application there but would have made more sense of her partying with someone in her own grade level and age group.

Perhaps, this is why none of her witnesses can remember Kavanaugh and her ever being at a party together. Wonder if it was actually with Gorsuch. Hmmm?


You are correct.
Got their Bday's backwards. Gorsuch and Ford would've been same age.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 11:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: CynConcepts

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's possible. Maybe they had it planned for Gorsuch, but the evidence was so flimsy they dropped it. Now they are even more desperate, and decided to go through with it this time.
THIS is what the FBI need to investigate.


ADD this thought:
IF, indeed, Ford first tried the exact same scam on Gorsuch...Gorsuch would've been 19-20...SHE would've been 15.

Gorsuch would've been made out to be a Pedo.




Perhaps, this is why none of her witnesses can remember Kavanaugh and her ever being at a party together. Wonder if it was actually with Gorsuch. Hmmm?


Good point.
The Left should probably just go ahead and impeach Gorsuch too...It's the only way to be sure.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 11:27 AM
link   
So this "Dr Ford" has a PhD and other degrees, and writes a letter that resembles a 9th grader.

Read the letter Christine Blasey Ford sent accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct

👆👆 "released" by CNN of course. READ very carefully and notice some oddities like maybe a lawyer wrote it with advice from a PR/consulting outfit (it appeals deeply to die-hard Democrats).

I bet this was conspired from day1 between Feinstein, the Congressperson, and the lawyer(s) involved.

Ford is either a raving mental case, or part of the Democrat operation.

💥😃💥



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: StoutBroux

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: StoutBroux

originally posted by: ganjoa
What about the alleged letter she wrote similarly implicating Neil Gorsuch when his confirmation came about?
If that letter could be found, it seems to me Ms. Ford's credibility - and her continued sanity - is at question.
I think she's just an attention seeking democrat/social justice warrior that's desperate to sacrifice for the cause.
OR a seditionist with a plan to disrupt all supreme court nominees not fitting her political profile....

ganjoa


I think this is a false claim. I wish we could stick to facts and let the cesspool of falsehood fake news exude their poisonous lies while those who care about the truth only spread the truth.

After searching and searching, I find no such claim to be valid. Here is what I found:

This claim seems to have originated with a Twitter user, Josh Cornett, who appears to have a history of amplifying right-wing misinformation. (The user’s account has tweeted messages of support for QAnon, a sprawling pro-Trump conspiracy theory.)

On Tuesday, Cornett, referring to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., tweeted: “According to sources Diane [sic] Feinstein’s reluctance to mention the Kavanaugh accuser’s letter during confirmation session is because the accuser sent a similiar [sic] letter directed at Judge Gorsuch last year.” In a follow-up tweet, he said he had “no idea” if the information was true, but that “my source has been very accurate in the past.”

There is no known letter sent by Blasey about Gorsuch, or any other Supreme Court justice. Still, the tweet got more than 7,000 retweets.

www.seattletimes.com...


If anyone has ANY proof of such a letter or valid accusations at the time of such a letter, bring it on. But we should deny ignorance, on both sides of the aisle.


At this point, it does appear Ford is a bit mixed up in her accusation 'facts' for whatever reasons, and her credibility is fading fast. I for one am tired of this distraction and can't wait for it to be over. I'm so tired of the lies.


Gorsuch went to the same school as Kavanaugh...and is only a couple of years older.
It's quite possible Ford tried the same scam with Gorsuch.


So where's the proof? If she had written a letter alleging crimes against Gorsuch, I guarantee you we would have seen the same circus and what is happening now would be a rerun.

I'm not saying she did or didn't accuse Gorsuch but I am saying where's the proof? If all here are clamoring against Ford's claims backing up the fact she has no proof, then don't be hypocrites. Stating "it's quite possible" is just more bull, more lack of facts. Don't be hypocrites. Demand from yourselves hat your are demanding from Ford and her assembly of groupies.


Just sayin.


Nope. Accusing people without evidence is all the rage right now #metoo!!!

That said....Ford sent a letter alledging the same things as she did against Kav. I don't need proof. I dont need to provide a time, place or even the letter itself. I heard it from someone and that's all the proof that's needed these days.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   
[
edit on 23-9-2018 by Malcador because: Triple post



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   

edit on 23-9-2018 by Malcador because: Triple post



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   
Not sure why my phone keeps doing this. I hit submit one time and it posted what, 6 times?

Not doing this on purpose peeps and it's as annoying to me as it is to you lol.

Grrrrrr!
edit on 23-9-2018 by Malcador because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   

edit on 23-9-2018 by Malcador because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   

edit on 23-9-2018 by Malcador because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   

edit on 23-9-2018 by Malcador because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   

edit on 23-9-2018 by Malcador because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   

edit on 23-9-2018 by Malcador because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join