It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

All three witnesses Kavanaugh accuser claims were at party deny her account

page: 5
69
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 11:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Since when did we become a country where someone is guilty until proven innocent?
That is a very scary precedent to set.




posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 12:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Grambler

Since when did we become a country where someone is guilty until proven innocent?
That is a very scary precedent to set.



Since we had a congress that ignored the 5th Amendment.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 12:07 AM
link   
Interesting that none of the usual Leftist posters have made an appearance in this thread isn't it?

Awfully quiet in here......not a Reeeeeee! to be found.





posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 12:28 AM
link   
Judge Judy would throw this lady and her case out of her courtroom in less than 10 minutes.

This is a sh*tshow if I’ve ever seen one.

#JudgeJudyKnowsBest



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 12:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Grambler

Since when did we become a country where someone is guilty until proven innocent?
That is a very scary precedent to set.



Well in Ford’s defense, she is a woman and Kavanaugh is an old white republican male, so in this day and age of backwards thinking, #MeToo, identity politics, delusional leftists and corruption all throughout the government— a delusional leftist backwards thinking woman is not only able to take down a judicial nomination by nothing but an accusation, everyone in our country but those with working minds encourage her to do so.

Since then, to answer your question




posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 12:48 AM
link   
Another interesting story is coming down the pipe.

Joe diGenova: 'All Over the Country, PGA Golf Tour Members Are Talking About Christine Blasey Ford'


“This is a joke. She is absolutely unreliable as a witness. And tonight, all over the country, PGA Tour members are talking about her," diGenova told Fox News' Laura Ingraham Thursday night.

“I can only tell you this. There is more news coming out every day about Dr. Ford,” he said later in the show. "The Washington Post is doing a biography on her right now, and in the course of doing so -- they contacted, at her request, members of the PGA Tour -- one of whom told the Post, 'I don't think you really want to talk to me.'"

Toward the end of the show, diGenova said, “I’m for calling in outside witnesses. I want all the PGA golfers who have anything to say about her brought in to testify.”

Nonplussed, Ingraham asked, “OK, go go to her character?” He repeated, “Bring in the PGA golfers to testify about her. She has put her character at issue. Bring in those golfers!”

Laughing, Ingraham said, "Everyone’s wondering, googling LPGA, is it LPGA or PGA?”

DiGenova replied, “It’s PGA. It’s the men. Bring in the golfers!”

Why would they be talking about her?

Power elite of suburban Washington split over Kavanaugh allegations

Ford’s father, Ralph Blasey, was president of the all-male Burning Tree Golf Club in Bethesda

Is that the infamous "19th hole" golf club? I wonder what they're really talking about.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 12:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler


So everyone ford says was at the party deny her account


I have no idea if this woman is making this whole thing up or not, however, this is a factually incorrect statement.

Keyer - says she doesn't know Kavanaugh and "has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present"

Smyth - "I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh."

Judge - "I have no memory of this alleged incident" "Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Dr. Ford's letter"

None of them actually deny her account. All of them say they do not recall. I don't recall every individual party I went to in high school nor every time a small group of friends hung out somewhere. I don't think I was particularly extroverted and I would guess times I was hanging out/partying with 4+ people in high school would number a couple hundred. And nearly all of them involved intoxicants. And I went to high school a decade after these people.

Hell, I'd be hard pressed to remember two dozen people from high school but apparently it was no trouble to get 65 female character witnesses from neighboring schools in 24 hours for Kavanaugh. So maybe I should have laid off those intoxicants.

I can remember particular incidents that were significant for some reason or another though I'd be hard pressed to tell you what season they all occurred in let alone the date. To be fair though, I do think I'd recall all the locations. That's one of the weakest parts of the allegation to me based just on what I've read. That gives me some pause.

At the end of the day, it's all but certain that Kavanaugh is going to get confirmed on a vote along party lines. Hard to believe there's any other way it goes and it really doesn't matter if it happened or not. It basically comes down to her account vs Kavanaugh and Judge and really just Kavanaugh because Judge isn't going to appear. The absolute only way he isn't confirmed is if Ford's testimony is unbelievably compelling. We're talking wracked by sobs type stuff here. And let's face it, some people are naturally adept at faking emotions. Some people are excellent liars. So even if she is super believable, people are really good at not believing when they have a vested interest.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 01:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Socialist are the lowest form of human life,they never have anything going for them,looks brains,job,so character assasination becomes normal for them,it's there ignorant self centered nature



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 01:34 AM
link   

edit on 23-9-2018 by putnam6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 01:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Grambler


So everyone ford says was at the party deny her account


I have no idea if this woman is making this whole thing up or not, however, this is a factually incorrect statement.

Keyer - says she doesn't know Kavanaugh and "has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present"

Smyth - "I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh."

Judge - "I have no memory of this alleged incident" "Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Dr. Ford's letter"

None of them actually deny her account. All of them say they do not recall. I don't recall every individual party I went to in high school nor every time a small group of friends hung out somewhere. I don't think I was particularly extroverted and I would guess times I was hanging out/partying with 4+ people in high school would number a couple hundred. And nearly all of them involved intoxicants. And I went to high school a decade after these people.

Hell, I'd be hard pressed to remember two dozen people from high school but apparently it was no trouble to get 65 female character witnesses from neighboring schools in 24 hours for Kavanaugh. So maybe I should have laid off those intoxicants.

I can remember particular incidents that were significant for some reason or another though I'd be hard pressed to tell you what season they all occurred in let alone the date. To be fair though, I do think I'd recall all the locations. That's one of the weakest parts of the allegation to me based just on what I've read. That gives me some pause.

At the end of the day, it's all but certain that Kavanaugh is going to get confirmed on a vote along party lines. Hard to believe there's any other way it goes and it really doesn't matter if it happened or not. It basically comes down to her account vs Kavanaugh and Judge and really just Kavanaugh because Judge isn't going to appear. The absolute only way he isn't confirmed is if Ford's testimony is unbelievably compelling. We're talking wracked by sobs type stuff here. And let's face it, some people are naturally adept at faking emotions. Some people are excellent liars. So even if she is super believable, people are really good at not believing when they have a vested interest.


If you had bothered listening to anb of the 65 women that banded together to stand up for Kavanaugh you would have heard (from them) that lost of them know each other in some capacity and many of them have worked together or associated with one another over the years.

Your assertion that the were gathered is patently false. You either didnt know about it (which I find hard to believe) or you are deliberately lying.

If you had bothered to listen to them speak in their own words you would know that THEY took the initiative to stand up for Kav.

It wasn't a nefarious plot. It was 65 women that see this charade for what it is and stood up to prevent insanity.

Maybe head on over to YouTube and listen to these women instead of parroting leftist talking points. Or not, whatever.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 02:06 AM
link   
And yet the man is getting grilled by the likes of Cory Booker, a man that ADMITTED in his writings that he sexually assaulted someone, and the left are completely mum on the issue..........

Silence..........

Crickets.........

Dont tell me that there isnt a double standard and that this isnt a ploy to stop Kavenaugh, they have tried everything else in the book.

Wheres the integrity? Wheres the intellectual honesty? Why arent people calling for Bookers resignation???????



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 02:07 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian




I have no idea if this woman is making this whole thing up or not, however, this is a factually incorrect statement.

Keyer - says she doesn't know Kavanaugh and "has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present"

Smyth - "I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh."

Judge - "I have no memory of this alleged incident" "Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Dr. Ford's letter"

None of them actually deny her account. All of them say they do not recall. I don't recall every individual party I went to in high school nor every time a small group of friends hung out somewhere. I don't think I was particularly extroverted and I would guess times I was hanging out/partying with 4+ people in high school would number a couple hundred. And nearly all of them involved intoxicants. And I went to high school a decade after these people.



They admitted to not remembering that there ever being such a party--not even her childhood friend from the time. Hef friend even stated that she didn't know Kavanaugh. Thats speaks to more than just " oh, I don't remember".

Thinking this through, we'd have to believe that if such a party did occure, not only does no one else remember it, her friend claims not to have meet Kavanaugh, and Fords--by her story--ran out the house leaving her friend, alone, with two guys that just tried to rape her


Also considering that the letter to Feinstien and her notes from her therapist mention there only being 4 males and herself. It was only later after speaking with her attorney that there were three males and one female.

Add to that Ford being a political activists, a Democrat and hates Trump.

This whole thing lacks creditbility.

edit on 23-9-2018 by timequake because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 02:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Konduit


If proven true, that article would make for a FUN thread! (Associating Christine with balls, drivers, hole-in-one, etc..LOL)

Much like the threads featuring Anthony Weiner in 2015/2016.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 02:19 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian




I have no idea if this woman is making this whole thing up or not, however, this is a factually incorrect statement. Keyer - says she doesn't know Kavanaugh and "has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present" Smyth -
"I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh." Judge -

"I have no memory of this alleged incident" "Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Dr. Ford's letter"


Thats literally a denial from every single one........

Come on man , I use to have a LOT of respect for you, especially when you and others stood in the middle with me in the last election.

But it looks like youre starting to push a narrative over truth.

Its important we dont let political ideology get in the way of facts............

You know, with any intellectual integrity, that all of those are denials of the narrative this woman pushed.......period, they didnt back up her claims one iota.........



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 02:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: SR1TX
She and anyone else that took part in the smear campaign needs to go to prison.

It's not right to destroy someone like that and get away with it.


I agree. The damage it has done to real victims is unforgivable. # like this is why women aren't believed. There need to be charges.


Charges? I think the kinda charges she needs are the kind that cover the cost of time wasted on this. How much money has been thrown away that could've been spent doing other things... Like the legislators actually doing their jobs! Stall tactics. I tried that at work before... Then I had to find a new job. Any legal charges brought against her would cost taxpayers more money and probably only result in being found guilty for jaywalking into the courthouse and having to pay a $25 fine.

Also tied into having to pay for wasting time, I say that we begin charging the legislators for every 15 minutes they waste on things that don't allow them to do their jobs. Hold up the legislative process for an hour and you have to pay $25k or something like that. I'm sure an accountant could figure out what it costs to run the Senate for an hour.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 03:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: Nickn3
a reply to: Grambler
Ford has no more credibility than the FBI.

Actually kind of have to hand it to the FBI in this case, they heard the story and went



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 04:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

It was an undocumented "Spanish Fly"



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 04:37 AM
link   
a reply to: ausername

No, it's not. So long as Schumer and/or Feinstein, et al have a seat at the confirmation hearings, and the ability to swing votes, a travesty could still occur.

So, no, it's not over yet.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 04:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Absolutely. I wouldn't give her a choice now. She either testifies before the committee, or she face contempt of Congress charges.

Period.

Kavanaugh has the right to face his accusers. Anything less makes a mockery of an already far too politicized event.



posted on Sep, 23 2018 @ 07:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

it doesn't matter now. The damage is done and the intended outcome has already happened. Kavanaugh is a rapist and should just register as a sex offender now. And the next guy will have the same problems. Maybe even with the same woman. (she gets around)

Strike a match, hold it to the paper, and wait for the Media to blow some air on it.



new topics

top topics



 
69
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join