It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

All three witnesses Kavanaugh accuser claims were at party deny her account

page: 2
69
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:00 PM
link   
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist

Good point! Perhaps 45%-50% odds for her showing up Thursday is still too high.


edit on 9/22/2018 by carewemust because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

In written testimony sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee, a third named witness has rejected the allegations made by Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser. Having been asked by a Senate staffer to comment on the charges advanced against the nominee, a lawyer for Leland Ingham Keyser wrote:

Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.

Under 18 U.S.C § 1001, letters to the Judiciary Committee are subject to criminal penalty if false.

Ms. Keyer, whom CNN confirms is “a lifelong friend of Ford’s,” is the third named witness to deny any knowledge of the allegations. The other two, Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth, issued written statements to that effect earlier in the week. Thus far, nobody has backed up the account advanced by Kavanaugh’s accuser, while Kavanaugh and three other named witnesses have rejected it outright.


www.nationalreview.com...

So everyone ford says was at the party deny her account

This third lady is even a lifelong friend of fords, and she even says it didn’t happen

Yet we still see so many democrats saying they know know Kavanaugh is guilty

So she doesn’t remember the time or place, and all of the people she claimed were there say she is wrong

If she can’t provide any other evidence, what more is there to look at?



I would bet money that this lady was named in the original letter.

That is why Grassley has been pressing the vote.

Every person she has named has said "nope".



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: face23785

There must be something about Thursday. They insist that Thursday is better than Wednesday. Why?

Of course every day they can delay is better for them. What if they plan for something comes up at the last minute and she can not make it Thursday, so then it would get pushed off to next week. If it was scheduled for Wed. and she was delayed, they might have made her come Thursday.

I wonder if some of the Senators have vacation coming up? Maybe they are pushing it off so that the vote happens when certain key people are not available?



The Senate's procedural rules make it so that if they delay it til Thursday, the earliest they can actually hold the confirmation vote is like late Sunday night, as I recall. Then some other hiccup could delay it to the point where Kavanaugh wouldn't be seated for the next SCOTUS session. That's why they're so insistent on Thursday.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Grambler

In written testimony sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee, a third named witness has rejected the allegations made by Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser. Having been asked by a Senate staffer to comment on the charges advanced against the nominee, a lawyer for Leland Ingham Keyser wrote:

Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.

Under 18 U.S.C § 1001, letters to the Judiciary Committee are subject to criminal penalty if false.

Ms. Keyer, whom CNN confirms is “a lifelong friend of Ford’s,” is the third named witness to deny any knowledge of the allegations. The other two, Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth, issued written statements to that effect earlier in the week. Thus far, nobody has backed up the account advanced by Kavanaugh’s accuser, while Kavanaugh and three other named witnesses have rejected it outright.


www.nationalreview.com...

So everyone ford says was at the party deny her account

This third lady is even a lifelong friend of fords, and she even says it didn’t happen

Yet we still see so many democrats saying they know know Kavanaugh is guilty

So she doesn’t remember the time or place, and all of the people she claimed were there say she is wrong

If she can’t provide any other evidence, what more is there to look at?



I would bet money that this lady was named in the original letter.

That is why Grassley has been pressing the vote.

Every person she has named has said "nope".



This article is saying she was the third named witness

That means every single person she said was in the house are denying her claim



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Grambler

In written testimony sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee, a third named witness has rejected the allegations made by Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser. Having been asked by a Senate staffer to comment on the charges advanced against the nominee, a lawyer for Leland Ingham Keyser wrote:

Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.

Under 18 U.S.C § 1001, letters to the Judiciary Committee are subject to criminal penalty if false.

Ms. Keyer, whom CNN confirms is “a lifelong friend of Ford’s,” is the third named witness to deny any knowledge of the allegations. The other two, Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth, issued written statements to that effect earlier in the week. Thus far, nobody has backed up the account advanced by Kavanaugh’s accuser, while Kavanaugh and three other named witnesses have rejected it outright.


www.nationalreview.com...

So everyone ford says was at the party deny her account

This third lady is even a lifelong friend of fords, and she even says it didn’t happen

Yet we still see so many democrats saying they know know Kavanaugh is guilty

So she doesn’t remember the time or place, and all of the people she claimed were there say she is wrong

If she can’t provide any other evidence, what more is there to look at?



I would bet money that this lady was named in the original letter.

That is why Grassley has been pressing the vote.

Every person she has named has said "nope".



This article is saying she was the third named witness

That means every single person she said was in the house are denying her claim


I don't see any reason for a hearing now. It's obviously fake. Just hold the vote Monday.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: face23785

There must be something about Thursday. They insist that Thursday is better than Wednesday. Why?

Of course every day they can delay is better for them. What if they plan for something comes up at the last minute and she can not make it Thursday, so then it would get pushed off to next week. If it was scheduled for Wed. and she was delayed, they might have made her come Thursday.

I wonder if some of the Senators have vacation coming up? Maybe they are pushing it off so that the vote happens when certain key people are not available?



Not sure but it is EERILY reminiscent of the Thomas vote and hearing with almost the exact same timeline and issues...

www.nytimes.com...

And the chair then was Joe Biden....

Wondering if he has a puppet hand in this current charade as well....



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Grambler

In written testimony sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee, a third named witness has rejected the allegations made by Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser. Having been asked by a Senate staffer to comment on the charges advanced against the nominee, a lawyer for Leland Ingham Keyser wrote:

Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.

Under 18 U.S.C § 1001, letters to the Judiciary Committee are subject to criminal penalty if false.

Ms. Keyer, whom CNN confirms is “a lifelong friend of Ford’s,” is the third named witness to deny any knowledge of the allegations. The other two, Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth, issued written statements to that effect earlier in the week. Thus far, nobody has backed up the account advanced by Kavanaugh’s accuser, while Kavanaugh and three other named witnesses have rejected it outright.


www.nationalreview.com...

So everyone ford says was at the party deny her account

This third lady is even a lifelong friend of fords, and she even says it didn’t happen

Yet we still see so many democrats saying they know know Kavanaugh is guilty

So she doesn’t remember the time or place, and all of the people she claimed were there say she is wrong

If she can’t provide any other evidence, what more is there to look at?



I would bet money that this lady was named in the original letter.

That is why Grassley has been pressing the vote.

Every person she has named has said "nope".



This article is saying she was the third named witness

That means every single person she said was in the house are denying her claim


And everyone she said was there also didnt live in the area she claimed the home was.

Either she is lying or she is misidentify the person. Problem is after 35 years i can see why confusion would sit in. For me high school was 25 years ago and even i was attempting to recall details of a party. So as an experiment i called 3 friends from high school we all remembered the party very differently.

About the only thing we agreed on was the police showing up.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

That's no reason not to believe her.


edit on 22-9-2018 by Aallanon because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Feinstein sat on it for two months because she knew it was thin then. They likely had all kinds of dirt diggers looking for more to go with this one letter.

Now that they need to stall, this is what they have, so they ran with it.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Grambler

In written testimony sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee, a third named witness has rejected the allegations made by Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser. Having been asked by a Senate staffer to comment on the charges advanced against the nominee, a lawyer for Leland Ingham Keyser wrote:

Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.

Under 18 U.S.C § 1001, letters to the Judiciary Committee are subject to criminal penalty if false.

Ms. Keyer, whom CNN confirms is “a lifelong friend of Ford’s,” is the third named witness to deny any knowledge of the allegations. The other two, Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth, issued written statements to that effect earlier in the week. Thus far, nobody has backed up the account advanced by Kavanaugh’s accuser, while Kavanaugh and three other named witnesses have rejected it outright.


www.nationalreview.com...

So everyone ford says was at the party deny her account

This third lady is even a lifelong friend of fords, and she even says it didn’t happen

Yet we still see so many democrats saying they know know Kavanaugh is guilty

So she doesn’t remember the time or place, and all of the people she claimed were there say she is wrong

If she can’t provide any other evidence, what more is there to look at?



I would bet money that this lady was named in the original letter.

That is why Grassley has been pressing the vote.

Every person she has named has said "nope".



This article is saying she was the third named witness

That means every single person she said was in the house are denying her claim


I don't see any reason for a hearing now. It's obviously fake. Just hold the vote Monday.


Just to be clear, it is still possible she could be telling the truth, but all three witnesses just don’t remember, albeit unlikely

However, if she can’t remember where and when it happened, and has no more evidence I don’t know what she could say that would make a reasonable person decide he is guilty

I still think she should testify

No more delays though

If she delays again hold the vote immediately

And after the vote, there should be an investigation into her claims and the democrats that held them for months to see if this was an intentional smear job
edit on 22-9-2018 by Grambler because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Grambler

In written testimony sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee, a third named witness has rejected the allegations made by Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser. Having been asked by a Senate staffer to comment on the charges advanced against the nominee, a lawyer for Leland Ingham Keyser wrote:

Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.

Under 18 U.S.C § 1001, letters to the Judiciary Committee are subject to criminal penalty if false.

Ms. Keyer, whom CNN confirms is “a lifelong friend of Ford’s,” is the third named witness to deny any knowledge of the allegations. The other two, Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth, issued written statements to that effect earlier in the week. Thus far, nobody has backed up the account advanced by Kavanaugh’s accuser, while Kavanaugh and three other named witnesses have rejected it outright.


www.nationalreview.com...

So everyone ford says was at the party deny her account

This third lady is even a lifelong friend of fords, and she even says it didn’t happen

Yet we still see so many democrats saying they know know Kavanaugh is guilty

So she doesn’t remember the time or place, and all of the people she claimed were there say she is wrong

If she can’t provide any other evidence, what more is there to look at?



I would bet money that this lady was named in the original letter.

That is why Grassley has been pressing the vote.

Every person she has named has said "nope".



This article is saying she was the third named witness

That means every single person she said was in the house are denying her claim


What really gets me is that all MSM, until this very night, has been saying it was all boys. Except for that one interview that has gotten no coverage where Fords attorney says there was a second girl there.

This had to have been in the original letter. That is the only way the attorney and the investigators could have known the name this quickly.

The issue now is how did the investigators get the name since Feinstein hasn't given them the letter.

Wondering if the FBI actually already DID have this info and had already found it false.

That would explain the confidence of Kavanaugh and the GOP that they could just push ahead.

Any way it works out, Ford is about to be buried in a world of $hit....



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Grambler

In written testimony sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee, a third named witness has rejected the allegations made by Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser. Having been asked by a Senate staffer to comment on the charges advanced against the nominee, a lawyer for Leland Ingham Keyser wrote:

Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.

Under 18 U.S.C § 1001, letters to the Judiciary Committee are subject to criminal penalty if false.

Ms. Keyer, whom CNN confirms is “a lifelong friend of Ford’s,” is the third named witness to deny any knowledge of the allegations. The other two, Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth, issued written statements to that effect earlier in the week. Thus far, nobody has backed up the account advanced by Kavanaugh’s accuser, while Kavanaugh and three other named witnesses have rejected it outright.


www.nationalreview.com...

So everyone ford says was at the party deny her account

This third lady is even a lifelong friend of fords, and she even says it didn’t happen

Yet we still see so many democrats saying they know know Kavanaugh is guilty

So she doesn’t remember the time or place, and all of the people she claimed were there say she is wrong

If she can’t provide any other evidence, what more is there to look at?



I would bet money that this lady was named in the original letter.

That is why Grassley has been pressing the vote.

Every person she has named has said "nope".



This article is saying she was the third named witness

That means every single person she said was in the house are denying her claim


And everyone she said was there also didnt live in the area she claimed the home was.

Either she is lying or she is misidentify the person. Problem is after 35 years i can see why confusion would sit in. For me high school was 25 years ago and even i was attempting to recall details of a party. So as an experiment i called 3 friends from high school we all remembered the party very differently.

About the only thing we agreed on was the police showing up.


But you all remembered being there and knew the others were there....

Fords "witnesses" say they weren't even there and one doesnt even know Kavanaugh....



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Grambler

In written testimony sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee, a third named witness has rejected the allegations made by Judge Kavanaugh’s accuser. Having been asked by a Senate staffer to comment on the charges advanced against the nominee, a lawyer for Leland Ingham Keyser wrote:

Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.

Under 18 U.S.C § 1001, letters to the Judiciary Committee are subject to criminal penalty if false.

Ms. Keyer, whom CNN confirms is “a lifelong friend of Ford’s,” is the third named witness to deny any knowledge of the allegations. The other two, Mark Judge and Patrick Smyth, issued written statements to that effect earlier in the week. Thus far, nobody has backed up the account advanced by Kavanaugh’s accuser, while Kavanaugh and three other named witnesses have rejected it outright.


www.nationalreview.com...

So everyone ford says was at the party deny her account

This third lady is even a lifelong friend of fords, and she even says it didn’t happen

Yet we still see so many democrats saying they know know Kavanaugh is guilty

So she doesn’t remember the time or place, and all of the people she claimed were there say she is wrong

If she can’t provide any other evidence, what more is there to look at?



I would bet money that this lady was named in the original letter.

That is why Grassley has been pressing the vote.

Every person she has named has said "nope".



This article is saying she was the third named witness

That means every single person she said was in the house are denying her claim


And everyone she said was there also didnt live in the area she claimed the home was.

Either she is lying or she is misidentify the person. Problem is after 35 years i can see why confusion would sit in. For me high school was 25 years ago and even i was attempting to recall details of a party. So as an experiment i called 3 friends from high school we all remembered the party very differently.

About the only thing we agreed on was the police showing up.


But you all remembered being there and knew the others were there....

Fords "witnesses" say they weren't even there and one doesnt even know Kavanaugh....


It's almost as if she just picked people at random from her friends in HS and just claimed they were there........



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Grambler

That's no reason not to believe her.



She should absolutely have an opportunity to testify before the committee, and she should also file a police report as the state is willing to investigate with no statute of limitations. Why hasn't she?

Next week will be interesting, don't you think?

I'll reserve judgment until then.

I've been weirded out enough today.

Goodnight!



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:24 PM
link   
Just got reminded....the 4th also said it didnt happen....went by PJ....senate judiciary spoken with him too.

So 4 people named by Ford have said "nope"....

Guess we need the final guy to make a statement.

She said 4 boys and 1 girl. We have 4 total denying it at this point....



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

The final guy would be whoever she said attacked her.

Kavanaugh already said it was not him.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:29 PM
link   
Story on PJ...Patrick J Smyth...denying being there....

www.cnn.com...


Committee, another former classmate of Brett Kavanaugh's denies attending a party like the one described in the allegation made by Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused the Supreme Court nominee of sexually assaulting her three decades ago when they were teenagers.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Just got reminded....the 4th also said it didnt happen....went by PJ....senate judiciary spoken with him too.

So 4 people named by Ford have said "nope"....

Guess we need the final guy to make a statement.

She said 4 boys and 1 girl. We have 4 total denying it at this point....


Nope that’s everyone

She said there were four people other than her there

They were pj Smyth, this woman heyser, Kavanaugh and his friend judge

That’s all four, which have all denied being at the party



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Looking at that carefully worded response, or as her attorney put it "simply put"...

Notice that the statement only says she was not at a party with Kavanaugh and did not know him.

What she does not say is that she does not remember being at the party described by Ford, or that she does not recall something happening to Ford. I don't blame the attorney for not getting into those details. She said only what was required.

However, this does leave open the possibility that the friend remembers the party, but it was someone else there, not Kavanaugh.


edit on 9/22/18 by BlueAjah because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 10:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: face23785

There must be something about Thursday. They insist that Thursday is better than Wednesday. Why?


This past Thursday, C.Ford's attorney stated that the earliest Christine would be available, is Thursday 9/27/18.

Source via ATS: www.abovetopsecret.com...




top topics



 
69
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join