It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -12-

page: 21
134
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whereismyusername




voat


I do not know this word. if you please...


en.m.wikipedia.org...




posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 01:53 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 


(post by vinifalou removed for a manners violation)

posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: pavil

Because the New York Times does not play politics with the news no matter what trump tells you to believe.
He is not "one of their own" and this should pretty well prove that. The times has an agenda... to report all of the news. .



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou

No I dont.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:02 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

They don't?

Look up Walter Duranty. How someone covering things in the former USSR could completely miss the famine in the Ukraine and call his coverage of the place "fair" is beyond me, but he won a Pulitzer for his work.


The NYT has been like that ever since.
edit on 22-9-2018 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pavil

Because the New York Times does not play politics with the news no matter what trump tells you to believe.
He is not "one of their own" and this should pretty well prove that. The times has an agenda... to report all of the news. .


You mean like when they reported Kavanaughs friend Mark Judge said he DID remember the incident, then had to retract it because he actually didnt?

LOL....

Here's the link so you can read it.

www.nytimes.com... ons

And the footnote after they had it up for an hour....


Correction: September 18, 2018
An earlier version of this article misstated what Mark Judge told the Senate Judiciary Committee. He said that he does not remember the episode, not that he does.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Elostone




I think when these documents are released unredacted, they will show that the NYT was not only complicit but played a major role in crimes that have been committed.

And they know it.

SHE WASN'T SUPPOSED TO LOSE




I am not quite sure about RR. Sometimes he appears as a black hat then a white hat then a gray hat. I think the brackets are merely saying to watch him.

I totally agree about the NYT. You really can't trust them, and I think they were all in for the Clinton cabal.

When you read their articles while "awake", you can see how they put things together out of context or totally unrelated to create a picture that is misleading. They were the go-to rag for decades, so it's hard to break the mindset that they can be trusted to be factually accurate in the telling of a story.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:07 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pavil

Because the New York Times does not play politics with the news no matter what trump tells you to believe.
He is not "one of their own" and this should pretty well prove that. The times has an agenda... to report all of the news. .


You are not awake. You don't "see" it. You can't see it....yet.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

That is hilarious.....seriously, hilarious.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pavil

Because the New York Times does not play politics with the news no matter what trump tells you to believe.
He is not "one of their own" and this should pretty well prove that. The times has an agenda... to report all of the news. .


You are not awake. You don't "see" it. You can't see it....yet.



I just want to give you a high 5, for your optimism, your loving charitable attitude, and the demonstration that butting heads, is ultimately not moving our species forward.



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:24 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

I think we may be on to something...A thread slide was started right after I posted it!

edit on 9221818 by Elostone because: Forgot my beer

ETA the Q drop I posted there fits nicely too
edit on 9221818 by Elostone because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: pavil
The whole thing with Rosenstein makes me scratch my head.

If it is true and he is a "Black Hat", why did the NY Times out one of their own allies then? That makes absolutely no sense to me.......


Things don't add up. I'm not a Rosenstein Fan from what I've seen of his delaying tactics of releasing documents, ect. I don't think he is on Trumps side on this.......

The timing and the release of this information right now just makes my Spidey Sense go off. It's a little too convenient.......



My feeling is NYT and the other soon to be losers see RR as too compromised to be effective anymore. So they are trying to kill 2 birds with 1 stone. Put out some just damaging enough to bait Trump to fire him and let Trump take the backlash for take their now useless chess piece off the table.

Trump would want a now hopelessly compromised piece heading the investigation against him as it destroys the credibility of the investigation. Only downside for Trump is that it does cause delays on investigations to the real collusion which was against him.

I'm not even going to pretend to know all the workings of this but, an honest investigator would have turned this investigation towards the players who who really behind it: HRC, McStain, complicit MSM, etc... IMHO, the stalling has had a negative effect going towards mid-terms. FISA DECLAS should have happened a few months ago as the fallout once public will still take time to spread. I think it is too late to see indictments before mid-terms and that would have been a big time advantage going into them.
edit on 22-9-2018 by Strate8 because: Spellings and capitalization



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 03:13 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 03:16 PM
link   

Reminder...

TO BE READ and FOLLOWED BY ALL:


After a long conversation and consensus among Staff including Mods, Super Mods, Admins and Owners, we are posting the following reminders:

  • We don't want to shut the thread down or stifle debate.
  • The T&C must be followed by everyone.
  • No Political Trolling.....either in words or images.
  • Forum gangs or the illusion of a special group will not be tolerated.
    That includes "Q'ult" and Q team and similar references!!!
  • PG, walnut sauce and any other type of pedo talk will not be tolerated. Those topics belong in RATS.
  • External material must be sourced.
    Please see the DMCA policy page
  • Members are always responsible for their own posts.
  • Stay on topic......
  • Members who repeatedly disregard the T&C may face temporary posting bans or permanent banning.





    and, as always:

    Do NOT reply to this post!!


  • (post by Sabrechucker removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)
    (post by Quadrivium removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

    posted on Sep, 22 2018 @ 06:18 PM
    link   
    “Hillary Clinton and her cronies have access to all of the digital keys for all transactions on the planet." - Michael McKibben

    This guy deserves an applause: Alliterayshun


    RelSciHistItSufi, deserves MUCH praise.



    We definitely are NOT digging into FBCA enough.

    Agreed.



    “So literally, these keys are used in every transaction on the planet that uses the Internet and what we’ve discovered and – I’m still reeling, my mind is boggled by what we’ve now come to find out, but that a company called Entrust was created in 1998 as a spin-off of a Canadian telephone company [Nortel, a now-defunct Canadian telecommunications conglomerate, with people like former US Secretary of Defense, Frank Carlucci on its Board of Directors. Its 2009 bankruptcy was the largest in Canadian history, leaving pensioners and shareholders with staggering losses while Nortel executives continued to draw “retention bonuses” totaling US$190 million during the eight-year post-bankruptcy period].

    “That is just astounding, how a private individual could have come to have such power but the facts are now clear, that’s the circumstance we’re in right now. This includes almost all of the agencies, executive agencies of the government and that includes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Department of Treasury, Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), General Services Agency (GSA), the Department of State, the Department of Energy, the US Post Office, the US Patent Office, the US Marine Corps, the US Coast Guard and on and on and on and then beyond that, we see the names of most of the major telecommunications players in Canada, in Scandinavia, in Denmark. According to their records they have over 2,000 key customers and therefore, the Clintons through their Director, his name is Jerry C Jones, have access to the entire back door of the Internet.”

    Organization And Communication Structure Of The Swamp

    Thanks: Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben

    edit on 22-9-2018 by eisegesis because: release the hounds



    new topics

    top topics



     
    134
    << 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

    log in

    join