TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -12-

LATERAL THINKING re 5:5

At several points Q has gone days without posting.

We've had 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 20 day periods when Q has gone dark - but we have never had 5.

We are up to 4 days 16 hours in the current period. At 20:42 we will hit 5 days.

What if 5:5 has a secondary meaning of:

[5] days darkness
[:] DECLAS = Eyes On... See the light
[5] days darkness to let the dust settle and execute whatever post-DECLAS actions have been pre-planned?

If correct then this would mean Q's next post between this evening after 20:42 and tomorrow before 20:42.

Sunday evening or Monday would be a good time to drop the DECLAS?

a reply to: dashen

Truth is this whole situation is starting to read more and more like Albert Pike's plan to destroy the world. Pit nationalists against socialists to bring everything Crashing Down and then have people clamor for a one world government

It sounds sexier when you say it.

Maybe I should be more forthcoming?

Some days ago I wrote about Ocean Infinity starting the search for Argentine sub ARA San Juan. The same company that is also still looking for MH370. I remarked how the end of their search window for the submarine is very close to the midterm elections.

So let me entertain you with a little bit of trivia:

The ARA San Juan is a TR-1700-class submarine with a length of 67.30 m (220.8 ft)

MH370 is a Boeing 777-200ER with a length of 63.73 m (209 ft 1 in)


That's pretty close, don't you think? Probably something to do with the specs of experimental ocean based wormhole technology... Q X-files theme.

Kentucky rally... Does anyone know what song Rand Paul came out to? I immediately thought it sounded like it could be Magic Sword. Wouldn't that be crazy
@20 seconds
youtu.be...

EDIT: Found the song. Unfortunately It's not Magic Sword. It's Double Helix by Ethan Meixsell.

a reply to: queenofswords

Below is my own typed transcript of the video starting when MadMaxine first starts talking. Bold emphasis shows the parts that make me go hmmmm, and the hair stand up....

Maxine: well you know i don't know, i think some people are missing something here. The president has put in place, an organization that contains a kind of data base that no one has ever seen in life. And that is going to be very very powerful and whoever

Dude: (organizing for America that he is now shifting to become a 501C4)

Maxine: that's right, that's right. and that data base will have information on everything and every individual in ways that it has never been done before, and whoever runs for president on the democratic ticket has to deal with that. They're going to have to go down with that database and the concerns of those people of because they can't get around it. and he's been very smart i mean it's very powerful what he's leaving place and i think that's what any democratic candidate is gonna have to deal with.

In addition to bold emphasis, I also underlined some of the key phrases that have me puzzled. Such as "put in place and ORGANIZATION". What organization would this be? And the dude eludes to the idea that bummer is taking this with him to a 501c4, but then Maxine says 'LEAVING in place. But just prior to this statement, she talks about the DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE.

And i find the phrase "They're going to have to go down with that database" very very odd.

So it makes me question the idea that this said 'database' was put in place FOR the democrats and could it be that bummer took, or tried to take, it with him. The word POWER kept sticking in my head and it makes bummers speech about the transition of the presidency when Trump won. It seems he spoke of the 'transition of the presidency' but then skirted around the phrase 'transition of power'. There is a video, but I'm failing to find it right now.....

ETA: Here is the 'body language ghost' talking about bummers speech with hrc. bummer starts at 5:55. She points out that there is a distinction between the 'transition of the presidencies' but not the 'transition of power'.

a reply to: Jusvistn

Q's statement that these people are evil seems to cover it.

I'm certain our people have something similar with which to combat such a thing.

Even during his administration, there were white hats in the shadows keeping tabs and taking care of us.

a reply to: Jusvistn

Very interesting.

Just a thought to keep in the margins of your mind:

That horrific Office of Personnel Management data breach happened in 2014.
The Obama Foundation, a Chicago-based nonprofit organization, was founded in 2014.

Dude: (organizing for America that he is now shifting to become a 501C4)

hmmm...now that is interesting. Found an article that explains the differences in a 501(c)3 and 501(c)4:
www.nj.com...

Keep an eye on this foundation and all its connections.

ETA: Remember the huge Sony Pictures hack? It happened in 2014, too. Lots of valuable personal data stolen.

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: queenofswords

Might be worth compiling a list of all of the hacks that took place and timeline them out. Nothing like a terrorist in the white house stealing peoples data and possible identities?

If I remember correctly, there were some pretty significant and credible threats being made against members and past members of the military around the same time.

We received notification that our names/info may have been included in some of those stolen during that breach.

ETA: If he did take this data with him, wouldn't that ultimately be stolen government data? If was compiled while he was in office and by government entities, it would be against the law.

And if it was compiled by a 'private' organization, wouldn't that be a conflict that the President is not allowed to be part of?

a reply to: Jusvistn

I've made mention in threads before that Obama's group (Organizing for America, I think) came into places and took information from the local Democrat Party apparatus and was ostensibly working with them, but it turned into a one-way street sort of thing. They gobbled up money and resources and did not reciprocate and they started to starve out the party apparatus.

There were articles about it if you looked. You sort of had to read between the lines in some places, but that was what was taking place. It was a replacement game, not an alliance.

CaP, Have no idea what song that was, lol, never been much of a " Metal " girl...

I had missed Rand Paul's speech yesterday, so thanks for posting, loved when he said " Trump grows on you ".... I think that's true !

a reply to: Jusvistn

Remember the enormous data breach (hundreds of millions of user acct. credentials)
of Yahoo? Yep...2014.

Something has been on my mind for days. I'm totally willing to believe that it's just a form of paranoia stemming from the subconscious realization that we are a society on the verge of meltdown. That is to say that the idea itself may not come to pass but the underlying "fear" itself is well justified. Powder-kegs eventually blow. History itself teaches us this fact.

What has been on my mind is that if the Republicans take the mid-terms we are about to learn exactly what 11:11 means. That gives a few days after the elections for the violent mindless zombies to simmer in yet another defeat and for "organizers" to get the ball rolling.

A little thinking ahead can't hurt is all I'm saying. Stay safe.

a reply to: ketsuko

This is exactly why I think 44 was a foreign actor, a Muslim.

Did you see the prayer room at the WH? Prayer rugs and Muslim paraphernalia.

a reply to: The GUT

We will deal with it and the country will be better off when the leftist demonic rage is finally spent and we can all get on with MAGA.

originally posted by: The GUT
Something has been on my mind for days. I'm totally willing to believe that it's just a form of paranoia stemming from the subconscious realization that we are a society on the verge of meltdown. That is to say that the idea itself may not come to pass but the underlying "fear" itself is well justified. Powder-kegs eventually blow. History itself teaches us this fact.

What has been on my mind is that if the Republicans take the mid-terms we are about to learn exactly what 11:11 means. That gives a few days after the elections for the violent mindless zombies to simmer in yet another defeat and for "organizers" to get the ball rolling.

A little thinking ahead can't hurt is all I'm saying. Stay safe.

I agree. We should all stay vigilant with respect to our environment. The left has gone anarchist and violence plays a key role in their agenda.

a reply to: queenofswords

Interesting to note that one of the hacks in 2014

Trump Hotels

Per the info found on Wiki

originally posted by: Skyfloating
All I know is that liberals are out of touch with whats going on. Thats because rich white old men like George Soros, dictate their agenda. There's delicious irony in that.

#MAGA

so that lets you make up your own facts, because you're so much more in touch with reality?

that makes sense

originally posted by: Strate8
Which means she either corruptly stuffed ballot boxes or there are about 3 million too many morally corrupt/stupid people in this country.

again, if you've decided you're the smartest little wolfie in the room and reality is whatever 'facts' you want to make up...

not much i can say about it. it's your brain.

originally posted by: Skyfloating
If Dems are so popular, why are their minions being arrested for vote fraud? The facts speak for themselves.

In spite of all the MSM lies, still not enough votes. You keep telling yourself how awesome and popular "Democrats" are.

i know it's fun to just go off in whatever random free-association direction you want to, but your reply ought to have at least something to do with your original claim, which is that you don't believe the official vote totals because you think hillary couldn't be popular because you don't like things about her.

maybe if you kept notes you could see the discontinuity of logic, going from A to B to Z?