TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -12-

Maybe I Ought to Say Thank You

McConnell Says Anti-Kavanaugh 'Mob' Helped Unify GOP

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
He made it. 50-49

I'm reading it was actually 50-48.

Not that it matters really. Justice prevailed today. 👍

2 new Q's.....

2340
Oct 06 2018 15:28:45
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
349
twitter.com...
POLITICAL HIT by D's.
REGAIN POWER BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.
NEW NARRATIVE COMING.
Q


2339
Oct 06 2018 15:08:23
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
348
D_Party.png
WELCOME TO THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.
The Party of threats, violence, intimidation, name-calling, racism, fascism, division, …..
#WALKAWAY
#VOTEREPUBLICAN
Q

Q on Q

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Q was pretty darn close.

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Q was pretty darn close.

Q predicted 53-47 I thought?

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Q was pretty darn close.

Q predicted 53-47 I thought?

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

Yep.

I guess no way to know exactly who would show up right? It's close.

twitter.com...

Trailer.

Interesting timing.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

But wrong none the less. Again...

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Maybe this explains why so many of my in-laws are freaky

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: tiredoflooking

But wrong none the less. Again...

No, actually, Q wasn't wrong....

Senate votes 53-47 to defeat Saudi Arabia arms deal block

Posted this a page or three back, but there were some other discussions going on that you may have missed it.

ETA: I know that it is a dated article, but if memory serves me correctly, it was some of the info that Q had eluded to early on. I don't remember ever actually finding this information when searching using the original Qlues, but found it by doing a DDG search for "Senate vote 53-47" and this was what seemed relevant to previous topics

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Is this an official account?

a reply to: Joecanada11

Q is not a prophet, or omnipotent. They are high level insiders in the US Government. Well informed? Yes. Infallible? No.

In any case, Q predicted that Kavanaugh would be confirmed...at a time when it looked like he'd be going down in sexual misconduct allegations. That's another "future proves past" for me.

a reply to: vinifalou

No.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Q was pretty darn close.

Q predicted 53-47 I thought?

he was describing the balance of the Senate after the midterm elections. 53 Republicans 47 Democrats.

Actually, Q did not associate those numbers to anything. he could have been referencing the IQs of Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein for all we know.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

ToL, did you see this Majestic 12 picture, further down on the same account from Oct 3rd. It seems VERY relevant to "WATCH the WATER":




twitter.com

No one has to make excuses for Q not being 100% all the time. Life has variables that are incalculable. You can only take Pie so far.

Then you might want to throw in there that there are forces working to undermine "Q"s efforts. And not all of them live down here with us

Q, your doing one hell of a job!!! Carry On.

Now, to the plan................

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

No I didn't but that is neat.

They post a lot of intetesting stuff.

They aren't official, but do have intersting info!

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Excellent post.

Let's continue to shake things up.

Kavanaugh's lawyer, Beth Wilkinson, is a high-powered, Washington D.C. lawyer who represented multiple top Clinton aides involved in the FBI email investigation during the campaign. She's also a long-time Democratic booster, and is married to CNN contributor David Gregory.

www.tmz.com...