It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Tight Pants Are Population Control

page: 1
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 09:51 PM
link   
[insert ridiculous pants meme here]

Over the past 10 years or so there's been this trend, amongst certain demographics, of males wearing excessively tight jeans (from ankles to testes). For a lot of males, observing them in play is like a culture shock. Traditionally "capri" pants, for example, were the domain of females. And for them they can wear as tight as -whatever- they want down low, as their reproductive organs are built on the inside. For males this just isnt the case, and for specific biological reasons.


"Any exposure [to heat] that significantly increases temperature is likely to affect spermatogenesis [or sperm production]," says Dr. Jorge Chavarro, associate professor of nutrition and epidemiology at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and an author on the study. "That's the main reason we have scrotums and testes that are external to the abdomen." By hanging below the torso, testicles stay cooler — by about 4 to 6 degrees, typically — than the rest of the body. That helps them make happy, functional sperm cells. But when you slap on a pair of briefs, that natural cooling system is disrupted. Your dangly bits are held close to your abdomen and they heat up, harming sperm production. www.npr.org...

The temperature of the testes is at issue: In order for testes to produce sufficient quality and quantity of sperm, the temperature of testes must be lower than the core body temperature. "That is why [testes] are located outside of the body," explains Celia E. Dominguez, reproductive endocrinologist, Center for Reproductive Medicine at the Emory University School of Medicine. "Testes were made to be out in the breeze." Testes can overheat when a man wears brief underwear. If the testes are too hot -- several degrees above where they should be -- they are not able to produce sufficient sperm, resulting in low sperm count. www.webmd.com...



Although men continue to make fresh sperm, the quality decreases with age. So contrary to popular belief, men over 40 are about half as fertile as men under 25. This means it may take longer for their partner to become pregnant. www.bbc.co.uk...


Now whats fascinating is how the sorts most likely to get into wearing such pants, at all, let alone as a norm, typically tend to be of the type to be into what people are these days calling "liberal politics". I suppose the logic goes that tight pants is a "gender roles" sort of issue, and they're all about squashing that sort of jazz these days.

Now for some of us, observing this mass obsession with gender studies, and all their variants on sexuality, well plain and simple, Thomas Malthus (the original population control maniac) point blank suggested compelling the population towards homosexuality in order to prevent the population exploded beyond the "carrying capacity" of the lands.

So now in the modern era, we have the "liberal" politicians and their ilk for decades running now screaming about the Earth being over-populated to the scope of every degree of literal apocalypse, unless something is done about it. So de-urbanization coupled with various appeals (some veiled, some not so much) has been like daily milk & cookies for a lot of these types, quite frankly stuff that can be traced back to this sort of noise has been more and more the outright DNC (the supposed "liberal" party) platform over the past decade.

I suppose the one main plank of this "new liberalism platform", its still heavily obsessed with open borders and mass migration of poor immigrants. Now if one digs deep into their logic, the point that a diminishing population is a literal disaster on a quazi-socialist economy. Just look at what happened to Russia post-Cold War, or for a more specific direction dig into what would happen to Social Security if there werent enough people paying into it to cover the older generations. But I'm digressing.

What we know for sure is that poor people reproduce more than those whom are not (much like poverty is the worst thing possible for local environments). Yet importing poverty is also, apparently, the agenda. The point is, its obvious there's a de-population agenda within that brand of politics, whether its subscribers acknowledge it or not, its so entrenched that the "Media At Large" that has handed them their fashion trend (which I surmise started with MTV's "Emo" scene) has instituted nut hugging garments that lowers their sperm count, yet assuming de-populating the earth is a worthy and logical agenda, in my view their moves towards that end are scattershot and misguided at best. Which begs other questions...




posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 09:56 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Bro it's not even Saturday yet. 🙄



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:27 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I totally agree that this is not beneficial to human progress. I know I have talked about my leggings being worn under my shorts but in no way are they constricting my you know what. They have a certain space for those...

I used to pick on those EMO kids for doing this in high school because then and now it makes no sense.

Levi 541 is the way to go for a dude. Other than that get tailored suits. Simple as that.



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:31 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Sorry IIB. I was a fat kid growing up and rarely had fitting pants. Thinned out in my early twenties a little and suffice to say, I've had no problems in the baby makin department!



However, I dunno if guys like me are the exception or the rule. Just an anecdote.



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:34 PM
link   
Guys in the hood who wear pants that look like they're always falling off, make the most babies.



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:35 PM
link   
seems like a stretch

not stretch-pants... just a stretch



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:40 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Couple that with high levels of estrogen in the water supply and you've got yourself a problem!



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Couple that with high levels of estrogen in the water supply and you've got yourself a problem!




Gay bombs???



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:44 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Geez , Thank God Today's " Man " Doesn't have Camel Toes..........



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:44 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Doesn't really constrict anything when you only wear them up to the bottom of your buttocks like most guys I see around these parts.....

A2D



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:44 PM
link   
Can sex-change recipients make babies?



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Allaroundyou

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Couple that with high levels of estrogen in the water supply and you've got yourself a problem!




Gay bombs???


Gay bombs.



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Tight pants are population control.


Baggy pants are population degeneration.




posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 10:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating


Optimally, you'd wear a towel to keep the engine breathing, like Anthony Weiner preferred.



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 11:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating



Those arent even "baggy" per se, its more like a skirt with capri pants sewed onto the bottom.
edit on 20-9-2018 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 11:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Skyfloating

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Tight pants are population control.


Baggy pants are population degeneration.



That style always makes me think of like a baby in a onesie or something..maybe it's just me..



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 11:13 PM
link   
I seem to recall dudes wearing tight pants in the eighties, jeans and leather, and let's not forget parachute pants.




originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: DBCowboy

Geez , Thank God Today's " Man " Doesn't have Camel Toes..........


It's pickle toe for men.
edit on 20-9-2018 by TiggersTheMan because: Ross & the leather pants



posted on Sep, 20 2018 @ 11:15 PM
link   
Sure hope it works. Heaven knows we could use it. Obviously can't count on people to use their brains and use birth control. Gotta trick them into thinking they look cool.

"Hey bro. You look sick in them thangs!"

"Well, I haven't eaten in 6 months. I ought to look sick"



edit on 20-9-2018 by BrianFlanders because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-9-2018 by BrianFlanders because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 21 2018 @ 12:05 AM
link   
sometimes i open a thread on this site and it just..... really hits me in the face how god damn OLD most of you guys are.
Old Man Shakes Fist At Cloud [and Declares Clouds a Conspiracy] or what



posted on Sep, 21 2018 @ 01:37 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Thankfully these things are falling out of fashion around here man. Well, I guess if I go to the mall I may see at east three pairs of these. Its fair to say that is a tiny outlier. Its all good. I agree it is just stupid to wear pants that tight. From a personal security and/or preparedness standpoint its no good.

I do not believe it is easy to do a high kick in such attire.



new topics

top topics



 
16
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join