It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

DOJ Federal Employees ADMIT Using Their Positions To Hamper Trump's Administration

page: 2
31
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 19 2018 @ 01:34 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

Are you really that thick? We are NOT talking about people with different political beliefs. We ARE talking about people breaking the law. Have you heard of the Hatch Act? Oh, I get it...because they oppose Trump's Administration, we should just ignore it and call it "political freedom."



The Hatch Act of 1939 is a piece of United States federal legislation which prohibits federal employees, employees of the District of Columbia and certain employees of state and local governments from engaging in partisan political activity. The Act was named after Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico who protested the political involvement of federal employees in primaries and general elections and sponsored the bill that became the Hatch Act. In 1993, the Act was substantially amended. The 1993 amendments, 5 U.S.C.S. §§ 7321-7326, clarified the rights of federal employees to a great extent. The Act bars only the misuse of official authority or influence, and misuse of work place and official duties. The Hatch Act Reform Amendments of 1993 permit most federal employees to take an active part in partisan political management and partisan political campaigns. While federal employees are still prohibited from seeking public office in partisan elections, most employees are free to work, while off duty, on the partisan campaigns of the candidates of their choice. However, a small group of federal employees are subject to greater restrictions and continue to be prohibited from engaging in partisan political management and partisan political campaigns. The Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C.S. §§ 7321-7326, forbids employees of the United States and its agencies, generally, from politicizing the work place.

hatchact.uslegal.com...




posted on Sep, 19 2018 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed






posted on Sep, 19 2018 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: underwerks

Where did anyone say they should be vetted for their political beliefs?

They are hired to do a job and should not be hampering anything because of their own beliefs.
Just do your damn job.



What are they hampering, and how exactly are they doing it?

From the OP it seems that someone calling themselves a Democratic socialist is all it takes for them to be an enemy of the state.

What makes our government work is that it consists of people with varying political beliefs. If you want to change that and expel everyone from government who thinks different from you Russia is that way. I’m sure China and North Korea would be glad to have you as well.

The trash heap that is project veritas notwithstanding.



posted on Sep, 19 2018 @ 01:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
unelected elites within the government are working illicitly to invalidate our elections and undermine our government.

More harsh methods of getting rid of them are in order.


Now we’re talking. What do you recommend?

Drag them out and flog them if they don’t pledge loyalty to a right wing way of thinking? Military tribunals? Executions?

How should we treat people who hold different political beliefs?


Wow what an incredibly ignorant response.

So you admit these charlatans are left wingers who hate Trump, and you advocate using the left versus right defense when your team breaks laws, because defending punishment for them only means a person is really just bashing on your guys because they are right wingers.

No, just no. They break the law they go bye bye. Doesn't matter what side they are on. (I know, for you just being on the right side is a bad thing, and the left side is righteously justified and shouldn't be punished). As a matter of fact, this attitude of yours matches exactly how these charlatans are working to undermine our elected government.



Believe it or not, the government isn’t and has never been made up entirely of people who support the president.

I can tell that’s shocking news to a lot of people.



posted on Sep, 19 2018 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

Trash heap? Why, because they uncovered people breaking the law? We should only expel people from government who break the law.


most employees are free to work, while off duty, on the partisan campaigns of the candidates of their choice.


These people made conscious decisions to break the law, while at work, on the clock.


Stuart Karaffa Does Work for DSA While on Taxpayer’s Dime: “I’m careful about it. I don’t leave a paper trail.”



Hrabar uses her work computer to access Lexis Nexis: “I mean, she has used it, she uses it probably on her work computer.” Subramanian explains that this sort of information needs to be kept secret: “…that’s the kind of thing that you would get fired for…people do not have the silver bullet, the smoking gun or whatever. Um, if they were able to get proof of that, you know? So, we’re all walking that line.”



Hrabar herself appears to be using government-owned property to perform DSA activism. The video shows a meeting with Cliff Green, another DSA member, stating that Hrabar uses Lexis Nexis to find home addresses for DSA protests

www.projectveritas.com...

Project Veritas uncovered just 3 people who willingly do DSA activism while on the clock. How many more within the State Department and DOJ? This goes beyond people having different political beliefs...this is activism while on the job.



posted on Sep, 19 2018 @ 02:13 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny


I mean, she has used it, she uses it probably on her work computer.”


Well that’s open and shut. She uses it probably on her work computer. That definitely means she does, according to project veritas.

As usual, project veritas has edited the clip and interspersed it with leading commentary to promote their narrative. Which everyone here is just lapping up. Despite them being exposed for what they are time and time again.

The “ veritas”in the project veritas name holds the same weight as the “Democratic” in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.


edit on 19-9-2018 by underwerks because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 19 2018 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

The “ veritas”in the project veritas name holds the same weight as the “Democratic” in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.



Mhmm the same on the Democratic Party?

Maybe it's a standard.



posted on Sep, 19 2018 @ 03:10 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny

This is why President Trump met secretly with Putin and Kim Jong.. with nobody around. Very few can be trusted.



posted on Sep, 19 2018 @ 03:19 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

The narrative sure matched what I heard coming out of those people's mouths in those 'edited' video clips. I'm not sure why you didn't hear the same things as I did, but that's irrelevant. I've come to realize that the left deflect and come up with excuses, when commentary or articles don't 'promote their narrative.' It's all good, because people on the left say the same things about the right. The only thing that determines who's right, is the truth. That's why Schiff, Pelosi, Schumer, Warner are in full panic mode, about the FISA declassification...They don't want the truth to come out about the highly politicized 'Obama Deep State.'




top topics



 
31
<< 1   >>

log in

join