It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The greatest crime to society is not murder, theft, or property damage. It is people who have the potential to do great things, that squander the potential and do nothing with it.
I would adjust scoring for them to be based on their kids behavior. Low test scores is a mark against the parent. Poor behavior is a mark against the parents. And so on. Encourage good parenting again.
originally posted by: DoctorBluechip
You would create a miserable society in short order , you would destroy the meaning in life for everyone .
originally posted by: DoctorBluechip
Address your proposed adjustments to the values which societies and individuals would hold, as a sociologist and a psychologist would.
originally posted by: DoctorBluechip
What I value is up to me , currently , that's the norm being held . You're trying to change the norm to what you decree it should be .
I'm going to accuse you of having the ideas of a megalomaniac because of this.
originally posted by: StrangeQuark96
An unfortunate kid whose house burns down can no longer afford schooling, does that make them low graded citizens?
originally posted by: Blaine91555
It's simple really. You want to force your values on everyone else and are looking for a way to bypass individual freedoms using punishment as a tool. I think everyone understands what you are after here.
I'd suggest reading the history of the former Soviet Republic and how they used the Party and a reward / punishment system as a means of control. You play ball your a Party insider and get privileges, you don't walk in lockstep, your life is miserable. It did not work out too well for them.
Punishing people for listening to or reading speech you don't like is controlling speech. Your silly circular argument is absurd and I suspect you know that. I can almost see you smiling and laughing as you type. Is this whole conversation satire from you?
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Nothin
Oh crap!! Just had a flashback.
This is the 'poster' whom actually wrote that we need not teach children critical thinking, because ..."thinking is not necessary"..., and that 'folks don't need to learn about growing and catching food, because all sane people know that food comes from grocery stores' (paraphrased).
ATS thread on education
Feels more like a psyop, or AI trying to gauge how humans react to NWO ideas.
Subsistence is not a useful skill. Knowing how to engage in commerce and exchange something for food is.
If you do not possess both the knowledge and the means to grow food on an industrial scale, it is not useful. Under 1% of the population is currently farmers, and that number is falling.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
God I hope you are being satirical, if not .....