It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: CynConcepts
just out of curiosity, how old were you?
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: CynConcepts
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: CynConcepts
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Xtrozero
She says he tried to remove her clothes against her will. That's all that needs to have happened to be categorically defined as sexual assault.
Regardless of whether Kavanaugh did in fact assault Ford or not, you're making a lot of rape apologist arguments here. It really doesn't sound good.
Oh my goodness! If that is all that needs to happen a lot of kids who grew up in the 80s are going to be classed as sexual assaulters. It just happened to be a prank that kids did back then. Yank a boys swim trunks down or a girls bikini top. It was done in fun with friends. Yes, it was embarrassing, you would cover and run!
No one back then considered it to be sexual assault, but with your post quoted it seems that it is. Even worse if you can accuse someone now of such a charge! Rediculous. At this rate folks are going to be sexual assaulters for simply asking someone out in 2050!
Hmm, ok, just so I understand you clearly, you're intimating that if Kavanaugh held down this girl unwillingly and tried to remove her clothes, thats just 'kids being kids'?
Honestly, no one wanted their bikini loosened nor swim trunks ripped off. We all wiggled and ran to hide. It was horseplay. Now, whether this is simple misinterpreted horseplay or not in this case, I have no real facts...just saying it is possible.
Plus your original quote would tag me as some sexual assaulter since I did tackle a boy and wriggled his trunks off and dove in the lake. He was being a baby saying the water was too cold...so I forced him to swim to shore and collect his shorts by leaving him on the floating raft.
So naturally, I personally would like this to all be settled and determine whether my own past will come back and destroy my future.
Well so if I held you down against your will (lets just assume you don't know how devlishly handsome I am) such that it was clearly something you didn't want, and try and remove your top, your bra, your pants, etc, that you would be fine with that?
You may be the first female rape/sexual assault apologist I've met, so that's a new one for me.
For the record if you did that to the boy now you would indeed be at risk of being charged with sexual assault. Just because the culture of the past had its own way doesn't make it right. That's why things like slavery, women not voting, etc are bygone relics and not pillars of our great nation that we cherish.
originally posted by: dawnstar
preventing her from leaving the room...
pushing her into the bed and holding her down...
holding his hand over her mouth to keep her from screaming
two things come to mind... false imprisonment and assault...
originally posted by: Wayfarer
Sure, its entirely possible she is lying or making this up for an agenda. I can't make an assumption one way or another without some kind of investigation or deeper dive into the accusations (and neither can anyone else for that matter).
originally posted by: darkbake
I don't think the accuser counts as defaming Kavanaugh's character because what she is saying is probably true. As for not testifying, she is going to testify on Monday.
New York Times: Hearing Set for Monday to Hear Kavanaugh and his Accuser
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: darkbake
I don't think the accuser counts as defaming Kavanaugh's character because what she is saying is probably true. As for not testifying, she is going to testify on Monday.
New York Times: Hearing Set for Monday to Hear Kavanaugh and his Accuser
Just curious, how do you know what she is saying is probably true?
originally posted by: darkbake
I don't think the accuser counts as defaming Kavanaugh's character because what she is saying is probably true. As for not testifying, she is going to testify on Monday.
New York Times: Hearing Set for Monday to Hear Kavanaugh and his Accuser
originally posted by: darkbake
I don't think the accuser counts as defaming Kavanaugh's character because what she is saying is probably true. As for not testifying, she is going to testify on Monday.
New York Times: Hearing Set for Monday to Hear Kavanaugh and his Accuser
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: CynConcepts
I grew up in the 70's.... and no we didn't undress each other like you were.
and 17 is a long shot from 14...
you'd think that by that age, you'd have outgrown those childish games.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: darkbake
I don't think the accuser counts as defaming Kavanaugh's character because what she is saying is probably true. As for not testifying, she is going to testify on Monday.
New York Times: Hearing Set for Monday to Hear Kavanaugh and his Accuser
The date is set, but she has gone dark and wont respond. They are planning on nixing the hearing if she does not reply to numerous requests to appear.
Seems she may be a bit worried her lie is about to be major news.....and likely destroy any credibility she has....
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: darkbake
I don't think the accuser counts as defaming Kavanaugh's character because what she is saying is probably true. As for not testifying, she is going to testify on Monday.
New York Times: Hearing Set for Monday to Hear Kavanaugh and his Accuser
The date is set, but she has gone dark and wont respond. They are planning on nixing the hearing if she does not reply to numerous requests to appear.
Seems she may be a bit worried her lie is about to be major news.....and likely destroy any credibility she has....
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: darkbake
I don't think the accuser counts as defaming Kavanaugh's character because what she is saying is probably true. As for not testifying, she is going to testify on Monday.
New York Times: Hearing Set for Monday to Hear Kavanaugh and his Accuser
The date is set, but she has gone dark and wont respond. They are planning on nixing the hearing if she does not reply to numerous requests to appear.
Seems she may be a bit worried her lie is about to be major news.....and likely destroy any credibility she has....
As long as she doesn't go on official record he can't sue her. The moment she testifies falsely he can take her to court.