It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
....Current history evidences that the System you are trying to support has failed us and is in dire need of re-structuring and this means following due course....
Well guess what, many people don't, I certainly don't....but I don't go around offering sycophantic support to a man who is trying to use his wealth and influence to slander someone with impunity just because his feelings got hurt.
originally posted by: YouSir
Regardless of how we all speculate...the ball is now in Mr. Unsworths court to disprove...
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: one4all
You seem to be an absolute expert in identifying pedophiles and their behavior, why is that?
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: one4all
Does the phrase "innocent 'til proven guilty" mean anything at all to you??
Zero tolerance? OK, but does that come before, or after, the trial that's proven them guilty?
Think carefully, before answering. As your answer might, some day, apply to more than just "accused" pedophiles.
As Freeborn suggested. Since you seem "to know", time to put up, or shut up.
originally posted by: one4all
Augie...you need to get your game back....things are getting vanilla lately...thats as lukewarm as the dishwater....lol.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: one4all
Augie...you need to get your game back....things are getting vanilla lately...thats as lukewarm as the dishwater....lol.
Nonetheless, it's true. You seem to be able to identify pedophiles without evidence. Either you have the world's greatest pedo-dar or you happen to circulate with enough of them to know one when you see one.
I lean towards the latter. You should get help, that's a very sick problem you have.
originally posted by: one4all
Augie...evidence is for Courts of law not the Peoples Review.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: one4all
Augie...evidence is for Courts of law not the Peoples Review.
Says the ultimate pedo-identifier as he sides with Musktard's non-evidentiary statements.
You: 'I'm all for the law, except when I'm not'.
Hop back in the Scooby Pedo Van and track down some more baddies.
originally posted by: Flavian
a reply to: one4all
Musk is a silly man for what he said. You're defending him on the basis that he must know something due to his wealth and it is the other guys responsibility to prove that he isn't a pedo.
By that logic, isn't the onus now on you to prove that you are not a pedo?
See, it doesn't really work like that, does it?
originally posted by: Flavian
You do realise Unsworth is married to a 40 year old, not a child bride? And you are still defaming him at every opportunity. And yet you keep defending Musk who is exhibiting clear signs of a breakdown.
I have to ask........Elon, is that you?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Flavian
I still want to know how Musktard and his fappers know unequivocally how someone is a pedo. Methinks it's a certain level of familiarity they've acquired via unsavory predilections.