Woman accusing Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct comes forward

a reply to: RalagaNarHallas


Looks like there's more info here.

Martha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh was a Maryland district judge in 1996. In an amazing coincidence, Martha Kavanaugh was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey-Ford’s parents were the defendants. Now it all becomes clear. Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh, not because of what he did in high school. Instead, Christine Blasey-Ford is going after Brett Kavanaugh out of spite and revenge for a case rulled on by Brett Kavanaugh mother. Martha Kavanaugh, Brett’s mother was Montgomery County Circuit Court judge from 1993 until she retired in 2001. During a 1996 foreclosure case, Martha Kavanaugh ruled against the parents of Christine Blasey-Ford in a foreclosure case.

The foreclosure case against Paula K. Blasey and Ralph G. Blasey was opened on August 8, 1996. The case number is 156006V.

archive.fo...-511.0-523.1

Apparently, Feinstein gave her plentyof time to scrub all her social media activity which the majority of happened this last week and weekend. This is looking more and more like a vendetta rather than a valid allegation.

To continue with information of the claim from above, here is the link and info from State of Maryland

casesearch.courts.state.md.us...


Circuit Court of Maryland

Go Back Now


Case Information


Court System: Circuit Court for Montgomery County - Civil System
Case Number: 156006V Sub Type: FORECLOSURE

Date Filed: 08/08/1996
Case Status: CLOSED



Plaintiff Information

(Each Alias, Address, and Attorney for the Plaintiff is displayed)
Name: UMLIC-EIGHT CORP A NORTH CAROLINA CORP

Address: 7415 PINEVILLE MATTHEWS 1010
CHARLOTTE NC 28200


Attorney(s) for the Plaintiff


Name: PRICE, RICHARD M

Address: PEABODY & BROWN
1255 23RD STREET N.W. #800
WASHINGTON DC 20037

Phone: 202-973-7700



Defendant Information

(Each Alias, Address, and Attorney for the Defendant is displayed)
Name: BLASEY, RALPH G

Address: 17 MASTERS COURT
POTOMAC MD 20854


Name: BLASEY, PAULA K

Address: 17 MASTERS COURT
POTOMAC MD 20854



Issues Information


Issue: FORECLOSURE
Issue: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY



Document Tracking


Docket Date: 08/08/1996 Docket Number: 1
Docket Description: PETITION
Docket Type: Docket Filed By: Plaintiff
Docket Text: PETITIONER'S PETITION TO FORECLOSE AND FOR SALE OF PROPERTY, EXHIBITS A1-6 & B, STATEMENT OF MORTGAGE DEBT, AND CERTIFIED COPY OF ASSIGNMENT (EXHIBIT B) FILED.


Docket Date: 08/08/1996 Docket Number: 2
Docket Description: MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: MILITARY AFFIDAVIT, FILED.


Docket Date: 08/08/1996 Docket Number: 3
Docket Description:
Docket Type: Motion Filed By: Plaintiff Status: Open
Docket Text: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FILING A NOMINAL BOND FILED.


Docket Date: 08/09/1996 Docket Number: 4
Docket Description:
Docket Type: Docket Filed By: Plaintiff
Docket Text: MEMORANDUM SENT GIVING NOTICE OF NEW CASE NUMBER FILED.


Docket Date: 08/13/1996 Docket Number: 5
Docket Description: ORDER OF COURT
Docket Type: Docket
Ruling Judge: MASON, MICHAEL D
Docket Text: ORDER OF COURT (MASON, J./RICE, M.) GRANTING PETION FOR SALE OF PROPERTY; THAT HARRY J. KELLY IS HEREBY APPOINTED TRUSTEE TO MAKE THE SALE, TRUSTEE SHALL FILE A BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF ($5,000.00) AND CONTINUE WITH THE TERMS OF THE SALE FILED. (COPIES MAILED)


Docket Date: 09/19/1996 Docket Number: 6
Docket Description:
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: REVISED STATEMENT OF MORTGAGE DEBT FILED.


Docket Date: 09/19/1996 Docket Number: 7
Docket Description:
Docket Type: Docket Filed By: Plaintiff
Docket Text: RICHARD M. PRICE, ATTORNEY'S CERTIFICATION AS TO RULE 1-31- FOR ADMITTANCE TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE OF MARYLAND FILED.


Docket Date: 09/24/1996 Docket Number: 8
Docket Description: BOND & APPROVAL IN THE AMOUNT OF
Docket Type: Docket Filed By: Plaintiff
Docket Text: BOND AND APPROVAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000.00 FILED.


Docket Date: 01/27/1997 Docket Number: 9
Docket Description: MOTION, DISMISS
Docket Type: Motion Filed By: Plaintiff Status: Granted
Ruling Judge: KAVANAUGH, MARTHA G
Reference Docket(s): Ruling: 10
Docket Text: PLAINTIFF'S VOLUNTARY MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR RETURN OF BOND FILED.


Docket Date: 02/04/1997 Docket Number: 10
Docket Description:
Docket Type: Ruling Status: Granted
Ruling Judge: KAVANAUGH, MARTHA G
Reference Docket(s): Motion: 9
Docket Text: ORDER OF COURT (KAVANAUGH, J./RICE, M.) THAT THE VOLUNTARY MOTION TO DISMISS IS HEREBY GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE AND THAT THE BOND FILED BY HARRY J. KELLY AS TRUSTEE SHALL BE RELEASED AND RETURNED FILED. (COPIES MAILED (


Docket Date: 02/04/1997 Docket Number: 11
Docket Description: SUBSTITUTE COPY FOR ORIGINAL
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: COPY OF TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST/BOND NO. B126904-BLASEY AND POWER OF ATTORNEY, FIXED IN LIEU OF ORIGINAL FILED.


Docket Date: 02/04/1997 Docket Number: 12
Docket Description: ORIGINAL DEED OF TRUST & NOTE MAILED
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: ORIGNIAL TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST/BOND NO. B126904, WITHDRAWN AND MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED FROM RICHARD M. PRICE FILED.


Docket Date: 03/03/1997 Docket Number: 13
Docket Description: RETURN RECEIPT
Docket Type: Docket
Docket Text: RETURN RECEIPT FILED.


Go Back

This is an electronic case record. Full case information cannot be made available either because of legal restrictions on access to case records found in Maryland Rules, or because of the practical difficulties inherent in reducing a case record into an electronic format.

a reply to: StoutBroux

Seems that there is more to this than the way it's been presented, fact checking:

www.snopes.com...

These accounts got only the background facts right while wildly misrepresenting the key details and amounting to a gross misrepresentation of what actually took place.

Martha Kavanaugh did preside for certain parts of a 1996 foreclosure case involving Ralph and Paula Blasey, who are indeed Christine Blasey Ford’s parents. However, Kavanaugh actually ruled favorably toward the Blaseys, who ended up keeping their home. These two facts cause the logic of the conspiracy theory, such as it ever was, to collapse.

Background

Maryland state land records show that Ralph and Paula Blasey purchased a house in Potomac, Maryland, in June 1977. According to Montgomery County Circuit Court records, in August 1996 a company called UMLIC-Eight Corporation initiated foreclosure proceedings against the couple.

However, by December of that year the Blaseys were able to refinance the mortgage, and in January 1997 UMLIC filed a motion to dismiss their earlier petition. Judge Martha Kavanaugh granted that motion on 4 February 1997, thus formally bringing an end to the foreclosure proceedings against the Blaseys.

The claim that Kavanaugh “ruled against” Ralph and Paul Blasey, central to the conspiracy theory about their daughter’s sexual assault allegations made 21 years later, is therefore false.

a reply to: StoutBroux


Bingo! For more than 2 months, while Feinstein withheld the letter, the accuser was erasing her internet footprint. But Kavanaugh/Big Government have access to anything and everything anyway.. even "erased" information.

a reply to: SeaYote


I was a bit confused reading through that and thought I was missing something, lol.

LOL

Feinstein On Kavanaugh Accuser: 'I Can't Say That Everything Is Truthful'

Now, after all of this, Feinstein isn’t sure if Ford is being totally truthful. From Fox News’ Chad Pergram, Feinstein said, that Ford “is a woman that has been, I think, profoundly impacted, on this…I can't say that everything is truthful. I don't know."

💥😃💥

a reply to: Kharron

Well...here is the thing... "the boy", Mark Judge, whom she claims broke the attempted rape has stated none of this happened.

Here is another interesting fact... Even in your story it is shown that the therapist wrote something which "is fake," that several boys were involved in the attempted rape.

Did you know that therapists can actually lead people into believing something happened that "didn't happened"? That seems to be the case here.

To make it worse this woman has a motive to continue her false accusations. She is pro-Clinton and anti-Trump. Add all of it up and it should be obvious this is just a fake story.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: theatreboy

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Lumenari

How would you feel if you were molested years ago and not believed when you finally decided to come forward about it ?

How would you feel if you did nothing and were accused of molestation?

What's your point, should we dismiss all allegations of sexual assault on women ?

Think about it. She and her husband never said a word about this so-called event until it became politically desirable to do so. "OH, it was such a horrible event in my life. I felt so desperate and humiliated. Now that he is successful and about to become a supreme court justice I think I will finally make a critically timed political statement, er, clear my conscience."

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Kharron

Well...here is the thing... "the boy", Mark Judge, whom she claims broke the attempted rape has stated none of this happened.

Here is another interesting fact... Even in your story it is shown that the therapist wrote something which "is fake," that several boys were involved in the attempted rape.

Did you know that therapists can actually lead people into believing something happened that "didn't happened"? That seems to be the case here.

To make it worse this woman has a motive to continue her false accusations. She is pro-Clinton and anti-Trump. Add all of it up and it should be obvious this is just a fake story.

Her attorney also stated on a news interview that she now says there was a second girl at the party....

She can't keep her story straight....

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Kharron

Well...here is the thing... "the boy", Mark Judge, whom she claims broke the attempted rape has stated none of this happened.

Here is another interesting fact... Even in your story it is shown that the therapist wrote something which "is fake," that several boys were involved in the attempted rape.

Did you know that therapists can actually lead people into believing something happened that "didn't happened"? That seems to be the case here.

To make it worse this woman has a motive to continue her false accusations. She is pro-Clinton and anti-Trump. Add all of it up and it should be obvious this is just a fake story.

Her attorney also stated on a news interview that she now says there was a second girl at the party....

She can't keep her story straight....

Maybe Brett Kavanaugh took on two at once? Stud.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

You know how that hypno-regression therapy is ... multiple sessions can be hell when your personal fantasies and past lives start mixing in with your memories and the next thing you know, the aliens abducted you and did a dozen anal probes!

"Maybe Brett Kavanaugh took on two at once? Stud. "

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Vasa Croe

You know how that hypno-regression therapy is ... multiple sessions can be hell when your personal fantasies and past lives start mixing in with your memories and the next thing you know, the aliens abducted you and did a dozen anal probes!

...so now you and Vasa Croe are just being gross.
This thing is just off the rails ---- it's ridiculous that Feinstein sat on the report, I also think it's dumb assery that Jones is now saying she won't go before the committee without an FBI investigation.
Kavanaugh sounds like an entitled prep kid doofus.....

However, mocking anything to do with an attempted rape and mocking psychotherapy is reprehensible.