It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Video of UFO – Orb While Filming Moon With Nikon P900 – 18 Aug 2018

page: 2
17
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 16 2018 @ 11:31 PM
link   
No shadow on moon.

Much closer to Earth, much smaller than the moon.

My vote is a standard flight, if not a satellite.

Did you check flight radar? All active declared flights are visible, while in air.*

*Pretty sure you didn't, since you didn't see while filming.

Gonna need to do your homework. You want to add credibility that this is unusual? Go pull flight data for the day, time, and direction. If there isn't anything that could have been there, you'll have my continued interest.
edit on 16-9-2018 by Archivalist because: meh




posted on Sep, 16 2018 @ 11:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Archivalist
No shadow on moon.

Much closer to Earth, much smaller than the moon.

My vote is a standard flight, if not a satellite.

Did you check flight radar? All active declared flights are visible, while in air.*

*Pretty sure you didn't, since you didn't see while filming.

Gonna need to do your homework. You want to add credibility that this is unusual? Go pull flight data for the day, time, and direction. If there isn't anything that could have been there, you'll have my continued interest.


And this comment is why I love ATS.

If you can sell us - you’ve got the genuine article.



posted on Sep, 17 2018 @ 12:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Archivalist

Wouldn't a "normal plane" with that kind of magnification either be much much larger, and a out of focus blur ?



posted on Sep, 17 2018 @ 01:09 AM
link   
a reply to: EartOccupant

Not an optics expert, nor do we have a reference for object size or altitude beyond "somewhere between the ground and the moon, and smaller than the moon and bigger than a gnat"

I wouldn't know how a Cessna at 1000ft looks in a Nikon, versus an Airbus commercial air liner at 40,000 feet.

Not even mentioning drones, balloons, blimps, or military aircraft that break the 50,000 feet altitude mark.



posted on Sep, 17 2018 @ 04:37 AM
link   
a reply to: StarnatalSandia

Erratic flight path when zoomed in, a bird.



posted on Sep, 17 2018 @ 01:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: alldaylong
[Referring to the date of the OP]


Bloody Hell.

So it is .



Damn, you've spoiled it now, lol
:

You should have kept this up as a possible multi-dimensional time anomaly, in which we feed you useful information back to your present time in August, so that you can make a mint off the bookies and share it out between us all later.

Oh, well, back to the mundane present, then.


Thanks for the footage, but without any altitude measurements and other reference points, you're gonna get a glut of "It's a Bird!" replies.

One just flew by just above, I think.



edit on 17-9-2018 by ConfusedBrit because: (no reason given)




 
17
<< 1   >>

log in

join