posted on Sep, 17 2018 @ 01:22 PM
originally posted by: JeremyCorbell
Seriously... if you could jump in and interview these guys and satisfy all your questions, you should do it. I would support that.
Really? So I can't critique your movie because I'm not a filmmaker, is that it?
1) TOWERS - I was never supposed to give you what I did of the twin tower apparition. You are welcome.
So you weren't supposed to show that video but you put it in the trailer and in the film? In fact it's in the film about as long as it was in the
trailer. Somehow you broke your word to do this? I call BS.
2) COLM - Everything NIDS wants to be public, was made public through their website. Just because EVERYTHING is not in my film does not mean the
learning stops there. Happy hunting.
My point here is that it is one of the most important things said in the movie and it just dies there, waiting to be expounded upon. You seem to
completely eschew physical evidence in a way I find perplexing.
3) MUTE CLIP - Thanks for the compliment - however that's a strangely distinguished comment.
I'm not sure what you are implying by this. I found it interesting because it is actual physical evidence verified by the ranchers' statements. It's
the only new thing in the movie that is explored in-depth at all. That is why I found it interesting.
5) BONUS MATERIAL - I am always accurate with what I tell people about the extended interviews.
I'm not of a mind to go back and listen to see if you were accurate. I will state that I listened to two of your interviews and I did not take from
it that the extended footage was only available on the two named services. Obviously if I had I would've used one of those sites. Equally as
obvious, it may have been my lack of comprehension.
In the big picture I was highly disappointed that there was nothing new. It's a topic that many on this site are deeply interested in and already
have a knowledge base about. I know you'll point to the fact that the gov't was involved but really that information could be divulged in 30 second
video. All of the stylistic choices I had issues with are only personal taste and certainly would've been far outweighed if the subject matter
delivered anything new. If I waited to rent it for 6 bucks or waited till it was free to stream then perhaps I wouldn't have been so negative. My
expectations were high and perhaps I set the bar too high. Lastly, I feel like I blew the money but at the same time at least some of it is going in
the pocket of someone who is interested in investigating the subject matter in a way that I neither have the time, money, energy, nor inclination of
doing. Best of luck with this project and in your future endeavors.