It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NY Times correction after spreading BS story about Nikki Haley

page: 2
36
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 15 2018 @ 09:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Gothmog
NYT is done. Dun - done
They cut just about all their editors ( you know the ones that are responsible to review the story) and half of their writers
What are left are free to write just about anything they want with no supervision...


Is anyone shocked that the NYT largest shareholder is a Trump-hating, billionaire, Mexican Cartel Drug Lord?


Pretty stupid for the US allow ownership of their 'paper of record' by foreigners.
Someone/some people have allowed the US to be bought up by foreign interests over the last 20 years.




posted on Sep, 15 2018 @ 09:56 AM
link   
Should've been a complete retraction. Like when (I think) it was NY Times that reported Don Jr. knew about the Wikileaks release in advance, then it turned out he didn't? They just corrected the dates. The dates were the entire story. The story was false, should've been retracted. Same here.



posted on Sep, 15 2018 @ 10:06 AM
link   
a reply to: face23785

It should have turned into an article about Obama wasteful spending.
edit on 15-9-2018 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 15 2018 @ 06:25 PM
link   
The problem is the damage has been done. These morons believed the outrage porn(a few ats members included). This correction won't even register on their radars either...



posted on Sep, 15 2018 @ 06:38 PM
link   
NY Times? Wasn't that an American news paper back the 1920's? They still in business? Last I heard, they sold out to a bunch of bolsheviks and undesirables. Ain't heard much about them as of late. Still around. Hmmm?



posted on Sep, 15 2018 @ 06:42 PM
link   
Nikki Haley is a classy, American lady/woman. The girls and boys on the left would do well, just trying to emulate HER.
The N.Y. Times? Not so much.
edit on 15-9-2018 by murphy22 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 15 2018 @ 07:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: murphy22
NY Times? Wasn't that an American news paper back the 1920's? They still in business? Last I heard, they sold out to a bunch of bolsheviks and undesirables. Ain't heard much about them as of late. Still around. Hmmm?


Founded 1851.

Been "Bolshevik" since 1896.

πŸ’₯πŸŽƒπŸ’₯



posted on Sep, 16 2018 @ 08:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: NthOther
You have to ignore the NYT to make them go away.

You think that by exposing them you'll bring them down, but all you're really doing is distributing their articles for them.

And that makes their clients (advertisers) very happy.

Stop bitching about the NYT. Don't give them any exposure at all, not even negative (ever hear there's no such thing as bad publicity?).

Ignore them like they don't exist.
I disagree. Exposing them is the best thing we can do. That is the power of the Internet.



posted on Sep, 16 2018 @ 02:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: murphy22
Nikki Haley is a classy, American lady/woman. The girls and boys on the left would do well, just trying to emulate HER.
The N.Y. Times? Not so much.


She would make a great first female president.



posted on Sep, 17 2018 @ 02:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: xuenchen

Same New York Times that swooned over Hitler and Stalin.


You forgot to add Hillary to that list. Same category.



posted on Sep, 17 2018 @ 08:07 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Too bad this will never run on mainstream news. They ran their BS stories for a couple days and now all the leftist sheeple believe it as gospel truth.

Same old tactics.




top topics



 
36
<< 1   >>

log in

join