It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is Trump a Russian Intelligence Asset.

page: 4
15
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:26 AM
link   
We now resume our regularly scheduled anti-Hillary programming.




posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

So since Obama knew about Russian Meddling and called off his dogs wouldnt it make more sense that he is the Russian asset?

Obama was a huge "asset" for Iran too. Worth Billions of $$$ to them.



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123
Ridiculous thread, even as satire.

However, only the most ardent leftist will bite the bait and add their government provide two cents and say something that more or less agrees with the premise of the OP somewhere, which illustrates how widespread the delusions are spreading 😒


What? That doesn't make much sense.

Not only does "add their government provide two cents and say something that more or less agrees with the premise of the OP somewhere" not seem coherent whatsoever, your post employs a logical fallacy and a straw man.

You making things up out of thin air does not illustrate how widespread delusions are. It illustrates that you are willing to just make things up and cannot seem to properly formulate a response without being highly illogical.



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

The stretch was that bull snip article.

'What IF'.







What bit be specific what is wrong in it why is it BS

Like let’s have a discussion because you wanting to call everything BS and talk about Hillary isn’t really doing anything to challenge the ideas presented in the OP.



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:30 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Because it's nothing BUT supposition.

What IF.

No GD PROOF.



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: notsure1

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

So since Obama knew about Russian Meddling and called off his dogs wouldnt it make more sense that he is the Russian asset?


The extent of it wasn’t known and he did not want to appear to be trying to sway voters himself. I also think he didn’t think it would matter because Clinton would win then they could deal with it


LOL yeah right...


It is a statement of fact. What would you have said if the FBI raided Trump Tower in the weeks before the election?


You are right it is a fact that Obama was a Russian asset.



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

So since Obama knew about Russian Meddling and called off his dogs wouldnt it make more sense that he is the Russian asset?

Obama was a huge "asset" for Iran too. Worth Billions of $$$ to them.


Whataboutism....

Well this thread is about Trump.

It’s a discussion about the possibility that Trump could be a Russian asset



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Because it's nothing BUT supposition.

What IF.

No GD PROOF.



Yeah I feel like you haven’t read it....

Be specific



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin


Like let’s have a discussion because you wanting to call everything BS and talk about Hillary isn’t really doing anything to challenge the ideas presented in the OP.


Deflection is an attempt to end discussion of a topic that cannot be challenged on logical or factual grounds. Note how deflecting posts are receiving the most stars. It has nothing to do with how well the post was expressed, or whether it was valid.
edit on 14-9-2018 by DJW001 because: Edit to correct typo. --DJW001



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:34 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin




Whataboutism....


Perfect example of the op.

Russian Agent even after two years of Muellers bullsnip.

Trying to pin anything on Trump because his haters still can't admit they lost.



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin


Like let’s have a discussion because you wanting to call everything BS and talk about Hillary isn’t really doing anything to challenge the ideas presented in the OP.


Deflection is an attempt to end discussion of a topic that cannot be challenged of logical or factual grounds. Note how deflecting posts are receiving the most stars. It has nothing to do with how well the post was expressed, or whether it was valid.


Yup it’s has everything though to do with keeping that echo chamber sounding nice....



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:34 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96


Because it's nothing BUT supposition.


It is not a supposition, it is a theory backed by facts. Big difference.



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:34 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Again not actually challenging the OP...



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:34 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

No one has to read anything further than WHAT IF.

Not a statement of fact just a manufactured hit piece.
edit on 14-9-2018 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   
manafort enters into "cooperation agreement" with mueller. lol



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin




Whataboutism....


Perfect example of the op.

Russian Agent even after two years of Muellers bullsnip.

Trying to pin anything on Trump because his haters still can't admit they lost.


Get a clue. Anyone not part of your echo chamber can see clean through you. The more you deflect the more obviously you are worried. Why not try providing evidence that the theory cannot possibly be true?



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

No one has to read anything further than WHAT IF.

Not a statement of fact just a manufactured hit piece.


But...




posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

No one has to read anything further than WHAT IF.

Not a statement of fact just a manufactured hit piece.


So you have not bothered to read it.

Will take you 10 minutes at the most.

Not the best idea to start passing comment on something you know nothing about



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: ausername


who all omitted meetings with Russians on their security clearance forms again?



posted on Sep, 14 2018 @ 10:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

No one has to read anything further than WHAT IF.

Not a statement of fact just a manufactured hit piece.


But...



Добро пожаловать! Это не грязь.




top topics



 
15
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join