It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by soficrow
Bush could stop picking fights with everyone and getting all the psychos p'od with his bullying. ...Everything that comes out of his office escalates hostilities - and now he's threatening Canada. Canada!?
.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Originally posted by soficrow
Bush could stop picking fights with everyone and getting all the psychos p'od with his bullying. ...Everything that comes out of his office escalates hostilities - and now he's threatening Canada. Canada!?
How exactly is president Bush threatening Canada soficrow?....
Originally posted by parrhesia
I think your answer to this problem is far too simplistic.
Originally posted by soficrow
The point is though, Canadians do not WANT or need your missile "protection." More to the point, Canada's sovereignty is protected by international law, including her airspace.
Originally posted by FredT
Nice having the neighbor taking care of things and external threats.
Originally posted by soficrow
The US is saying that Canada has abdicated sovereignty by refusing to take part in the U.S. project - thus not respecting her sovereignty.
The US is also saying that they will shoot at hypothetical missiles in Canadian airspace without consultation or respect for the sovereignty of her airspace.
Any nation's airspace is sovereign. It's international law. To threaten to invade that airspace is threatening invasion of the nation.
Very cut and dried.
Originally posted by DeusEx
I find it curious that an educated man like you simply takes what is handed to him and believes it, especially from his own government.
I find it sad that you refuse to consider anything but the highest opinion of your country, which has been without a shadow of a doubt, the most destructive force on the planet for the last sixty years.
DE
[edit on 25-2-2005 by DeusEx]
Originally posted by DeusEx
Yeah, but see, it also means that you shouldn't run halfway across the world to kick over a regime that had nothing to do with terrorists.Hey, I was all for the war in Afghanistan. Canadian troops were there, and it was righteous.
.................
Originally posted by mwm1331
Just an example of canada taking advantage of America's Love for its allies. They know that despite this should a threat to Canada ever emerge we would protect them anyway, whter they helped or not. Why fund this, why help us to defend them when they know we will anyway?
Editorial: Martin misfires on U.S. missiles
Prime Minister Paul Martin knows Canada stood to gain more than it lost by joining the American missile defence program.
He ran for the Liberal leadership supporting the program, recognizing that U.S. President George Bush and the U.S. Congress put a high value on it in a 9/11-traumatized world where 40 nations, including North Korea, have missiles and more are getting nuclear weapons. He knew it might affect our sovereignty.
Canada was asked for little more than political support, at this early stage. The entire North Atlantic Treaty Organization had agreed that the research program makes sense. And Canada has always participated in continental defence.
Yet Martin failed to make this case, persuasively, to Canadians. He failed to sign on early, when it would have been politically less costly. He dithered until many factors combined to force his hand. And yesterday, his weakness forced him into a humiliating climb-down.
"Canada will not take part" after all, he announced, bowing to the inevitable. Polls show fully 54 per cent of Canadians, including many in the Liberal caucus, oppose missile defence. Barely 36 per cent are in favour.
Martin must now shake a growing perception, fed by Conservative Leader Stephen Harper and other critics, that he is a reed that bends in the wind. Being labelled "Mr. Dithers" in the Economist magazine is not the legacy to which he aspires. Ottawa's current foreign policy and defence reviews had better produce a focused vision of Canada's role in the world, one calculated to restore U.S. confidence and that of other allies.
Editori al
Originally posted by Muaddib
Who exactly is believing that only the wars fought by their countries are righteous?....
I keep seeing blanket statements such as this, and I presume they are made as blanket statements because it is hoped that they will impact the readers with blank minds. Yet, no one ever qualifies those threats, so I ask;
Originally posted by FredTIn as far as Canada feeling threatend by its poximity to the US, one of thereasons Canada can tread so lightly in foreign affairs is that very proximity. Nice having the neighbor taking care of things and external threats.
Originally posted by DeusEx
Afghanistan, and everyone was there, helping. Instead, you use the vague shadow of terror to start a crusade, to attack another country and to occupy it. You use terrorism -terrorism that Americans instigated in the first place- to justify attacks on civil liberties, war crimes, and attacks on other countries.
Originally posted by DeusEx
Instead of trying to help the Afghani people keep the peace, rebuild their country, you decided to attack Iraq with extremely tenuous evidence. Now, the country remains in shambles because rule of law doesn't exist outside Kabul's city limits. Then, you get your war crimes on, and your Camp Ect. on. You've managed to pervert your mission, turn on your allies, and make everyone a target by jamming the proverbial stick into the hornet's nest.
Originally posted by DeusEx
Man, we used to be tight. Now lookit what you've done. You're encroaching on our airspace, put Canada in danger, and basically chucked everything you believe in out the window. What happened to the America I knew growing up?
DE
Originally posted by Muaddib
What happened indeed to Canada and their 67 year old agreement signed by the then PM of Canada to jointly defend North America?.....
It seems that it is Canada who has changed, not the US.... The US still wants to defend North America, and want to extend that protection to Canada, but Canada retracted from wanting such protection, and in fact "threatened" the US that we must ask them permission, if we are to shoot at any missiles which fly over Canadian airspace with the intention to hit any cities in the US....
Originally posted by intrepid
Could it have something to do with the fact that an "isolationist" US, changed?
Oh, now you want to protect NA?
Canada hasn't changed one bit. It just became convenient for the US to need us. And what do they need us for? BACKYARD. "Like to have those ICBM's that the gov't I supported, landing in someone elses yard."
Originally posted by intrepid
Folks, when you get to the point that you can discourse on an international level, ie: WW's 1 and 2, send me the bill. You haven't even come close to paying your way to the table. And now you want us to arbitrarily take your #? What amazing arrogance.
Originally posted by flukemol
do what your good at.this is a easy bad leader wants to push canada around.thinks he can take something thats not his to have.this like when a drunk wants to drive home drunk and we wont give them the keys.this is easy no is no.no is not a bad word but breaking the international laws are thow.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by Muaddib
What happened indeed to Canada and their 67 year old agreement signed by the then PM of Canada to jointly defend North America?.....
It seems that it is Canada who has changed, not the US.... The US still wants to defend North America, and want to extend that protection to Canada,
Oh, now you want to protect NA?
Canada hasn't changed one bit. It just became convenient for the US to need us. And what do they need us for? BACKYARD....You haven't even come close to paying your way to the table. And now you want us to arbitrarily take your #? What amazing arrogance.