It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Facebook censors again

page: 4
75
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: DBCowboy

Its not censorship its them enforcing terms and conditions just like here on ATS. You post against t and c and you get banned.

Btw what is that supposed to mean that big shock comment?


You can try to walk it back, but you're for selective censorship.

Might as well own it.




posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:12 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

They can do what they want its their platform.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:12 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

They can do what they want its their platform.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:13 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Why do you hate "leftists" so much anyways? Sounds like somebody has issues.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Joecanada11

Say it three times if it makes you feel better.

You're for censorship.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:16 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

I'd take it with a big pinch of salt rather than taking it at face value. I've seen it scores of times on ATS when a member publicly states they were banned because of site bias when it wasn't the case. Or we see members saying they were banned for no reason and never had any communications. A falsehood.

Now this guy on FB is saying he was banned merely for mentioning AJ. Has anyone in this thread searched FB for recent references to AJ? Has anyone here tried making a post that mentions AJ? Is everyone else getting banned for mentioning AJ? Otherwise it's more likely (if he was banned) that there are other reasons.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:16 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

W hat makes this a very interesting exercise in thought I think is that I would 100% agree with you except for the fact that these companies are currently protected by the government from libel and defamation suits amongst other things. If they choose what to censor and what not to censor i think they argument can be made that they should be able to be held liable in these manors and be named in lawsuits.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Kandinsky

He was promoting the "Walk Away" movement and rally.


Occam's Razor?



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: DBCowboy

Why do you hate "leftists" so much anyways? Sounds like somebody has issues.


I'm for freedom and rights and defending the Constitution.

Leftists aren't.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:28 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Ockham's razor prefers evidence rather than a flat claim.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:28 PM
link   
Remember when you guys were cheering Trump on for purposely "triggering" liberals? Looks like you guys are being triggered almost every day by either Facebook or Google. They're really winding you guys up into a frenzy, I guess that means they're "winning" by your own standards.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: DBCowboy

Ockham's razor prefers evidence rather than a flat claim.


Occam's Razor prefers the most obvious and simplest solution.

N'est-ce pas?



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:51 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You went for the partisan, orchestrated conspiracy of suppression by the 'Liberal elite' solution. It's the last stop on the Simple Solution railroad.

The obvious solution is he was banned for breaking T&Cs and hasn't disclosed the reasons.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:55 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

And he linked to infowars. Against terms and conditions. Case closed.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:56 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You people and your ancient sacred document. Times change get with it or get left behind.



posted on Sep, 12 2018 @ 11:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Kandinsky

He was promoting the "Walk Away" movement and rally.


Occam's Razor?



So all people promoting the walk away movement have also been censored then?

Or no?


+2 more 
posted on Sep, 13 2018 @ 12:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: DBCowboy

You people and your ancient sacred document. Times change get with it or get left behind.



And that says it all.



posted on Sep, 13 2018 @ 12:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: DBCowboy

You went for the partisan, orchestrated conspiracy of suppression


I disagree.

Facebook did.



posted on Sep, 13 2018 @ 12:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: DBCowboy

You people and your ancient sacred document. Times change get with it or get left behind.


You have been tricked into believing that our Constitution is outdated and irrelevant. It is not. Also, it isn't that ancient, and it does not live and breath. It is a solid rudder that has navigation us over many a stormy sea and will continue to do so.

There are processes for amending it, and it is not done lightly. People that have no respect, historical understanding, and appreciation for the value of that document don't deserve to be in this country, imo.



posted on Sep, 13 2018 @ 12:17 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You're sticking to your guns, huh?


Hopefully this unwanted publicity and unwarranted oppression won't affect his GoFundMe campaign...







 
75
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join