It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

PolitiFact Blasts Kamala Harris Over ‘False’ Kavanaugh Video

page: 1
39
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+17 more 
posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 11:07 AM
link   
Now even the Democrat supporting Politifact (oxymoron) is saying U.S. Senator Kamala Harris (D, CA) tried to set-up Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh with an "edited" audio and video !!

😃😃

She and other democrati desperately attempted to trap Kavanaugh during the Senate hearings.

Dirty methods are exposed.

Vote Democrat for continued corruption and clinical jealousy on display.

Just think, id Democrats put half the effort into fighting poverty as they do with their jealous rages, the U.S. would be at zero poverty !!

Kamala Harris, the dumb.cluck of the decade 😎


PolitiFact Blasts Kamala Harris Over ‘False’ Kavanaugh Video

The far-left PolitiFact called out Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) Monday for taking Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh completely out of context in a tweet.

During his confirmation hearing last week, Kavanaugh referenced a religious group and then stated their position on birth control within the context of being forced to provide it through Obamacare.

In answer to a question from Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Kavanaugh said, “They said filling out the form would make them complicit in the provision of the abortion-inducing drugs that they were, as a religious matter, objecting to.”



"She's all smoke and no fire"



+12 more 
posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I lost any and all respect for the woman when in the hearings she was speaking to Kavanaugh and referred to our Constitution as "that little book he carries around."

Then she went on to say that she was more interested in his views on the laws that are not in our Constitution.

So she thinks, like a good Progressive, that the Supreme Court is the court of last resort, there is no way to change a SC ruling and making law there is just fine.

She needs voted out.

S&F as always...




posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 11:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: xuenchen

I lost any and all respect for the woman when in the hearings she was speaking to Kavanaugh and referred to our Constitution as "that little book he carries around."

Then she went on to say that she was more interested in his views on the laws that are not in our Constitution.

So she thinks, like a good Progressive, that the Supreme Court is the court of last resort, there is no way to change a SC ruling and making law there is just fine.

She needs voted out.

S&F as always...



If that was the last straw for you with her then you sir are far more patient and tolerant than I ever believed to be possible... I won’t say what I believe should happen to her and those like her that not only don’t take their oath of office seriously but wipe their arses with “that little book” but I’m sure if you imagine hard enough you’ll conjure up something close...



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 11:41 AM
link   
really good relevant article in National Review

www.nationalreview.com...


Progressives conceive of themselves as a caste apart, a special and specialized group of enlightened men and women whose job it is to organize other people’s lives for them, a necessity because those people are too dumb to do it for themselves. And special people must enjoy special exemptions: Bernie Sanders can rail against the rich from his lakeside dacha, and Beto O’Rourke can lambast school-choice programs even though he himself ditched the public schools for the tony Woodberry Forrest boarding school, where tuition currently runs about $56,000 a year — a third more than the median household income in his native El Paso.
And, of course, Senator Kamala Harris of California can get away with the grossest hypocrisy...
You know how this works: Liars think everybody is lying, cheaters think everybody else is a cheat, and self-serving political hacks who misuse their offices think that that’s just how the game is played, that everybody does it.


ends justify the means for the left.
shame so many elitists in the dem party



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 11:48 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Whoa, well, color me surprised.

I'd been thinking that Kamala Harris will be the next Dem candidate for POTUS.

I guess that's why she can do stuff like this. If she's the candidate for POTUS in 2020, anyone criticizing her for any reason, even if its true, will be deemed a racist white supremacist.

That's the beauty of identity politics..........everything is reduced to its simplest form.



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 11:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: ElGoobero
really good relevant article in National Review

www.nationalreview.com...


Progressives conceive of themselves as a caste apart, a special and specialized group of enlightened men and women whose job it is to organize other people’s lives for them, a necessity because those people are too dumb to do it for themselves. And special people must enjoy special exemptions: Bernie Sanders can rail against the rich from his lakeside dacha, and Beto O’Rourke can lambast school-choice programs even though he himself ditched the public schools for the tony Woodberry Forrest boarding school, where tuition currently runs about $56,000 a year — a third more than the median household income in his native El Paso.
And, of course, Senator Kamala Harris of California can get away with the grossest hypocrisy...
You know how this works: Liars think everybody is lying, cheaters think everybody else is a cheat, and self-serving political hacks who misuse their offices think that that’s just how the game is played, that everybody does it.


ends justify the means for the left.
shame so many elitists in the dem party


So by that logic psychopathic fascist mass murderers hell bent on world domination would think that everyone else is a psychopathic fascist mass murderer hell bent on world domination... hmmmmm makes a lot of sense where the Pantsuit Princess is coming from now... 🤔



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 11:58 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


If a Supreme Court Justice believes that contraception is the same as an abortion, and that justice was appointed to fulfil a presidential promise to overturn Roe V Wade, then the legality of contraception is also at risk. That's a valid concern.

But, more importantly, Kamala Harris has documentation from Trump's personal lawyer's law firm that cites Kavanaugh''s assertion of presidential powers to ignore subpoenas the wrongness of putting a sitting president through investigations. At the same time, Kavanaugh insists that, if seated he will not recuse himself if Trump's case comes before SCOTUS. That is also a valid concern.



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: ElGoobero



"ends justify the means for the left. shame so many elitists in the dem party"


There's genuine truth in that and it is very revealing because what it says about the US society is that while verbally touting egalitarianism, the Progressive/Leftist elites operate from the perspective of a caste system which they impose and of course, at which they occupy the highest value rank.

What's really scary is that they truly believe that their moral and intellectual superiority entitles them to determine what's best for the rest.



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:03 PM
link   
This is where the Democrats really hurt themselves with the majority of the USA. The 75% that aren't brainwashed "Democrat die hards who ignore all facts" see through this charade.. There's nothing wrong with this SC nominee. He's qualified in every way and a normal decent human being. By them stalling and attempting to make him a hitler racist woman hater just reinforces how looney toons and out of touch they are!



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: jjkenobi
This is where the Democrats really hurt themselves with the majority of the USA. The 75% that aren't brainwashed "Democrat die hards who ignore all facts" see through this charade.. There's nothing wrong with this SC nominee. He's qualified in every way and a normal decent human being. By them stalling and attempting to make him a hitler racist woman hater just reinforces how looney toons and out of touch they are!

It is not Democrats . They are moving to the Right .
Just more looniness from the Progressives and those that rely on the Progressive vote .




posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

So "whatabout" Kamala and her deliberate lies ?

What was her and zi democrati strategy ?

Why do Democrats automatically believe her and zi democrati BS ?

Busted in to💥The😃Sun😃Burn💥



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen


If a Supreme Court Justice believes that contraception is the same as an abortion, and that justice was appointed to fulfil a presidential promise to overturn Roe V Wade, then the legality of contraception is also at risk. That's a valid concern.

But, more importantly, Kamala Harris has documentation from Trump's personal lawyer's law firm that cites Kavanaugh''s assertion of presidential powers to ignore subpoenas the wrongness of putting a sitting president through investigations. At the same time, Kavanaugh insists that, if seated he will not recuse himself if Trump's case comes before SCOTUS. That is also a valid concern.







You dont understand the supreme court do you? They are referee's when you get conflicting case laws from federal judges the supreme court will make a decision between the two. There is no case where Trump would end up at the supreme court. You would need two conflicting rulings from judges involving impeachment and thats extremely unlikely.

This would be battled out in federal courts for at least a decade after appeals. In other words Trump would be out of office before any supreme court decision would be made.



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha




But, more importantly, Kamala Harris has documentation from Trump's personal lawyer's law firm that cites Kavanaugh''s assertion of presidential powers to ignore subpoenas the wrongness of putting a sitting president through investigations.

Source ?
Or just taking Kamala's word on it ?
Just like the video ?


Here's what's happened when past presidents have been subpoenaed:
— Jefferson declined to comply but ultimately produced some material in the treason trial of his former vice president, Aaron Burr.
— Nixon resigned and the issue went away.
— The Clinton subpoena was withdrawn when he agreed to testify voluntarily.
The Supreme Court has never directly addressed whether a president can refuse to cooperate in a criminal investigation potentially involving his own conduct. That's because no president has ever fought such a request.


When presidents have been subpoenaed

Want to make another statement as fact without knowing ?



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:28 PM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr



There is no case where Trump would end up at the supreme court.


A clash between Trump and Mueller over an interview could set the stage for a Supreme Court showdown

Rejecting the interview request could pave the way for Mueller to issue a subpoena — which, in turn, could end up in a lengthy legal battle that could reach the top court.
www.businessinsider.com...



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

But whatabout Kamala lying in front of the whole world ?

Who was she taking her ordaz from ?

Why would she be a scapegoat ?

Hmmm

💥😃💥



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


Refresh my memory. What was the "lie" again?



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen


Refresh my memory. What was the "lie" again?



😃LOL😃






posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:49 PM
link   



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


Seriously. What was the lie. I'm not seeing it.


“Filling out the form would make them complicit in the provision of the abortion-inducing drugs that they were, as a religious matter, objected to.”


That's exactly what Brett Kavanaugh said. The idea that contraception is abortion-inducing is not religious. The opposition to abortion is. The ACA never required anyone to provide abortions, just contraception. To conflate the two is what pro-lifers try to do, and what Brett Kavanaugh cavalierly did during the hearings, revealing his biased true feelings on the subject.
edit on 11-9-2018 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 11 2018 @ 01:28 PM
link   
Is anyone surprised that politicians use edited propaganda videos?







 
39
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join