It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Its Possible That the USA Hired England to Wiretap President-elect Donald Trump.

page: 3
39
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 09:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shooterbrody


So why then were ALL American citizens excluded from the indicted russians?


American citizens were also indicted. Flynn, Manafort, etc. The Russian indictments are separate.

No they were not liar.
Rod Rosenstein himself issued a statement EXCLUDING Americans from indictment.




posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 09:53 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001


American citizens were also indicted. Flynn, Manafort, etc. The Russian indictments are separate.


Shooterbrody's point was that no Americans were indicted for Russian election collusion. All we are seeing are indictments for lying, not registering as a foreign agent, and other frauds committed that don't have anything to do with the election.



edit on 9-9-2018 by Deetermined because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 10:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: DJW001


American citizens were also indicted. Flynn, Manafort, etc. The Russian indictments are separate.


Shooterbrody's point was that no Americans were indicted for Russian election collusion. All we are seeing are indictments for lying, not registering as a foreign agent, and other frauds committed that don't have anything to do with the election.




The investigation has not yet concluded. And Americans are being indicted. Some have been turned.
edit on 9-9-2018 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 11:13 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001


What have the Americans been "turned" to?



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 11:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: DJW001


American citizens were also indicted. Flynn, Manafort, etc. The Russian indictments are separate.


Shooterbrody's point was that no Americans were indicted for Russian election collusion. All we are seeing are indictments for lying, not registering as a foreign agent, and other frauds committed that don't have anything to do with the election.




The investigation has not yet concluded. And Americans are being indicted. Some have been turned.

Source an American indicted for collusion with the Russians.

I will wait.
Or is this more of your fantasy unicorn posting here?



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 11:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: DJW001


What have the Americans been "turned" to?

Vampires.
That one is a big Anne Rice fan......



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 11:41 AM
link   
By England I assume you mean the the intelligence services of the United Kingdom..... but lets put that aside for a moment.

This just seems to be one of those things that doesn't want to go away, I remember when Trump came out and openly claimed that Obama "Tapped his phones" and it was done with the assistance of British intelligence officials. Now other than his claim there has never, ever, been anything to corroborate it other than his supporters basically taking a line of well he said it so it must be true.

It has been denied on all fronts, there has never actually been any real evidence to prove what he has said and even Trump himself had to kind of back away from the claim because of the damage it was doing to UK/US relations.

Yet we still see threads on it pop up every now and then.



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 11:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Flavian



Ok, so President Trump can use the intelligence agencies of the US and her allies to spy on everything the DNC and campaigns for 2018 (and 20) are doing, then feed that information to the RNC and Republican candidates in order to provide campaign research and points of attack during an election. Right? All good, above board and fair. Wouldn't worry you at all?


No, that's kind of the point here. Trump could not use any US spy agencies to spy internally, whether on the DMC or elsewhere. It is against US law. Whereas outsourcing to an allied Spy Agency........



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 01:20 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody


Source an American indicted for collusion with the Russians.


No way anyone can chase those moving goal posts. Stop lying. I never said they were indicted for "collusion." They are being investigated for possible conspiracy, and evidence of other crimes keep popping up. We will know the extent of the conspiracy when Mueller completes his report. Congressional Republicans will try to keep it secret, but it will certainly get leaked by congressional Democrats.



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: DJW001


What have the Americans been "turned" to?


Stool pigeons.

edit on 9-9-2018 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)


(post by shooterbrody removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 01:32 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 01:35 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001




but it will certainly get leaked by congressional Democrats.


Spartacus style, no doubt.



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 02:47 PM
link   
From my understanding this is routine and has been going on for decades. Spying on your citizenry can cause problems. Therefore it's best to have an ally spy on them and share the information. That way you have some amount plausible deniability.



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001


I never said any were. They have been indicted because of the collusion investigation, which has not yet been made public.


Since you're claiming that you're not talking about the Russian collusion investigation, which collusion investigation are you talking about?



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 03:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: DJW001


I never said any were. They have been indicted because of the collusion investigation, which has not yet been made public.


Since you're claiming that you're not talking about the Russian collusion investigation, which collusion investigation are you talking about?


I am talking about the ongoing collusion investigation. It has already resulted in sentencing for related crimes, just not conspiracy yet.



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

LOL! Yet you can't name who or what is being investigated?



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 06:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: DJW001

LOL! Yet you can't name who or what is being investigated?


What part of "ongoing" are you having trouble with?



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Thanks for confirming that you have absolutely no idea what collusion, if any, they are investigating. Thanks.



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 07:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
...
Later in 2017, a leaked "Warrant Renewal Request" from U.K.'s Government Communications Head Quarters (GCHQ) was posted online. It was quickly removed, after England's leadership protested.
...
-CareWeMust


I actually posted a copy of that document which was leaked to a veterans blog.

Here it is again.

Trying to find the other half of the document.


edit on 9-9-2018 by ElectricUniverse because: add pic.



edit on 9-9-2018 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join