originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: PurpleFox
a reply to: Krazysh0t
WHAT IS THE REASON FOR REMOVAL? NOT LIKING THE PRESIDENT IS NOT A REASON.
YOU PPL ARE INSANE.
Well Mr. Caps Lock, speaking of insanity, I never actually voiced support for invoking the 25th Amendment now did I? HOWEVER, if you were to talk to
me like a human being instead of raging with your shift key mashed down I'd be more willing to explain to you why Trump's own cabinet members (again,
not me) discussed invoking the Amendment.
Trump's cabinet members? You mean the long seeking never reaching "spineless" GOP?
People were well aware of the "Never Trump" GOP long before his election. Anyone who believes the 25th should be invoked is a propagandist fool.
Just read the requirements for it to be invoked and the fine print. It's a nothing clause that requires alot more substance than the declaration of
even his closest Ally stating "oh he more nuttzy than a squirrel"
This whole thread isn't about how anyone might react or who would rebel over constitutionally protected procedure and you know that.
This is about the Russian collusion conspiracy of the left wing crackpots falling into the cracks and jumping on any idea that sounds good to the
ignorant masses who never bothered to read a book in their lives but think listening to such drivel makes them "smart" or "educated" when it sounds
acoustically good in their own delusional echo chamber!
By the medical diagnosis needed to invoke the 25th it stands to reason why no one has ever managed to knock a potus before on such a matter. If you
could prove such diagnosis it would stand to reason that anyone who could be effected by it would never have gotten close to being president to begin
It is such an obvious ruse and yet you defend it blindly as the toad in a well who never hath seen the sea.
You are simply using this discussion as a platform to attack the right wing over a few opinions of those who do not or will not accept such a move
without 100 per cent certain proof that it applies.
Yes it is constitutional.
Yes it is legal.
But that does not change the motive behind such an idea.... That motive being one hundred percent partisan and two hundred percent desperate in it's
The fact that it was even brought up shows nothing of reason by his cabinet but spineless brown nosing in order to cater to the left. The same
spinelessness they displayed in September 2016.
One minute you and your I'll are lauding the corruption in his cabinet members being indicted, laughing and high fiving like school children with a
The next you are defending them as the "sword of Truth" when in their fear of personal indictment or their skeletons being brought out next causes
them to backpedal as only a coward would do in order to avoid their rejection of a restaurant dinner!
It's pathetic. Desperate even.
And sadly hypocritical of not only yourself but everyone here who hates Trump
You have revealed your cherry picking nature in this thread, by writing off their cabinets claims as untrustworthy one moment and suddenly when they
make up any story that suits your invested political bias you all act like you support them and yet complain that we don't see the so called version
of Truth that is actually your confirmation bias screaming for attention!
You know what society used to call your type? Sycophants...
You sir, lack not only conviction, but you also lack integrity and the virtue to stand by your own claims to truth or Justice!
Your claims to have weight in this thread by claiming "well his own people" show a shallow foundation built of the softest sand easily washed away by
the tide of good reason.
And that is why you fail to change minds, because your arguments lack the solidarity needed to change the current.
But go on, make a reply that doesn't even matching in comparison intellectually but instead tried to strawman me. It's the reason I hardly ever reply
to anyone that comments. If you cannot form an innovative response then it is hardly worth my time.
So you will have the last word, but I doubt it will be worthy of response. A good parent does not engage the ignorant child.
As I will not bother with the intellectual under achiever....
But good luck