It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Irony: White House considers using Polygraph Tests to Identify the Op-Ed Writer

page: 3
13
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 07:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: norhoc
a reply to: angeldoll


I love that you have no argument or rational rebuttal and that all you can focus on is a mistype, you are so petty.


Aw man, it was just a little joke. Chill.







posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Southern Guardian

i dont have any tequila in the house. Just some wine I am using for chicken tomorrow.
Ill just take an ambi and pretend ok? I can take a swig of diet coke every time.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 07:37 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears

it has to be getting hard to take in.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 07:46 PM
link   
a reply to: norhoc

He has no honesty. He lies to himself for crying out loud.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 07:48 PM
link   
a reply to: norhoc

yeah Tiny reminded me that Strzok spoke about the regular testing at the FBI.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 07:50 PM
link   
a reply to: angeldoll

and actually you did address the point by noting the complete absence of any honesty visible with the naked eye and simply wondered about its potential location.
edit on 972018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 07:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Southern Guardian

What’s ironic about it? Oh yeah, nothing. Now that is irony.
edit on 7-9-2018 by NiNjABackflip because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears

In what fantasyland are we not allowed to compare one president to his predecessor?



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:01 PM
link   
I think the OP-ED was a real crappy thing to do.

It was cowardly. But that seems to be the Modus operendi of the leftists douchebags infesting our political system.


But even cowards have free speech.

And I will always defend free speech, even if it is petty cowardly douchebags expressing it.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I think the OP-ED was a real crappy thing to do.

It was cowardly. But that seems to be the Modus operendi of the leftists douchebags infesting our political system.


But even cowards have free speech.

And I will always defend free speech, even if it is petty cowardly douchebags expressing it.




I also think it's cowardly, although in a way, I'm glad it happened. (I can't help myself)

But you can come off the "leftist douchebags" infesting our political system.

It's clearly "the party formerly known as "Repubicans" that seem to be the "douchebags".



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:16 PM
link   
a reply to: angeldoll

Agree or disagree, I don't care.


Leftist douchebags infest both republicans and democrats.


I'll still defend the weanie cowardly right to free expression, however.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Leftist douchbags are on an even keel with delusional righties...



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: DBCowboy

Leftist douchbags are on an even keel with delusional righties...


Your opinion, "brah".

I'll even defend your right to express it.

A god damned shame leftists wouldn't reciprocate.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:25 PM
link   
I was only kidding when I made this suggestion...

www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:27 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Yes my opinion after observation of the partisan bickering on both sides.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: norhoc

He has no honesty. He lies to himself for crying out loud.


Sweetie, this is one of those times when you should at least CONSIDER ceasing to speak. Or type. Or whatever. I can't see you helping yourself here.

Do you have ANY kind of real basis for saying that? Other than the fact that you don't like the President?

Do you understand what the words mean? Read them again. You wrote them.

As I have done, many times, I would simply ask you to take us through the line of thinking that led you to posting nonsense. SHOW us that you really understand what you post, and aren't just slinging crap onto a wall and hoping something sticks. SHOW us how you arrived at this piece of masterful deductive reasoning.

PLEASE. I BEG you.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: angeldoll

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I think the OP-ED was a real crappy thing to do.

It was cowardly. But that seems to be the Modus operendi of the leftists douchebags infesting our political system.


But even cowards have free speech.

And I will always defend free speech, even if it is petty cowardly douchebags expressing it.




I also think it's cowardly, although in a way, I'm glad it happened. (I can't help myself)

But you can come off the "leftist douchebags" infesting our political system.

It's clearly "the party formerly known as "Repubicans" that seem to be the "douchebags".


If I was in an important position - - trying to hold it together - - while an incompetent "boss" was causing havoc.

I would want to remain in that position - - to continue damage control - - while trying to expose the true nature of the environment.

You have to have Power to make change. Exposing yourself would only remove you from that Power - - letting the damaging behavior continue unabated.

Secrets like this do not stay secret for long. But, maybe long enough for the author of Op-Ed - - to get some control over the situation.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: toysforadults


it's already standard practice in the intel community


And what do Trump supporters think of the intel community and honesty?



To whom are you referring? In the intel community, I mean...



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:49 PM
link   
2 inconvenient facts:

- "sources say" don't cut it no more
- those "sources" said it was his advisors, not him


Your thread is perpetuating a lie. And you habe the nerve to ridicule the president for lying.



posted on Sep, 7 2018 @ 08:58 PM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

So let's get this straight, the source is not legitimate, but others are not concerned about the source, rather concerned about defending the legitimacy of lie detector tests which is not the point of the OP at all. Oh and Obama.

Very original Fat Furry Texan. Throw anything and everything to see if it sticks. If one excuse doesn't stick, throw another one!





top topics



 
13
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join