It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The only reason NOT to answer the basic question of "Did you attempt to obstruct the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election?" is because the answer is "yes"
Giuliani admits Trump Obstructed investigative inquiries into the Russian probe
originally posted by: Irishhaf
It looks to me (for what that's worth) like Muller is going for perjury, so if they feel like that's where it is heading why submit anything or say anything that could be used to catch you in a trap. (Bill Clinton)
Better to stone wall in my opinion because ANYTHING that is given will be picked over in a huge way and almost guaranteed to be leaked to the media probably in time to (in there opinion) help the dems in the midterm.
originally posted by: Tempter
If Mueller had anything on Trump, he wouldn't need a confession.
End of story.
"That's a no-go. That is not going to happen," Giuliani said. "There will be no questions at all on obstruction."
There is no left or right... just stupid peasant Americans ;-)
We remind you of these facts simply because even assuming, arguendo, that the President did order the termination of an investigation (and the President, along with Mr. Comey in his testimony and in his actions, have made it clear that he did not) this could not constitute obstruction of justice.