It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tovenar
I'm a Fortean with respect to the fossil record and hypothetical earth histories.
Life is an agent of order, versus entropy, any way you slice it. If evolution is true, it is still a problem to describe how the life force increases order in the universe over time, rather than decreases it.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Raggedyman
No unlike you I recognize a despot is a despot because the individual is an asshole and don't attribute the beliefs he happens to share with millions of innocent people who've done nothing similar as the cause. Most Christians are good decent normal people, same as most atheists, evolutionists and theists. Neither belief in evolution nor theism by itself leads to any of this. It's an individual sickness pure and simple and to pretend otherwise is not only dishonest but a crime against all those who've done no wrong you are accusing by association. Collective hands my ass. Get over your tribalism.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: cooperton
Abiogenesis is a hypothesis. It's a sound one right now.
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: cooperton
Abiogenesis is a hypothesis. It's a sound one right now.
Good to see were back on topic. What do you have to say about the content in the OP that claims it is not a sound hypothesis based in any sort of observable science?
originally posted by: Raggedyman
There is no way anyone is going to discuss abiogenesis
Maybe only if they can try and confuse the argument of abiogenesis with evolution but it's clear you have differentiated the issues
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: tovenar
I'm a Fortean with respect to the fossil record and hypothetical earth histories.
Life is an agent of order, versus entropy, any way you slice it. If evolution is true, it is still a problem to describe how the life force increases order in the universe over time, rather than decreases it.
No it isn't. The Earth isn't a closed system. It receives most of its energy from the sun. If the energy received from the sun exceeds the energy lost due to entropy (which it does) then there is no issue.
Do the pieces of old cars lying in a junkyard get "coincidentally" blown into the shape of a '57 Chevy that runs? No? But life did; not from broken parts that were once alive, but from some ribose molecules floating in water...
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: Raggedyman
There is no way anyone is going to discuss abiogenesis
Maybe only if they can try and confuse the argument of abiogenesis with evolution but it's clear you have differentiated the issues
To try to separate abiogenesis from evolution is to ignore the beginning template for evolution. If the starting template for evolution could not have formed through ordinary material means, then the tower of evolution falls, and people are free to think for themselves again.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Bull#. God could have created the first life (which means the origin of life is Biogenesis instead of Abiogenesis) and life could have evolved from there. You are creating a false equivalency here.
originally posted by: Puppylove
If you observe a squirrel crossing the street you do not also need to know which nest the squirrel was born in to know it crossed the street.
Abiogenesis would be a theory on which nest the squirrel came from which could be wrong while evolution is the squirrel crossing the street which unlike the nest we have observed.