It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

One Word Has People Convinced Mike Pence Wrote Anonymous New York Times Op-Ed

page: 6
18
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I got it you're begging for this to be Watergate and helping Woodward sell books. Emotions aside NYTs needs to name the source.

Crazy how Woodwards book is released and suddenly we have an insider in the Whitehouse stealing documents to save us from the president elected by the people right before his books released and before the Midterms.

I need to know if the source is credible before I can see any validity to any of these claims. I'm for protecting whoevers the whistle-blower if they're credible and know of any crimes committed.




posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:09 AM
link   
There seems to be a consensus that it is Dan Coats who wrote the piece.
I guess we will see.
But it's a helluva great day in the neighborhood that they are finally going to wake up and do something before he does something really stupid like bomb something or assassinate someone.
I've been telling you guys. Now here are more and more associates saying you have to stop this man.
Whom ever it it it's time to come out of the shadows. This cheap reveal won't cut the mustard. Resign today and go to congress.
I wonder what Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell are doing on this warm and muggy September morning? Any guesses?
edit on 962018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: Krazysh0t

It's all fake news until proven otherwise. Do you mind proving me the "content in the article" is real and not just an biased opinion from an, allegedly, employee?

Yes. I am well aware of the cult reaction to anything negative about Trump.


I'm sure you're also aware of all the sensationalized headlines and tell all books with anonymous sources used to make money and feed on people's hate for Trump as well.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I got it you're begging for this to be Watergate and helping Woodward sell books. Emotions aside NYTs needs to name the source.

Um... No...


Crazy how Woodwards book is released and suddenly we have an insider in the Whitehouse stealing documents to save us from the president elected by the people right before his books released and before the Midterms.

Stealing documents? What are you talking about? Did you even read the op-ed? Are you talking about the claim in Woodward's book and not this op-ed about the person taking documents off of Trump's desk? Because that just tells me you truly didn't read this op-ed and are just winging it right now.


I need to know if the source is credible before I can see any validity to any of these claims. I'm for protecting whoevers the whistle-blower if they're credible and know of any crimes committed.

Like I was alluding earlier, no one needed to know Deep Throat's identity to see he was credible. Anonymous source doesn't automatically equal fake. It means you should take it with a grain of salt, yes, but dismissing it just because it is anonymous is perpetuating your own ignorance.
edit on 6-9-2018 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:13 AM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou

But CNN made it clear that the inside “resistance” aren’t “the left” they’re actually the right. Mental gymnastics by the msm is a wonder to watch.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Try to keep up

www.google.com...
edit on 6-9-2018 by avgguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:15 AM
link   
a reply to: JDmOKI

Tell all. Excellent description isn't it? Indeed tell all. And isn't it funny how they all have the same story to tell?
And now as confirmation we have a real white house insider telling the world it's all true and someone needs to stop him. Today.
edit on 962018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:15 AM
link   
a reply to: avgguy

Resisting Trump doesn't mean you are a liberal. It's actually not that hard of a logical connection to make really...



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: JDmOKI

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: Krazysh0t

It's all fake news until proven otherwise. Do you mind proving me the "content in the article" is real and not just an biased opinion from an, allegedly, employee?

Yes. I am well aware of the cult reaction to anything negative about Trump.


I'm sure you're also aware of all the sensationalized headlines and tell all books with anonymous sources used to make money and feed on people's hate for Trump as well.

Whataboutism.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I bet it’s not for you, but I mean you also still believe the dossier was kosher.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Try to keep up

www.google.com...

Try to keep up. This op-ed doesn't mention the document theft. This thread is about the author of that op-ed. Do you know the definition of off-topic? What about deflection?



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I bet it’s not for you, but I mean you also still believe the dossier was kosher.

Are all you able to do is argue in logical fallacies and falsehoods?



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:18 AM
link   
a reply to: JDmOKI

No New York Times does NOT need to name the source.
That's the law.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Whataboutism.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:19 AM
link   
I think it's funny to even consider Pence would write anonymous trash for the NYT... thread should be in the joke section. lol



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Man, I've read this article the moment they dropped it. Do you want me to believe that Trump is crazy because some anon said so? Because that's nonsense.

If you, or him, have anything to back his claim, let me know. Until there, stop pointing as FACT what is only speculation.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I'm ignorant because we've been tricked about anonymous sources in the past? The msm can write any smear article about anything and protect themselves by stating they don't know the source or wanna protect them. I refuse to be a sheep

I'm sorry I wanna remain skeptical because obviously people are begging to take down the president and the NYTs has been a joke for a long time.

If a crimes been committed present evidence



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills

I've read that online Twitter speculation, based on the way the op-ed was written, is McMaster. Maybe McMaster is trying to get everyone to believe it's John Kelly.


edit on 6-9-2018 by Deetermined because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Man, I've read this article the moment they dropped it. Do you want me to believe that Trump is crazy because some anon said so? Because that's nonsense.

If you, or him, have anything to back his claim, let me know. Until there, stop pointing as FACT what is only speculation.

There is literally plenty of evidence on a daily basis that Trump is unstable and that the claims made in this article are true. If you don't see it is because you are too busy yelling "FAKE NEWS!" merely because it is negative about Trump.



posted on Sep, 6 2018 @ 08:21 AM
link   
a reply to: avgguy

When CNN says something you can automatically believe the opposite.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join