Here are the major suspects who leaked the NYT anti Trump op-ed

a reply to: norhoc

Doesn't qualify as Treason.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: Willtell

Or just give them a polygraph.

This should've been done a long time ago. Just the idea of having to take a polygraph will give great pause to anyone contemplating a leak. Besides, the permanent unelected employees should be required to take an annual polygraph to retain their jobs anyway.

a reply to: Willtell

I can easily see Nikki Haley as a "back stabber".

If the 25th Amendment were brought into play, Pence would become President and a new Vice President could be appointed and approved by the Senate. As was done when Agnew was convicted.

I'll give you three guesses who might feel they stand in line for such a position.


Just thinking ...


How hard would it be for the President to "reassign" various people to other jobs with in the White House or even out side of it. Not his cabinet but staffers. This could tell him a lot about who may be behind the op-ed. If it was a member of his cabinet, they could be replaced real quick. I have seen where moving folks around often brings out hidden hostilities.

a reply to: Willtell

Some one at the NYT who read Woodward's book.

Some one who follows Mirriam Webster's "word of the day" which happened to be Lodestar on August 28

This is the biggest flustercluck in the history of the world,

globalnews.ca...

Bettors are playing the odds as to the identity of the anonymous official who wrote a New York Times op-ed, claiming to be part of an internal “resistance” to U.S. President Donald J. Trump.

The Washington Post speculated that the op-ed could have been a “last act of defiance” by deceased senator John McCain, who was also known to use the term “lodestar."

Pence was also at the top of the list posted by betting site MyBookie.

There's money to be made for the right guess....🤔

a reply to: snowspirit

My guess is Sessions.

My long shot guess is Rex Tillerson (he's not an option since he's out of the admin). But Rex has enough know how to speak on the matter, and he has nothing to lose.

originally posted by: Aallanon
CNN is fake news

Donald duck tRump is a fake president.

The closer to indictments of the DOJ and FBI operatives the more anonymous or even fake reports will be published. Much of the news media has roots in the Democrat Party or have served in the Clinton or Obama administrations. You can bet that the media will pull out all stops to protect their party.

The Kavanaugh hearings have been a good indicator of the lengths the left will go to defeat/resist the duly elected government. They have attempted a slow coup d'état to remove the president. Resisting everything is not "good faith governance." Now, we can add "disruption" to the normal operating procedure of the left. Attempted murder, physical assaults and office bombings are all included in the left's bag of dirty tricks which have been used to date.

a reply to: Willtell

February 10, 2020

REPORT:

The White House has identified and will soon part ways with the “anonymous” official behind a recently released book and a “resistance” focused editorial published in the New York Times, former U.S. attorney Joe diGenova claimed Monday morning.

More at: dailycaller.com...

I read someone else saying the same.
They know who it is and to expect another white-house departure this week.
good times.
Its someone on the NSC i think, probably a name we have heard much of.

a reply to: carewemust

a reply to: Agit8dChop
For the New York Times op-ed it was speculated that. General Mattis, perhaps did it. I'm surprised to learn that the person is still working at the White House. At a very high level too.