It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA Likely Approved the ILLEGAL Spygate Operations Against Candidate Trump.

page: 1
69
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+46 more 
posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:47 PM
link   
Tuesday, September 4, 2018

Last week Judicial Watch revealed that the FISA court never held hearings on the Obama FBI request to spy on the Trump campaign.

It is now becoming clear how those hearings were circumvented. President Obama signed off on an authorization for his Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, to conduct emergency spying. All the FISA court judge had to do, was rubber-stamp this urgent request.


It appears the reason there was no FISA Court hearing on the Carter Page FISA warrant was because Obama’s Attorney General Loretta Lynch forced through the application per an obscure loophole in the law.

President Obama would have had to approve the Carter Page warrant per law, in order for the spying to proceed without a court hearing. The rule is described on page 7 of 1978 FISA Act.

"SEC. 102. ø50 U.S.C. 1802¿ (a)(1) Notwithstanding any other
law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize
electronic surveillance without a court order under this title to acquire
foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year
if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath.""
More at: www.thegatewaypundit.com...

THIS is a more detailed Step-by-Step description of how the FISA Court could have been (for the most part) bypassed by Obama/Lynch.
HERE: twitter.com...


Also, when Donald Trump tweeted shortly after taking office that Obama had wire-tapped Trump Tower to Spy on his campaign, that was not a guess. Intelligence Officers are now stepping forward to state that they warned candidate Trump about the Obama Administration's efforts to spy on his campaign.

Details w/Intel Officers Interview: twitter.com...

This is a developing story that was first published over the Labor Day holiday weekend. Congress has now returned from Summer vacation, and will divulge additional information in coming days. STAY TUNED!

-CareWeMust


edit on 9/4/2018 by carewemust because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:50 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust


This should be very interesting to follow.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Here is the relvant part.


SEC. 102. ø50 U.S.C. 1802¿ (a)(1) Notwithstanding any other
law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize
electronic surveillance without a court order under this title to acquire
foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year
if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath “


But there was a court order I believe.

And that order was renewed every three months I believe up to 4 times.

The story was there was no hearing at the court, but rather the court made its decision based on the filed warrant alone.

So I dont believe this story. unless I am missing something.


+1 more 
posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:53 PM
link   
No wonder they're scrambling like rats jumping ship.

zer0Bama was behind the whole thing from Day1.

It was All the way with Hillary at all costs.

Apparently zer0Bama's firm stance on "Russians not doing anything" was the "decoy" red herring.

Busted and ash-canned 😎
edit on Sep-04-2018 by xuenchen because: 🔑📢



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: carewemust

This should be very interesting to follow.


James Comey said that AG Loretta Lynch did something bad, but he wouldn't elaborate. Doing so would also expose her boss, President Obama. The most recent I.G. report implicated Loretta Lynch too...though that section of it is still redacted/classified.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

There may be other "electronic surveillance without a court order" per the statute that we haven't found out about yet.

💥⚖💥



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler


Has this court order document been revealed?



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Grambler

There may be other "electronic surveillance without a court order" per the statute that we haven't found out about yet.

💥⚖💥


Yes that could be true.

But the articles claim that this fisa warrant we know about wasnt processed through the court is flat out wrong.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:01 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


Hillary-Obama-Lynch-Comey were the TOP dogs running this multi-faceted operation, that was handed off to Rosenstein after their departure. Their goal was to Stop Trump from winning. Rosenstein assumed the Impeach Trump leadership role.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Grambler


Has this court order document been revealed?


Well the fisa court application has been released, although redacted.

And we know the court accepted that application.

So this article is wrong.

The author is getting confused by the fact there was apparently no hearing (instead the court approved the warrant based on just the paperwork, which is very bad in its own right), and leaping to the conclusion that this means the fisa court wasnt involved and Lynch and Obama did this on their own.

That is not the case.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler


It's a good thing I put this thread in the Mud-Pit! The criminal deeds are multiple and MESSY. We need Jeff Sessions to bring clarity to all this. He's briefed by Horowitz and Huber constantly.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:04 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Haha, better bold the HUSSEIN part, huh? It's not in the title of the article, nor in the content, so that's all on you bud.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler


I've read a more detailed analysis. Will see if I can find it again.


+1 more 
posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust


BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA Likely Approved the ILLEGAL Spygate Operations Against Candidate Trump.


This was my conclusion about 5 seconds after first reading Trumps 'Obama had my wires tapped' tweet on the 4th March 2017, and nothing since then has convinced me that the allegation was not 100% accurate. In fact, given all the other FBI/DOJ BS that's been uncovered since then, his residence being wiretapped seems to be merely the tip of a much larger swampberg.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: carewemust

Haha, better bold the HUSSEIN part, huh? It's not in the title of the article, nor in the content, so that's all on you bud.

MUD PIT threads don't have to follow those rules you refer to. That's what makes this forum SPECIAL!



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:10 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

S&F



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: carewemust

Haha, better bold the HUSSEIN part, huh? It's not in the title of the article, nor in the content, so that's all on you bud.


Would Barry Soetoro work out better for ya?



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Grambler


I've read a more detailed analysis. Will see if I can find it again.

OK...Here it is in my favorite (easy to follow logic) format:

twitter.com...

Gonna add it to the OP now.
edit on 9/4/2018 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:17 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Many of us have speculated on this for almost 2 years.

Hopefully we can find some proof!



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 10:19 PM
link   
Our Founders would of hanged those treasonous bastards.

Cause, they weren’t worth a bullet.



new topics

top topics



 
69
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join