It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mad Dog General Mattis Torches Bob Woodward For 'Fiction' Anti-Trump Book

page: 6
68
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler




First I think your standard is incorrect; I doubt simon and shucter are as thorough as you imply


Is this your opinion or something you know?
You don't think a publisher has lawyers on staff to protect their interests?
Do you really doubt that given today's atmosphere of litigation?




posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: DJW001

Mattis has denied.
Unless Woodward releases tapes, that's the end of it, for all but those desperately hanging on to anything to support their narrative, believing a guy trying to sell a book as opposed to a well respected General.
Easy for Woodward to prove now if he says he has tapes...


Mattis denied because Trump would fire him and replace him with a yes man. The tapes will be played at the incompetence hearings. Removing Trump for incompetence will save the GOP from the scandal of further conspiracy charges.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:48 AM
link   
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist

Guess we'll know when Mattis gets fired huh?



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler




First I think your standard is incorrect; I doubt simon and shucter are as thorough as you imply


Is this your opinion or something you know?
You don't think a publisher has lawyers on staff to protect their interests?
Do you really doubt that given today's atmosphere of litigation?


Did the publisher of micheal wolffs book have lawyers when he was lying about who was sleeping with who in the trump White House in his book?



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler




First I think your standard is incorrect; I doubt simon and shucter are as thorough as you imply


Is this your opinion or something you know?
You don't think a publisher has lawyers on staff to protect their interests?
Do you really doubt that given today's atmosphere of litigation?


Did the publisher of micheal wolffs book have lawyers when he was lying about who was sleeping with who in the trump White House in his book?


Obviously you have not read the book. The White House has screamed that it is all lies... but no legal action has been taken. Why is that, do you suppose?



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: UKTruth

What reason would Woodward have to lie? He's 75 and semi-retired. His legacy and reputation is set as, arguably, the most famous and respected journalist in American history. And thanks to All the President's Men he probably has enough money.

So why would he risk losing all that by lying?


because if he doesn't lie, he'll lose it all



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:54 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

How many employees say I'd better stay here so my boss doesn't literally start world war three? Yeah that's what I thought.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:54 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

They didn’t take legal action against wolffs book either, and we know it was lieS

But I am glad that is the standard now

So everyone time someone writes something about Hillary or obama or anyone else, and they don’t get sued, then it must be true



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Agit8dChop

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: UKTruth

What reason would Woodward have to lie? He's 75 and semi-retired. His legacy and reputation is set as, arguably, the most famous and respected journalist in American history. And thanks to All the President's Men he probably has enough money.

So why would he risk losing all that by lying?


because if he doesn't lie, he'll lose it all


Please explain. Woodward could simply retire and live off his royalties. Why would he risk losing it all being sued for libel by the most litigious president of all time?



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler


They didn’t take legal action against wolffs book either, and we know it was lieS


Prove it. Woodward's book actually puts some of Wolf's anecdotes in context.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 06:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Irishhaf

It's more likely he feels he must remain to keep the mad man in check.


Only if you ignore the fact that he has a history of speaking the truth even when it had a negative impact on his career.


As the left so gleefully went on and on about we have the means to remove a president if he is mentally unfit, yet you and the usual suspects find it easier to believe all these people would rather "live in fear" under a man than get him replaced for a more secure future.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Well if you believe him anyway. Best president EVER!!! With a cherry on top.
🍒



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Irishhaf


Only if you ignore the fact that he has a history of speaking the truth even when it had a negative impact on his career.


This is not about protecting a career, it is about preventing a world war.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Hint:

Look who wrote it.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Grambler


They didn’t take legal action against wolffs book either, and we know it was lieS


Prove it. Woodward's book actually puts some of Wolf's anecdotes in context.


I can prove even liberals were disgusted with the unfounded smears that Haley slept her way to her position.

www.washingtonpost.com...

But apparently you have read woodwards book.

Please point me to the page where he puts the smears of haley into context.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:03 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Please .. a girl has to wear plastic wrap just to enter these political forums.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Irishhaf


Only if you ignore the fact that he has a history of speaking the truth even when it had a negative impact on his career.


This is not about protecting a career, it is about preventing a world war.


Preventing a world war?

Which side is clamoring for a confrontation with the worlds second lafrgest nuclear power again?

Oh thats right, the side you are cheering for.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:04 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

These are trump employees. Lol. OMG FOTFLMAO.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler




First I think your standard is incorrect; I doubt simon and shucter are as thorough as you imply


Is this your opinion or something you know?
You don't think a publisher has lawyers on staff to protect their interests?
Do you really doubt that given today's atmosphere of litigation?


Did the publisher of micheal wolffs book have lawyers when he was lying about who was sleeping with who in the trump White House in his book?


Obviously you have not read the book. The White House has screamed that it is all lies... but no legal action has been taken. Why is that, do you suppose?


Why wasting time with the Democrats anyway? You guys are already falling down the cliff, no need to a push.




posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Grambler


They didn’t take legal action against wolffs book either, and we know it was lieS


Prove it. Woodward's book actually puts some of Wolf's anecdotes in context.


Well, the real proof needs to come from Woodward. he's made some outrageous claims to sell his book.
Unless he proves his claims, he's just another propagandist.



new topics

top topics



 
68
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join