It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation hearings

page: 3
32
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:33 AM
link   
a reply to: SKEPTEK

What's the hurry? It's a lifetime position.




posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:35 AM
link   
Grassly just switched it up. We will continue the hearings today.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Deetermined

If you didnt catch it from the start a bunch of high pitched squeals from morons in the gallery had to be forcibly removed.

Democrats have disgraced themselves.

Two dozen reportedly arrested from the gallery. You would think they would understand that is not the venue for protest.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Don't be childish. What's wrong with being give time to review the documents.
What difference is 24 hours going to make in the big picture?



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Deetermined

If you didnt catch it from the start a bunch of high pitched squeals from morons in the gallery had to be forcibly removed.

Democrats have disgraced themselves.

Two dozen reportedly arrested from the gallery. You would think they would understand that is not the venue for protest.


Given their behavior I dont think they know what the law, or the constitution, is.


+4 more 
posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123

Don't be childish. What's wrong with being give time to review the documents.
What difference is 24 hours going to make in the big picture?


Why didnt they review the documents when they were provided months ago?



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:38 AM
link   
yeah no rush now....



"We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it."

TLB



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

They are still angry about losing the elections.
Potus check
House check
Senate check

No stopping the Kavanaugh express.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:40 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




Yet the Trump administration had imposed a flat ban on abortion for undocumented minors in federally funded shelters. (It maintained that minors who wished to terminate their pregnancies should either find a sponsor in the U.S.—a near impossible task for many without family here—or leave the country.) Kavanaugh held that this position did not constitute an undue burden, in a ruling which would have forced “Jane Doe,” a 17-year-old who was already 15 weeks pregnant, to continue her unwanted pregnancy.
There is little mystery to how all this ends.

The full D.C. Circuit swiftly overturned Kavanaugh’s ruling and granted Doe access to abortion. In response, Kavanaugh penned a furious dissent that brimmed over with anti-abortion rhetoric. The majority, he sneered, had granted Doe “abortion on demand”—a phrase that, as Irin Carmon notes, is deployed by the right to “denote women capriciously making decisions for themselves.” He claimed that Doe was not mature enough to make this “major life decision” on her own, even though she had already received the necessary judicial bypass from a state court. And he asserted, incredibly, that the Trump administration was being unlawfully forced to “facilitate” Doe’s abortion by merely stepping aside and letting her obtain it. (This argument is fundamentally theological, not legal.)

slate.com...


I kind of think that if he is appointed, even if he doesn't help over turn roe v. wade, he will allow laws along with the legal proceedings that would follow to just extend so far out that abortion is no longer an option.
which was the tactic that he bought into here.
I am pretty sure that there are a few republican female senators that might object to this.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Deetermined

If you didnt catch it from the start a bunch of high pitched squeals from morons in the gallery had to be forcibly removed.

Democrats have disgraced themselves.

Two dozen reportedly arrested from the gallery. You would think they would understand that is not the venue for protest.


Today’s American Democrats understand nothing about decorum, civility, or civil discourse. When they took civics courses out of high schools as a condition of graduation (spearheaded by the Dems if I’m not mistaken), it was pretty evident the path America was heading down. To quote an infamous fire and brimstone preacher...”The chickens have come home to roost” or something like that.

It does fascinate me that some folks here think this type of public behavior is okay.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:42 AM
link   
a reply to: dawnstar

No that's completely unreasonable. Don't you know?



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:43 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Why it's not true they just got thousands of Pages last night?



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:43 AM
link   
Is it to late to join the drinking game?
Somebody care to lay down the rules? lol.



Note: This is a S#!% storm, Grassley is pi$$end to no end.
edit on 9/4/2018 by efabian because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:43 AM
link   
The democrats are the only ones making any sense. This stinks of a cover-up, and they want to find out for sure before they proceed.

It's the intelligent and democratic thing to do.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

they just had tens of thousands of documents dumped on them over the weekend... I seem to remember it was on labor day, and someone mentioned it was last night. I ain't sure exactly when, or what the exact number was. some are saying they should just dump those docs onto the net and let the american people go over them let the dems know what is there.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:44 AM
link   
a reply to: angeldoll


Democrats also said they'd all vote "no" before even reading any documents.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123

Don't be childish. What's wrong with being give time to review the documents.
What difference is 24 hours going to make in the big picture?
Meh, probably.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:46 AM
link   
a reply to: dawnstar

I'm sure they will bring that up.

Might be cool to hear the "explanation".

💥😎💥



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: efabian
Is it to late to join the drinking game?
Somebody care to lay down the rules? lol.



Note: This is a S#!% storm, Grassley is pi$$end to no end.
I wouldn't say too late, rather, the rules of the game have resulted in almost everyone being drunk and passed out within minutes of the hearing 🤣



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 09:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Why? Don't be ridiculous.



new topics

top topics



 
32
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join