It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SasparillaMan
Could it be... that one of the dogs (sorry for you pit lovers out there) possibly “snapped” had a little too much play time with the little horses, the husky steps in to save the horses & gets taken out as well. One report said the pit-bull/boxer mix actually survived... just looking at available options (evidence on scene) before pulling in a mysterious third party attacker. If there’s already dog prints all around the property, they wouldn’t stand out as being from the guilty if your mind is made up to be searching for evidence that is from an external source.
Sometimes you just have to enter the head of who ever did this.
originally posted by: chiefsmom
I've been reading all the updates and information you all have been posting, and I just keep coming up with the same question.
Don't horses "scream" when injured? And seems like the dogs would have been barking their heads off. So how far away was the barn, the pond, and wherever the third horse was found, from a house?
They also said the scene had no signs of a struggle consistent with an attack by a large predator – with no hunks of fur away from the carcasses.
Tall weeds in the corral were not knocked down and the fencing remained undamaged. They also said the attack does not reflect the behavior of a large wild animal, which would not kill multiple animals and then just leave the carcasses behind.
Perhaps they are just playing dumbasses in order to investigate someone special.
There are two types of ignorance, natural, and acting. Either he doesn't know its a staged scene and really is confused, or, he knows more than he wants released. But he was given a cover story he could have run with, but he is repulsing it.
originally posted by: putnam6
a reply to: howtonhawky
The pictures I saw even blurred looked more like a slashing jagged cut, especially on the miniature horse at the pond. If was a knife it wasn't sharp. Interesting Id go with the local sheriff, the conspiracy theorist in me thinksFish and Game might have higher ups pressuring him, dont say there is an animal out there we dont know about. and there is the big looking feline paw print, and puncture wounds on the neck
Initially it looked like it was a large cat, but after inspecting the animals the wounds aren’t consistent with a predatory attack, per WLKY. There are bites, cuts, rips and tears, but supposedly it’s not consistent with a large cat attack.
originally posted by: BeefNoMeat
a reply to: All Seeing Eye
I sincerely appreciate you bird-dogging this story — weird one for sure.
What’s your fascination with black market adrenochrome? Do you have any reputable source/publication/study/etc that would substantiate your assertion(s)? I’d love to know and hear more....thanks in advance
Do you have any reputable source/publication/study/etc that would substantiate your assertion(s)?