It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Kharron
Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said in an interview aired on “Fox News Sunday” that the White House’s citation of privilege on the documents was the first time that had occurred.
Well, we're talking about the Bush Administration! 911, Blackwater, Halliburton, Enron, Iraq war, etc.
The Obama administration in its final year in office spent a record $36.2 million on legal costs defending its refusal to turn over federal records under the Freedom of Information Act, according to an Associated Press analysis of new U.S. data that also showed poor performance in other categories measuring transparency
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Kharron
Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said in an interview aired on “Fox News Sunday” that the White House’s citation of privilege on the documents was the first time that had occurred.
Well, we're talking about the Bush Administration! 911, Blackwater, Halliburton, Enron, Iraq war, etc.
Exactly. He may not have made some good choices, choices that the people would agree with.
If all that has to be hidden, perhaps this man is not the best choice for our country.
Or release it all, and let's see who this man really is. Not the facade, but what is behind it.
America has a right to know.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
My guess is that there is something in them that Trump wants to be made known so he is telling the dems they can't have it that way they go nutballs begging for it and when it turns out bad for them they have no one to blame but themselves.
originally posted by: DJMSN
a reply to: Kharron
I bet you have no issue with the DOJ withholding those notes on the tarmac meeting, nor the DOJ withholding the text communications between Bruce Ohr and company.
The Bush lawyers reviewed the documents and determined them privledged. The WH agreed and said don't turn them over. This admin has been more transparent and provided more access than any before.
One must not be serious about concerns over transparency when the last admin in its final year spent 34 million fighting FOIA request from journalist and the public. That was a record breaking amount and it wasn't the first record they set.
The Obama administration in its final year in office spent a record $36.2 million on legal costs defending its refusal to turn over federal records under the Freedom of Information Act, according to an Associated Press analysis of new U.S. data that also showed poor performance in other categories measuring transparency
www.google.com...
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: Kharron
They have already turned over what... a million or so?
Once again, you did not read the OP. In the first quote in the OP it says that 415,000 documents were released. 129,000 were not.
That is 31% of the released documents that are missing.
Or do you think hiding one third of someone's record is good practice?
originally posted by: Kharron
The Democrats are up in arms today because, in an unprecedented move, the White House has attempted to conceal some 130,000 documents on the Supreme Court pick, Brett Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh, nominated by President Donald Trump, worked in the White House under former President George W. Bush, whose lawyers combed through documents from that time and decided that 27,000 of them were protected under “constitutional privilege.”
The White House directed them not to hand them over to the Senate Judiciary Committee, one of Bush’s lawyers said in a letter to the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will host the hearings scheduled to start on Tuesday.
Another 102,000 pages of documents related to Kavanaugh’s record were not turned over for other reasons. The committee has had access to more than 415,000 pages on Kavanaugh’s background, the lawyer said in the letter.
Remind me, folks -- what do we stand for?
Transparency or obstruction?
Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said in an interview aired on “Fox News Sunday” that the White House’s citation of privilege on the documents was the first time that had occurred.
Reuters
originally posted by: Fools
originally posted by: Kharron
The Democrats are up in arms today because, in an unprecedented move, the White House has attempted to conceal some 130,000 documents on the Supreme Court pick, Brett Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh, nominated by President Donald Trump, worked in the White House under former President George W. Bush, whose lawyers combed through documents from that time and decided that 27,000 of them were protected under “constitutional privilege.”
The White House directed them not to hand them over to the Senate Judiciary Committee, one of Bush’s lawyers said in a letter to the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will host the hearings scheduled to start on Tuesday.
Another 102,000 pages of documents related to Kavanaugh’s record were not turned over for other reasons. The committee has had access to more than 415,000 pages on Kavanaugh’s background, the lawyer said in the letter.
Remind me, folks -- what do we stand for?
Transparency or obstruction?
Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said in an interview aired on “Fox News Sunday” that the White House’s citation of privilege on the documents was the first time that had occurred.
Reuters
Hilarious, we still don't know roughly 50% of Barack Hussein Obama's history.
Elections have consequences...remember?
originally posted by: Fools
originally posted by: Kharron
The Democrats are up in arms today because, in an unprecedented move, the White House has attempted to conceal some 130,000 documents on the Supreme Court pick, Brett Kavanaugh.
Kavanaugh, nominated by President Donald Trump, worked in the White House under former President George W. Bush, whose lawyers combed through documents from that time and decided that 27,000 of them were protected under “constitutional privilege.”
The White House directed them not to hand them over to the Senate Judiciary Committee, one of Bush’s lawyers said in a letter to the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will host the hearings scheduled to start on Tuesday.
Another 102,000 pages of documents related to Kavanaugh’s record were not turned over for other reasons. The committee has had access to more than 415,000 pages on Kavanaugh’s background, the lawyer said in the letter.
Remind me, folks -- what do we stand for?
Transparency or obstruction?
Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said in an interview aired on “Fox News Sunday” that the White House’s citation of privilege on the documents was the first time that had occurred.
Reuters
Hilarious, we still don't know roughly 50% of Barack Hussein Obama's history.
Elections have consequences...remember?