It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The UFO appears to be self illuminated. We could attribute that to the bright street light however that accentuates the wing problem. With brighter light would come better visibility of the wings. Then the other problem with the UFO being a bug is that the UFO appears to fade behind the clouds toward the end of its path on the left side of the screen. So unless the bug is at minum the size of a small plane then....well you get the picture. Its either CGI or a UFO.
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: Alien Abduct
The UFO appears to be self illuminated. We could attribute that to the bright street light however that accentuates the wing problem. With brighter light would come better visibility of the wings. Then the other problem with the UFO being a bug is that the UFO appears to fade behind the clouds toward the end of its path on the left side of the screen. So unless the bug is at minum the size of a small plane then....well you get the picture. Its either CGI or a UFO.
Yes we can attribute that to the street light, we can even see roughly where the street light is illuminating, its facing away towards the background.
The reason it appears to fade is simply because the bird flies past the point of where the street light will illuminate it and give it that fade out look.
Its a white bird illuminated by the a light.
Chances are the poster stormcell has hit the jackpot with their opinion.
"Looks like a seagull reflecting street lights and surrounded by cold icy foggy air."
So you are going with a wingless bird, got it.
originally posted by: shawmanfromny
a reply to: Illumimasontruth
Thanks so much for the kind words. So much fake sh!t out there. STILL looking for the 'Holy Grail' of UFO evidence. Just purchased a mint Nikon P900 high zoom camera. Not the best for low light situations, but I'm reading up on everything I can find on the topic. I hope to catch my own footage one day over Lake Ontario. Now that i'm retired, I need to find another hobby, besides working on the next issue on my Triumph Spitfire LOL.
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: Alien Abduct
So you are going with a wingless bird, got it.
wingless bird?
NO, birds that fly have wings, this is what My 3 year old niece is learning, birds without wings don't fly.
The bird in that video certainly looked like it was flying so I would say its a winged bird that was flying because without wings it wouldn't be able to fly.
simple logic.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: Alien Abduct
So you are going with a wingless bird, got it.
wingless bird?
NO, birds that fly have wings, this is what My 3 year old niece is learning, birds without wings don't fly.
The bird in that video certainly looked like it was flying so I would say its a winged bird that was flying because without wings it wouldn't be able to fly.
simple logic.
I didnt see any wings though, did you?
Did anyone here see wings flapping on the UFO in question?