It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

AP FACT CHECK: Trump’s week of fiction: trade, Google, polls

page: 3
13
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:12 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

That's Gohmerts opinion. He chooses to believe the daily caller. He's a Tea Party extremist conservative of course he's going to try to fix it for trump. The IG report mentions nothing of this alleged hack either. No one has. It's a fairy tale with no factual backbone at all.




posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:18 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

It's been five and a half years. She no longer has that email. This cow can't be any drier.
Spare me the meaningless evasions to logic.
edit on 922018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Sorry, nowhere in that source is it stated to be an opinion, and nowhere does gohmert list TDC as his source. Gohmert states it as a fact and describes what happened and says the FBI is omitting key details. It is not an opinion piece.

We have other facts such as China killing over 20 of our spies that they knew by name which can only come from someone at the top like Clinton because anyone lower and China would not have access to the real name just codenames.

Keep your head buried. You can't refute my source.



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Wait you're suggesting China would admit the hacking and release the emails if they did it? Hahahahahahaha.



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Kharron

Clinton's server wasn't hacked by a foreign power? Why are we still talking about Russian collusion?



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:28 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


We have other facts such as China killing over 20 of our spies that they knew by name which can only come from someone at the top like Clinton because anyone lower and China would not have access to the real name just codenames.


The problem, once again, is that Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State and would not have access to that information. All she would have would be code names and a credibility rating, and even then it would only be in the form of intelligence digests. Why do you keep pushing a self evident falsehood?



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Kharron

Clinton's server wasn't hacked by a foreign power? Why are we still talking about Russian collusion?


Because we already have proof. Now it is up to the courts to decide just how criminal it was.



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:35 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Saying it doesn't make it true. Are you claiming it's impossible for anyone with access to email her?

Are you saying Clinton followed all the rules to the letter so she would never have something she's not supposed to?

They had the real names of our CIA assets, that's way up the food chain. That doesn't make this the only possibility but it's the most plausible one.



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:37 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

That's not collusion. Clinton paid Russian government assets for fake dirt.



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: DJW001

That's not collusion. Clinton paid Russian government assets for fake dirt.


No they did not. The campaign hired a private investigator. They did not know nor care where the dirt came from. Trump Jr. sat down in a room filled with Russian assets, only a couple of whom were pretending to be anything but.



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:46 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


Saying it doesn't make it true. Are you claiming it's impossible for anyone with access to email her?


Of course they can... but why would they endanger assets if they don't need to? Remember, during Clinton's time at State, the biggest issues were North Africa and Syria. Relations with both China and Russia were pretty smooth.


Are you saying Clinton followed all the rules to the letter so she would never have something she's not supposed to?


It's not about Clinton, it's about the intelligence community. they tend to follow the rules when it comes to security.

ETA: And just saying something doesn't make it true, so why do you keep saying something that has no evidence supporting it?
edit on 2-9-2018 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:49 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

You can twist it any way you want Clinton paid Russia for fake dirt. Trump was interested in actual criminal activity provided by a Russian citizen that many Democrats also talked to.



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 07:52 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Sorry we have people not just Trump saying China hacked Clinton. Unless AP has a security clearance I fail to see how they are debunking anything and rather view this as a need to make Trump wrong rather than them giving facts since they are not privy to the facts.



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 08:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Kharron

and the Trumpets will respond with "see it's working" and "you can't believe the AP" and "Triggered, snowflake?"

I think we all understand that Trump has no concept of "truth." He's a good mouthpiece for himself, in fact the best self cheerleading President I can recall.


(post by M5xaz removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 10:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: DJW001

Sorry we have people not just Trump saying China hacked Clinton. Unless AP has a security clearance I fail to see how they are debunking anything and rather view this as a need to make Trump wrong rather than them giving facts since they are not privy to the facts.


Sorry we have people saying that the Moon landings were fake and the Earth is flat. That does not make it true. Trump is well known for his "alternative facts." Are there any officials with security clearance backing his claim? Because all the official intelligence spokespeople are saying it's not true.



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 11:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Kharron

I know you need to feed your TDS and your hate for him every single day, but here are the facts.

None of what you posted has proven to be a lie.

It may not happened yet, as the Wall or he may not have the proofs, as the Chinese hack, but you saying it's a lie, it's also a lie.

And BTW, how were these polls showing HRC had 90% chance of winning the elections worked for ya?

So... Got anything else?



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 11:03 AM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou


And BTW, how were these polls showing HRC had 90% chance of winning the elections worked for ya?


Why do you need to be reminded that she did win the popular vote, and Trump and his minions have failed to prove "voter fraud."



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

So you're saying all polls that predicted HRC win were only mentioning the popular vote and not the election itself?



posted on Sep, 2 2018 @ 12:58 PM
link   

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!


All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!




top topics



 
13
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join