It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Kharron
At least until novemeber????
What could trump be thinking with that comment??
He didnt make the comment....Reuters decided that's what he said and made the comment up.
Incorrect.
Reuters reported on what Bloomberg said.
Bloomberg< br />
President Donald Trump said Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s job is safe at least until the midterm elections in November.
“I just would love to have him do a great job,” Trump said Thursday in an Oval Office interview with Bloomberg News. Asked if he’d keep Sessions beyond November, he declined to comment.
I can't find the Bloomberg transcript of the interview yet. Can anyone?
Yeah...Reuters just copy pasted what Bloomberg reported.
Why didnt you use the actual source in the first place?
Like I said before....article title and thread title are completely false and misleading. Trump didnt say it at all....he actually said nothing.
Wait all you want....the spin from these idiots is amazing.
Because I was reading Reuters and they report accurately, as is shown here. Pretty much word for word, right, no spin?
Don't hit me, alright?
You think Sessions' job is safe or is not commenting on it concerning?
So far all I see is the same rhetoric and banter between them that has been there since the beginning. I have no reason to think he would be fired or quit at this point.
If he is fired or quits then I would guess there would be good reason.
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Honestly.....this whole thing is pretty stupid.
Do you know any employer in the world that would say your job is safe for however long in the future?
I mean.....what if you kill someone onsite the next day....do you still have a job for the next couple months?
It was a dumb question from an obviously over zealous reporter and apparently didnt deserve a comment based on how stupid the question was.
Are you going to win the lottery by the end of November? See how that works?
Now, this is what actually counts as spin. Are we talking about a grocery clerk job or are we talking about the No. 1 Law Enforcement position in the country? I don't understand your getting killed comparison, either. Who would have to be killed for Sessions to lose his job - that example does not work at all.
And after the President has on numerous occasion blasted Sessions for not reigning in the investigation against him, alluding his job may not be safe is a nothing burger?
No, I don't see how that works... what are you trying to say again? That safety in having a job under Trump is as unlikely as winning the lottery?
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Honestly.....this whole thing is pretty stupid.
Do you know any employer in the world that would say your job is safe for however long in the future?
I mean.....what if you kill someone onsite the next day....do you still have a job for the next couple months?
It was a dumb question from an obviously over zealous reporter and apparently didnt deserve a comment based on how stupid the question was.
Are you going to win the lottery by the end of November? See how that works?
Now, this is what actually counts as spin. Are we talking about a grocery clerk job or are we talking about the No. 1 Law Enforcement position in the country? I don't understand your getting killed comparison, either. Who would have to be killed for Sessions to lose his job - that example does not work at all.
And after the President has on numerous occasion blasted Sessions for not reigning in the investigation against him, alluding his job may not be safe is a nothing burger?
No, I don't see how that works... what are you trying to say again? That safety in having a job under Trump is as unlikely as winning the lottery?
Do you work for someone or a company? If you asked them if your job is safe for the next 2 months, would it not depend on how well you did your job? If you killed a fellow employee tomorrow, would that have an impact on what your employer may do?
Asking if someone will have a job in 2 months is a loaded question. It depends on if they do their job and dont screw up.
And Trump didnt "allude" to anything....the reporter did. From what the report says, Trump didnt answer.
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: Kharron
So you are saying that someone that has the job of leading a government agency does not have to follow the same laws that apply to other citizens, say a grocery clerk? Or that the grocery clerk has to have a higher standard to keep his job than Sessions? Because one job is more important than the other?
How Progressive of you.
As for Sessions, he recused himself under the wrong law and as far as I can tell he's been diddling around with some of his pet projects ever since.
Should have been fired when he recused himself.
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Kharron
At least until novemeber????
What could trump be thinking with that comment??
He didnt make the comment....Reuters decided that's what he said and made the comment up.
Incorrect.
Reuters reported on what Bloomberg said.
Bloomberg< br />
President Donald Trump said Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s job is safe at least until the midterm elections in November.
“I just would love to have him do a great job,” Trump said Thursday in an Oval Office interview with Bloomberg News. Asked if he’d keep Sessions beyond November, he declined to comment.
Link broke
Weird, works for me.
Copy and paste this:
www.bloomberg.com...
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Kharron
At least until novemeber????
What could trump be thinking with that comment??
He didnt make the comment....Reuters decided that's what he said and made the comment up.
Incorrect.
Reuters reported on what Bloomberg said.
Bloomberg< br />
President Donald Trump said Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s job is safe at least until the midterm elections in November.
“I just would love to have him do a great job,” Trump said Thursday in an Oval Office interview with Bloomberg News. Asked if he’d keep Sessions beyond November, he declined to comment.
Link broke
Weird, works for me.
Copy and paste this:
www.bloomberg.com...
Fail 😃
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Kharron
Are you saying that Trump has been touching Mueller???
So now we have a POTUS inappropriately touching someone in the FBI. Now I wonder who else he’s been touching.
originally posted by: 14377
What I find amusing is that people still think they can figure out what POTUS is up to. That hasn't worked out well for anyone.
The man has more angles than a protractor.
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Honestly.....this whole thing is pretty stupid.
Do you know any employer in the world that would say your job is safe for however long in the future?
I mean.....what if you kill someone onsite the next day....do you still have a job for the next couple months?
It was a dumb question from an obviously over zealous reporter and apparently didnt deserve a comment based on how stupid the question was.
Are you going to win the lottery by the end of November? See how that works?
Now, this is what actually counts as spin. Are we talking about a grocery clerk job or are we talking about the No. 1 Law Enforcement position in the country? I don't understand your getting killed comparison, either. Who would have to be killed for Sessions to lose his job - that example does not work at all.
And after the President has on numerous occasion blasted Sessions for not reigning in the investigation against him, alluding his job may not be safe is a nothing burger?
No, I don't see how that works... what are you trying to say again? That safety in having a job under Trump is as unlikely as winning the lottery?
Do you work for someone or a company? If you asked them if your job is safe for the next 2 months, would it not depend on how well you did your job? If you killed a fellow employee tomorrow, would that have an impact on what your employer may do?
Asking if someone will have a job in 2 months is a loaded question. It depends on if they do their job and dont screw up.
And Trump didnt "allude" to anything....the reporter did. From what the report says, Trump didnt answer.
Is it really that loaded of a question for Trump? What do you think he would say if he was asked if Pompeo would have a job in November, or Mattis?
Come on, let's get real and stop making excuses. We are not talking about a factory job, or an airport job -- we are talking about the top position in our country, let's treat it for what it is please. No spin.
He did not reply to a very important question and an intelligent person can deduce what is implied.
Do you think Sessions is doing a good job so far? At this point do you see any reason for him not to keep his job past November? Will you be surprised if he gets fired?
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Kharron
Are you saying that Trump has been touching Mueller???
So now we have a POTUS inappropriately touching someone in the FBI. Now I wonder who else he’s been touching.
I don't think Mueller is his type. Too old.
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: 14377
What I find amusing is that people still think they can figure out what POTUS is up to. That hasn't worked out well for anyone.
The man has more angles than a protractor.
It's actually pretty easy. Start with the realization that 99% of all he says is a lie. Then just believe the opposite of what he says and chances are pretty great that you'll be right.
He is exceedingly predictable.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Honestly.....this whole thing is pretty stupid.
Do you know any employer in the world that would say your job is safe for however long in the future?
I mean.....what if you kill someone onsite the next day....do you still have a job for the next couple months?
It was a dumb question from an obviously over zealous reporter and apparently didnt deserve a comment based on how stupid the question was.
Are you going to win the lottery by the end of November? See how that works?
Now, this is what actually counts as spin. Are we talking about a grocery clerk job or are we talking about the No. 1 Law Enforcement position in the country? I don't understand your getting killed comparison, either. Who would have to be killed for Sessions to lose his job - that example does not work at all.
And after the President has on numerous occasion blasted Sessions for not reigning in the investigation against him, alluding his job may not be safe is a nothing burger?
No, I don't see how that works... what are you trying to say again? That safety in having a job under Trump is as unlikely as winning the lottery?
Do you work for someone or a company? If you asked them if your job is safe for the next 2 months, would it not depend on how well you did your job? If you killed a fellow employee tomorrow, would that have an impact on what your employer may do?
Asking if someone will have a job in 2 months is a loaded question. It depends on if they do their job and dont screw up.
And Trump didnt "allude" to anything....the reporter did. From what the report says, Trump didnt answer.
Is it really that loaded of a question for Trump? What do you think he would say if he was asked if Pompeo would have a job in November, or Mattis?
Come on, let's get real and stop making excuses. We are not talking about a factory job, or an airport job -- we are talking about the top position in our country, let's treat it for what it is please. No spin.
He did not reply to a very important question and an intelligent person can deduce what is implied.
Do you think Sessions is doing a good job so far? At this point do you see any reason for him not to keep his job past November? Will you be surprised if he gets fired?
Yeah...it is a loaded question. I dont care what position anyone holds....if they screw up bad enough they can be fired.
If trump thought he was doing a really poor job then he would likely already be fired.
If he screws up between now and November then he could be fired....
Trump no answering was the right thing to do, if he actually did that. From the article I am highly sceptical of this being anything close to what actually went down though.
If you cant see the skew and bias then I dont expect you'll understand my answer.
Like I said....Trump didnt say anything. Your thread title and article title say he did.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Kharron
originally posted by: 14377
What I find amusing is that people still think they can figure out what POTUS is up to. That hasn't worked out well for anyone.
The man has more angles than a protractor.
It's actually pretty easy. Start with the realization that 99% of all he says is a lie. Then just believe the opposite of what he says and chances are pretty great that you'll be right.
He is exceedingly predictable.
In that case, you e answered your own question. Sessions must be doing a fantastic job! Or does he fall in your 1%.
Careful...your bias is showing.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
dude i really really want to see the supporters come in and defend his touching Mueller.
i bigly want that
#grabembythe3piece