It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: amazing
Are there any archaeologists on the site?
I'm asking because, if this was a picture of western Syria or something and you were on the search for ruins or artifacts of an ancient civilization or city, what would you be looking for? What markers or correlations would you be looking for that would show it as a possibility for further investigation?
Leaving out for a minute that it's on Mars as that brings in all kinds of confirmation bias and other things before even looking at the evidence. If this was the Sahara Desert, what would make you say, let's send in some people to look further or Nah this is probably nothing?
they may be at source but by the time we see them are we really seeing them?.
My contention is simply that it is so much easier today to obfuscate images and details in those images than it ever was before and those who really pull the string's of NASA have had a hell of a lot of practice.
You're talking about the Mars Climate Orbiter? You think they used it to nuke the "face?" No. It used solar panels for power. Sorry, you need a new belief.
Also I genuinely believe that the face on mars was deliberately destroyed by using a NASA orbiter which was supposed to take a closer look at it and which lost contact with control just before it's final entry turn,
I remember it from the News, there were protesters with placards